Well, you're one resident Zimmies who post in redundancy seeking clarification ... a way out in attempts to beat yourself out of a paper bag ... LOL.
Come back when you have a legitimate rebuttal to my post #25. Rhetorical non-sense will otherwise be ignored.
Was there any actual evidence that the kids broke into the car? Whose car was it? If the parents think that their son was wrongly killed why don't they pop the killer? I read about cars getting burglarized all the time. Usually nothing major is taken. It's hardly worth reporting 90% of the incidents. But in some States people do get major prison time for doing car burglaries. IMO it's always best to ask for what you want.
Good, let's start with you... "Well you can't get him for racial profiling in a largely homogenous neighborhood. It's why the prosecution in the trial didn't pursue it. Because 1) there's no evidence to suggest he did and 2) You can't racially profile blacks in a neighborhood that's.....entirely black."
Isn't the area where TM was murdered mostly white? Where did all of those white witnesses come from that gave Z an alibi?
From what I have read, once their friend was shot and police showed up, they admitted to burglarizing cars. From what I understand, HIS car was not burglarized this time, but previously... and those punks kept getting away. He was also never touched, nor was anyone armed.
Simply take racccciiiism out of it and Zimmy still profiled an innocent teen to create a danger on himself then sought out that danger and shot a kid to death ... as stand your ground and self-defense.
Your totally leaving out the fact that Martin was pounding him on the ground. He called for help and his last resort was to shot this person to save his life.
So what you're saying is ... is that Zimmy would have profiled an innocent white teen to create a danger on himself then sought out that danger and shot the kid to death ... as stand your ground and self-defense.
I will tell you now if I see someone walking around a neighbors house white or black and I confront that person if they start hitting me I will protect myself in any way. Rather a kid or a white or a black or an adult.
Martin had a phone why didn't he call the cop about the gay rapist that was following him instead of gay bashing hate crime he committed.
This is what's called wrapping yourself in cellophane, stuffing yourself in a paper-bag then placing yourself in a box for the purpose of beating yourself up to beat yourself out of it for Zimmy ... This is how you know you're a conservative.
Did they not say he might have been a gay rapist? The right didn't make that up. Did he not have a cell phone. Obama said see something say something. Why didn't martin listen to your savior and his and do what Obama said. Make a call to the police and tell them about the gay rapist he said was following him? He he was so scared why not go to one of the houses and knock on the door and tell the owner about this gay rapist? This is a real question. Why not call the police? Why is it ok for him to beat someone because he thought he was gay? Why is it ok to beat someone you think is following you? Tell me again why Martin decided to fight instead of calling the police. He decided to fight and beat this guy instead of calling 911. Poor choose
I can't believe there are actually grown men on this forum repeating this garbage. - - - Updated - - - Its amazing how many folks on this forum thinks that a 17yr old should have been more mature than a 28yr old man.
The jury found this to be true also. There was a witness too. Lets not let facts get in the way of your race baiting. So you are saying a 17 year old black man isn't mature enough to be able to call the police? Sorry if I think at 17 a person no matter what race is smart enough to know when and how to call 911.
The jury in the Emmitt Till case acquitted JW Milam and Roy Bryant so that isn't saying much. Tell me the witness who saw this from start to finish. I don't believe I said anything about calling 911, but feel free to refresh my memory.