Dems are counting on impeachment

What are yiu denying?
She went to the extra length of offering him a trial. Of course he had no defense. He submitted a false affidavit, that is prima facie evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice. And of course he plea bargained the charge with the Special Prosecutor.

 

The claim was Trump will be removed for obstruction of justice. Its the only thing the anti-Trump have to hope for.

 

WHAT!!!! Yes he did, for 5 years, in his plea bargain to the criminal charge with Robert Ray the Special Counsel. And what resignation.

 

He hasn't dropped any of any consequence yet.

 

So you a comfortable with such a narrow interpretation, got it.

 

It just reeks of desperation on the part of the BLOTUS supporters.

 

Got what what do you mean? The assertion here is he will be impeached for obstruction of justice since the Russian collusion thing has dried up.

 

No, the thread and article is about "impeachment", there are multiple grounds.

 

What grounds?

 

You were given multiple, take your pick as there will be multiple. ....Try harder.

 

Where? What grounds? The only thing you anti-Trumpers have his his conversation with Comey trying to spin it into some obstruction charge. But of course the Democrats said obstruction is not grounds for removal.

 

You are now looking for a straw......man. Carry on.

 

I'm looking for an answer from you.

 

You got one in post #417 and side stepped it.

 

The only ones saying that the "Russian collusion thing" has dried up are Trump-lickers. Meanwhile, Mueller's team continues their work and keeps a tight lip until it's time to lower the boom which drives you guys crazy.

 

Well show me what you got on Russian collusion.

 

I got a specious assertion.

 

Which you simply are woefully unable to address as it would be truthfully cathartic and that might be scary.

 

Show me the evidence else how does one respond to baseless specious assertions?

 

That's the job of Robert Mueller, he will address your straw.........man.

 

ROFL the only strawman is coming from you with your specious assertions you want to debate as fact but now show you have none.

 

You are grasping.............at straws AGAIN. It must be hard to constantly divert unsuccessfully out of necessity. Address post #417 instead of desperate weak dismissal as a diversion and you can get a meaningful debate but you simply can't.

 

Probably based on the notion that the lib/progs still have the black "communities" voting base.

Promising that base the prospect of jobs won't sway them to vote for the same dims that they have been voting for for the last 50+ years (and they're still poor).

Those people just want their handouts and have someone else do the work to pay for them.

 

Give me some facts to debate instead of your baseless assertions, your straws.

 

So another side step. Got it.