Darwin, Another flatulent atheist god bites the dust!

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by Kokomojojo, May 16, 2020.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Darwin Debunked
    Science failed them again!
    Atheists worshiped yet another false god!

    Heads up believers!

    Darwin called The Origin of Species “one long argument” for his theory, but Jerry Coyne has given us one long bluff. Why Evolution Is True tries to defend Darwinian evolution by rearranging the fossil record; by misrepresenting the development of vertebrate embryos; by ignoring evidence for the functionality of allegedly vestigial organs and non-coding DNA, then propping up Darwinism with theological arguments about “bad design;” by attributing some biogeographical patterns to convergence due to the supposedly “well-known” processes of natural selection and speciation; and then exaggerating the evidence for selection and speciation to make it seem as though they could accomplish what Darwinism requires of them.

    The actual evidence shows that major features of the fossil record are an embarrassment to Darwinian evolution; that early development in vertebrate embryos is more consistent with separate origins than with common ancestry; that non-coding DNA is fully functional, contrary to neo-Darwinian predictions; and that natural selection can accomplish nothing more than artificial selection — which is to say, minor changes within existing species.

    Faced with such evidence, any other scientific theory would probably have been abandoned long ago. Judged by the normal criteria of empirical science, Darwinism is false. It persists in spite of the evidence, and the eagerness of Darwin and his followers to defend it with theological arguments about creation and design suggests that its persistence has nothing to do with science at all.50

    Nevertheless, biology students might find Coyne’s book useful. Given accurate information and the freedom to exercise critical thinking, students could learn from Why Evolution Is True how Darwinists manipulate the evidence and mix it with theology to recycle a false theory that should have been discarded long ago.

    Jonathan Wells
    SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND CULTURE
    Jonathan Wells has received two Ph.D.s, one in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California at Berkeley, and one in Religious Studies from Yale University. A Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, he has previously worked as a postdoctoral research biologist at the University of California at Berkeley and the supervisor of a medical laboratory in Fairfield, California. He also taught biology at California State University in Hayward and continues to lecture on the subject. https://www.discovery.org/a/10661/


    So many atheists rely heavily on Darwin to prove what they coin believer flatulence, but what about unbeliever flatulence?

    Seems the pot is always calling the kettle black, and worse for them, another false god of atheism goes up in flatulence x 2, both beer farts and belches.

    Why do we always see atheists and [neo]atheists denying evidence from the very sources they champion and worship?

    Darwinism is dead! RIH
     
    yabberefugee and usfan like this.
  2. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    26,417
    Likes Received:
    26,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You realize that one can discount the influence of a God and be skeptical of Darwin's theory all at the same time, right?

    It's not an either/or situation.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    and that applies how?
     
  4. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    26,417
    Likes Received:
    26,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You claimed that Atheists worship Darwin, but being an atheist does not rely on the belief in Darwin's theories. It's
    easy to dismiss Darwin and still come to a conclusion of no gods being involved in life on the planet.
     
    Injeun likes this.
  5. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    30,189
    Likes Received:
    13,773
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just another OP based entirely on nonsense. No surprise.
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never said being an atheist relies on Darwin, the intended meaning of what I said is that they trot out Darwin in their defense of atheism. Its important to understand the meaning and proper sense, please read it again for context.
     
    yabberefugee likes this.
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes totally! :rolleyes:

    I understand, the writer is totally incompetent, good point!

    Great contribution to the thread!
    :roflol:
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
    usfan likes this.
  8. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    26,417
    Likes Received:
    26,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So when you said that atheists "worshipped" Darwin, you were just relying on bombastic hyperbole to try and make a point.
     
  9. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    30,189
    Likes Received:
    13,773
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's being generous. The reality is he's just making **** up. Also not new.
     
    JET3534 likes this.
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not at all, how did you come to that conclusion?

    Darwin, Dawkins, Harris, atheists have several false gods they worship under the umbrella of science, intellect and reason, this debunking just happens to be about the the flatulence of their Darwin god.
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
    yabberefugee likes this.
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I suppose if someone cant read, or the material is to difficult for them to wrap their minds around, it could seem that way. I dont have a problem with it, whats yours?

