I'm so sorry to laugh but who the f*** represents you Democrats these days Speaking of the poorly educated, who are the geniuses who keep electing these idiots? Mad Maxine Waters With this from her own leftist media Is Maxine Waters Really As Dumb As She Seems? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/is-maxine-waters-really-as-dumb-as-she-seems-25-02-2010/ Jerry Nadler who didn't know Antifa even existed Labeled by his own media as King of Fools Eric Swalwell The most infamous idiotic constitution claim in history Do you know how many times the word "Woman" is mentioned in the Constitution? Zero. That is unacceptable. Women must be equally represented and equally protected. Adam Schiff “Trump could offer Alaska to the Russians in exchange for support in the next election. Or decide to move to Mar-a-Lago personally and let Jared Kushner run the country, delegating to him the decision whether to go to war.” Schiff stated that the results of elections cannot be trusted and Americans who vote are too stupid to make such decisions. Then you have the drunk Pelosi Here are some of her mind bending statements Waiting hours longer in the emergency room will allow you to make new friends! I believe in natural gas as a clean, cheap alternative to fossil fuels. It’s cheap, abundant and clean compared to fossil fuels. Unemployment benefits are creating jobs faster than any other program. We have to pass the bill for you to find out what’s in it. It’s almost a false argument to say that we have a spending problem. And right after democrats built over 800 miles of border wall Building a wall will violate the rights of millions of illegals. It’s not just our country, it’s theirs, too!
Oh boy. Only about 48% of Americans have a college degree. So the majority do not. This means it’s impossible for the less educated minority to dictate because they aren’t the minority they are the majority. So you are saying that Trump was the best interest of voters with least education and Hillary was not? More people with HS or less education identified as Democrats than Republicans in 2016. No that is not my source because I clearly stated 2016 as the year in question and your data was collected in 2015. Also your cite does not address the statistic I asked you about. I think you may be too dependent on bumper sticker source information. You clearly need educated so let’s begin that process. Here is the data I’m talking about. https://www.pewresearch.org/politic...ng-composition-of-the-political-parties/0_3a/
We know. You guys prefer one way committees who refuse cross examinations and think you have impeachable evidence. But we all saw how that turned out. Didn't we.
There are different levels of what is classified as uneducated, for the purpose of these polls they typically rank it as “some college” Are you discussing voters or identification as you seem to be using the words interchangeably. Personally I couldn’t care how one identifies as that doesn’t impact me or society, I care how they vote. Again, you are saying voters and then providing data on affiliation alone. If your metric is 1 point on a poll that has a MOE +- 3% and then ignore the data showing a 12 pt swing in the highly educated it might be exposing some internal agenda. When one moves to personal insults they have proven they do not have the integrity or intelligence to discuss something rationally. Cheers
That resulted in two successful acquittals because democrats were caught faking hearsay as evidence. Nothing new
Not my source which is Pew. Are you uncomfortable with Pew as a source? I clearly stated party identification. You introduced voting and I asked you about voting in the 2016 election. I have not used the terms interchangeably. You mentioned voting so I asked you a question you apparently can’t answer. No. You mentioned voting. I’ve consistently said party identification. I’m also uninterested in the highly educated. We are discussing the “poorly educated”, remember? LOL Saying someone needs education is not an insult. I did not say you were not intelligent. You have done that, ironically invalidating your own criticism. Previously you referred to less educated as gullible. And as dictating law to you. You also referred to the less educated as mindless voters and disparaged trades that allow STEM fields to exist. If you wish to learn I can educate. If you wish to stick with bumper sticker slogans and irrelevant data that is your choice. But I will call out your elitism in the future regardless of whether or not you wish to learn facts.
You said impeachments, both were successful, bipartisan and the second was held off because they had the votes to convict. Still impeached x2. That is all that history will remember. And this: What a legacy
If you prefer to use polls and ignore the MOE to come to the position you desire that is fine. I have yet to see any facts you have presented outside of the above however. Imagine using a single poll, showing a variance of 1pt and believing you are actually making a point. I see why trump loves y’all.
