Cummings; classified emails found on personal accounts of Rice & Powell OOPS!

Whole lot of words there eM eM See to have to suck it in and agree with what I & the Office of the IG originally said:

----------> It's not a criminal investigation.

"IC IG made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security officials within the Executive Branch . The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession .

An important distinction is that the IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes . The IC IG is statutorily required to refer potential compromises of national security information to the appropriate IC security officials."

https://oig.state.gov/system/files/...ing_review_of_clintons_emai ls.pdf

 

Well, then there is that little bit about you not knowing what a Political Operative does for living. But then its like you said.....you thought you have some sort of smart powers.

And as usual.....always comes up as nothing more than a paperweight when trying to go personal.

Did you ever get that Room ready for what you can't handle?

 

filed by the Justice Department in federal court....snip~

They don't file letters in Federal Court......Paperlay. Not unless it is with their criminal case.


NEXT!!!!!!

 

So you're getting paid to post here?

dude - once you said you believed your posts here will cause Hillary and the State Dept. to be "depressed and worried & Trembling" you lose a lot of cred.

Even if you do fancy yourself the bestest "political operative" eva.

LOLOLOLOL

 

Cell phone email is a new thing? Sorry, but that's a fail. I had a corporate Blackberry in 1999 and most other companies had it as well. Obama didn't take office until 2009 and even the Blackberry system had become obsolete well before then because EVERY smart phone supported email.

 

And the very next word from your article is...

Although the FBI letter -- filed by the Justice Department in federal court in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit -- provides no details about the investigation's scope or content.

Nothing about it being a criminal case. Simply confirming an investigation. Which we all know what happening.

*ouch*

 

did you read my entire post?

"one only has to look at the VA computer systems to know how behind government is in adopting technology avail to the general public'

it may of been in the public, but the government is slow to adopt new technology

The President has a hard time even using a android cell phone, he is the first to use a blackberry

https://www.quora.com/What-kind-of-phone-does-President-Obama-currently-use

.

 

For those in the cheap seats...

To repeat: No emails were classified when sent - and it's only because of a FOIA request the IC community asked the emails in question be upgraded to classified before their release

The State Department objects to Intelligence Community's conclusions, ---> FBI is called in to act as referee between the two of them.

Anyone who says this is a criminal investigation is talking out of their ass.

 

Again, another epic fail. The VA and State Department are two completely worlds. But if you are to be believed, then the NSA isn't using cutting edge technology either...

 

No, I wish.... I'll bet your one of those that that hasn't figured out what entails with Political Operatives.

Lets see if you can answer a simple question. Are Politicians aides, and staff.....political operatives? Now lets put that dense grey matter to work. Who else are political operatives. Can you come up with the other two?

Should I wait or will you need to go study and google up some homework?

Btw did you set up our Ring yet? You know where you think you can come with the diss. I'm waiting or will you cop out of that too.

 

Again.....they don't file letters before the Court. Unless they have a criminal case going on.
What legal part about that don't you get.

No need to cry out in pain.....I promise I won't make it hurt to bad.

 

are you seriously trying to say the gov is as update on stuff like emails on cell phones as the general public? think it's you that just had an "epic fail" - lol

.

 

And this exonerates Hillary Clinton?

 

Then you should have no problem linking to a statement by the FBI it is a criminal case.

Have some fun digging. No two bit blog sites. A direct confirmation it is a criminal case from the FBI.

 

You can't be serious. You just used the VA as an example. Good job on the cherry picking though.

 

Sorry but the only letter I remember is from Blumenthal to Hillary. Perhaps you could repost the link showing the Email from Hillary to Blumenthal that contained the classified information. Hard yo go back over thrty pages so if you have a link please repost.

 

Sure thing CJ. Check it out.....and who sent it.


Did the latest release of Hillary Clinton server e-mails uncover a “smoking gun” proving a criminal violation of the law? Chuck Todd earlier said no, but The Federalist’s Sean Davis says yes indeedy. The smokiest of these “guns” is this e-mail, written by Hillary to Sidney Blumenthal in November 2009, redacted as classified almost in its entirety:



There are other classified e-mails in this tranche that originated with Hillary and went to other State Department officials. This e-mail is more notable because of its transmission outside of State’s personnel. Sid Blumenthal did not work in the Obama administration — Rahm Emanuel expressly forbid him to be hired anywhere in the federal government, especially State — and thus was out of the need-to-know loop, especially on top-level diplomatic talks. Where was Blumenthal working when this message (and others) went out? At the Clinton Foundation. Yet here Hillary is, sending him updates on negotiations with Germany’s Angela Merkel and Tony Blair, which are obviously too sensitive to send out over an unauthorized and unsecure mode of transmission. On top of that, she’s sharing it with someone not cleared for this information even when properly transmitted.

All of this fills in the requisites for 18 USC 793, with or without classification. Hillary appears to have originated obviously sensitive material and transmitted it through an unauthorized system to deliver it to someone who was not authorized to access it. That person eventually had his system hacked, which almost certainly exposed that information.....snip~

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/09/01/the-federalist-smoking-guns-in-latest-hillary-e-mail-release/

 

There he is with his RW nutecake blog stories.

When you get to this part

"but The Federalist’s Sean Davis says yes indeedy..."

You can stop reading.

C'mon, eMemSee -- you should have no problem linking to a statement by the FBI it is a criminal case.

Have some fun digging. No two bit blog sites. A direct confirmation it is a criminal case from the FBI.

 

Check with an attorney and get back to me.

 

Please post working link to your data. It doesn't agree with any source i have ever seen

 

No evidence that this lawyer knows what the FBI knows about Hillary's involvement. IMHO, the email that she sent about stripping the markings from the document and printing it is enough to disqualify her from future security clearances (and of course, for the Presidency).
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...rs-aide-to-strip-classified-marking-n21016804\

BTW, your link is from August 31, 2015. More information has come out that indicates that Hillary knowingly released classified data. Thanks for trying.

 

That's what I thought. You have no evidence of Hillary releasing classified data.

 

You see there - you can't.

You might bit powerful Po-lick-tacle OpErAtiVe!


#Winning!

 

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/fbi-formally-confirms-its-investigation-hillary-clintons-email-server

Law enforcement.

 

Amazing how it was classified six years after it was sent. Some imaginary smoking gun! Try again to find something sent that was classified at the time it was sent!