    You should realize that dismissing science and intellect out of hand, the very basis used for the atheist position against theists is a completely total contradiction in terms, if not outright hypocrisy?
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
  12. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    26,417
    Likes Received:
    26,820
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What part of "theory" are you having problems understanding?
    A theory can't be a god - it's built right into the word. If someone was claiming, "The Law of Evolution", you might have an
    argument, but they aren't, so all you have is bombastic hyperbole when you claim "worship".
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure can, anything can be 'worshiped' as a god.

    Atheists claim theists worship 'sky pilots' and 'flying spaghetti monsters' and the 'invisible men in the sky' with the claim they are all false gods.

    So do we have yet another case where atheists apply the rules to themselves differently then they do to others?

    I am not the one that has a problem with this work, its looks quite well done to me.

    What part of 'worship' are you having difficulty understanding?

    Anything can be worshiped as a god, that is why we call it 'false' gods.
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    where do you guys dredge up these crazy rules? There is no need for something to be made into a law for it to be worshiped.

    You could worship your pet rock if you like.
     
  15. david gullikson

    david gullikson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2020
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Seriously, have you taken philosophy classes, that deal with the PROOFS OF GOD? Most right wingers would be afraid to, as they may become atheists too. And DARWIN, while a pioneer, is taught in high school, as limited in his truths. That laymen and know nothings still think Darwin equals evolution means nothing.

    God created everything, and did so in a rational manor. He did not wiggle his nose, like bewitched. His rules, are natures rules. He fights entropy, and we call that evolution. Darwin believed in God.

    The bible tells the tale of creation and progress, in the same chronological order as science. That bible thumpers have made you believe is SPECIAL creation, has made you reject all the learning that leads up to our present day, when right wingers ignore truth, and reality, and call themselves GOOD CHRISTIANS, due to this. Ignoring science, will NOT get yo into heaven.
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113

    But we are watching atheists ignore science, which is the core-basis for their religion.


    "Darwin was a confirmed atheist who had a deathbed conversion to Christianity."

    Like atheist antony flew, he is a cheat!
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
    yabberefugee likes this.
  17. david gullikson

    david gullikson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2020
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The ONLY thing wrong with atheism, is their surety. Not their science.

    Take some philosophy, and you will see, how FAITH is the ONLY proof of God. AS GOD DESIGNED it.
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe, however this thread was not created to support belief in any deity, I am agnostic, this thread was created to show Darwin, one of several of the atheist gods has been debunked, (unless of course they can prove otherwise), which this thread gives them the opportunity to do, Otherwise..... what you do with it or where you go with it from there is entirely up to you :mrgreen:
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
  19. david gullikson

    david gullikson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2020
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    All science pioneers are debunked, THAT is part of science. We have debunked newton. Michelangelo. Doesn't mean we don't respect their contributions.
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah admission that the basis for the atheist religion is mostly wrong most of the time? Interesting.
     
  21. david gullikson

    david gullikson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2020
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Atheism is wrong ALL THE TIME, as there is NO PROOF that God does NOT exist.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    17,945
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well from my experience the main thing they lack isnt belief, its the foundational atheology to support their positions. Its such a disaster attampting to debate them is like play duck in dodge, they simply have no academically legitimate explanations.

    Its like a group of people just woke up yesterday ate beans eggs and drank lots of beer and began flatulating the boards with beer farts and belches.

    It must be devastating to discover yet another atheist icon takes one up the , , snoot.
     
    Last edited: May 16, 2020
  23. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    6,806
    Likes Received:
    4,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I put their belief on the same footing as those that believe God exists despite there being no proof one does.

    If you encountered an entity claiming to be God, how would you know it was being truthful and not a great deceiver?
     
    david gullikson likes this.
  24. david gullikson

    david gullikson Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2020
    Messages:
    1,272
    Likes Received:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    There also is no proof God exists.
     
  25. Distraff

    Distraff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    10,380
    Likes Received:
    3,868
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Specifically how is the fossil record an embarrasment to Darwinism? You never backed up this claim.
     
    edthecynic and Cosmo like this.

Share This Page