You are welcome to provide counter evidence you know. Go ahead and show the poorly educated voted Republican over Democratic in 2016. Go ahead. Let’s see YOUR facts! Also show that the category “some college” is considered “poorly educated”. I desire only truth. Imagine taking your position with NO evidence and criticizing evidence presented to you…LOL Trump would not like me at all. I have never voted for him in any primary or general election and never would. But I’m quite well educated and I abhor elitism. Absolutely abhor it. Thanks for demonstrating how shallow elitism is…
Hate to hurt your feelings but you can impeach a ham sandwich. It doesn't mean anything if you can't provide any evidence. It just makes you look stupid. Like having hearings to impeachment in 72 days with nothing but hearsay evidence. And you think you have some claim to fame over a fake impeachment? No wonder the left is failing at everything when it comes to voters now. What most remember is the batting average of leftist who have been making thousands of felony criminal claims for over 6 years with a big fat zero on indictments. 0/20,000 Thats is the legacy everyone remembers and why CNN and MSNBC have lost over 80% of their viewership. Why 55% of Democrats supported DeSantis grooming bill Why this idiotic wokeism is being shot down by the SCOTUS as well as the general public Why Twitter is being taken away from individuals just like yourself Why Disney stock is less than 65% of its original value Why Netflix told its woke staff to either man up or hit the road Why Virginia lost its democrat governance over individuals like you with you but but but Trumpism Why the November midterms are going to be a blood bath for Democrats And what has the promises of Dumbass Democrats produced in just 2 years? Why we have the highest gas prices in history Why we have the highest inflation in decades Why we have the highest illegal crossings in history Americans left for dead in Afghanistan Worst employment numbers in modern history Its so easy to shut down the left these days. I can't even imagine how difficult it is to run around with but but but Trumpy when everything around you is caving in. ANd if you had any clue what a real impeachment that was successful turned out, you would know that Judge Wright found Bill Clinton guilty of the perjury and obstruction and witness tampering in her civil finding and $90K. And he lost his case with Jones having to pay her $900,000. IC Ray wanted it on record and got it on record with the plea bargain. Clinton had no defense he had no choice but to accept the deal and lose his law license. And you claim the right is poorly educated? You guys don't even know what a real impeachment is. lol
I have no need to refute a single poll with a figure inside the MOE. Why should I bother? Especially on a assessed party affiliation that includes non-voters. I have already provided you one showing different data and all current polling shows this same trend. Exit polling from 2016 also shows the same https://www.statista.com/statistics...xit-polls-of-the-2016-elections-by-education/ I am sure someone of your esteemed self-confirmed intellect can even discern the numbers above. Your use of smilies only reinforce your ability of superior debate and understanding. I did misspeak when I said “some college” is considered uneducated as they typically draw the line prior and not after it.
Sure we do, I just showed you two examples of successful impeachments. These are fairly easy to look up Here is an article from your propaganda network https://www.foxnews.com/us/trump-im...first-president-ever-to-face-rebuke-twice.amp Trump impeached for second time after Capitol riot
And you thought anyone voting for Hillary Clinton was smart? Is this a representation of the highly educated left when they lose an election? Yeah, we saw.
If it was a successful impeachment, what was the success? Oh, because democrats voted to do it? Thats what you thought a successful impeachment is? Heres what a real successful impeachment looks like In the Clinton impeachment, Judge Wright found Bill Clinton guilty of the perjury and obstruction and witness tampering in her civil case fining him $90K. And he lost his case with Jones having to pay her $900,000. IC Ray wanted it on record and got it on record with the plea bargain. Clinton had no defense he had no choice but to accept the deal and lose his law license or be forced to face more felony indictments. So tell us, what was it about the judge stating acquitted went over you head in Trumps senate hearing? What was it about destroying every witness the left brought forward for hearsay evidence did you not get? What was it about Schiff refusing to put his whistle blower on the stand to testify that you couldn't understand? What was it about Pelosi holding the impeachment documents for 30 days trying to renegotiate the terms of the court (which she lost) when over your head? What was it about the faked Twitter post that were exposed to the Senate during the hearing that you forgot about? And this is what you call a successful impeachment while trying to claim Democrats are more educated. well ooookkkkkaaaayyyyyy then lol
Was Clinton acquitted? Because if he was and that was a “real successful impeachment” then by your own measure trumps two impeachments were “real successful impeachment”. Thank you for making the point so have been saying for pages.
And here you are trying to convince everyone of the higher education of the left. So I will walk you through it real slow in hopes you might be able to comprehend it. Clinton lost his law license through the impeachment process because of felony claims they were going to pursue to indict him for brought up in the impeachment the day he left office. He gave up his law license to trade for immunity. How many felony claims did Democrats make for indictment after Trump left ZERO Clinton had to pay out over 900,000 in fines How much money in fines did Trump have to pay ZERO Clinton had over 13 felony claim against him going into the impeachment process How many felony claims did Democrats have against Trump ZERO You really shouldn't be the spokesperson for higher educated Democrats. lol
Was Clinton acquitted in this “real successful impeachment”. Or are you saying fines are what makes it a “real successful impeachment”. Can you cite that via a legal source. How embarrassing. But I guess doubling down works for some. Perhaps you should educate yourself on what a constitutional impeachment is before we continue.
Wait, I thought the left was the higher educated. And you need a source for Clintons impeachment? Say it ain't so. lol For those of you who are the higher educated Democrats, Clintons impeachment record is public knowledge and can be found with a simple Google search of (Clintons Impeachment) For those who can't find it you can start here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton And I see you decided to just decided to forget about Clintons deal not to be indicted? How cute.
Clinton was impeached, successfully. I don’t know how you have twisted anything I have written to indicate otherwise. Yoh are the one that is saying Clinton’s was a “real successful impeachment” while trumps was not. What fact in the Clinton impeachment makes his real and successful that wasn’t present in trumps? Because common knowledge comprehends it is based on the final vote in the House, I am just interested to see when the constitution was edited to include fines or penalties. Feel free to provide them or we can keep up the embarrassment.
I wonder if DeSantis and the Republicans are going to refund all the student's money once they find out their credits won't transfer to Out of State colleges since they have lost his State's college's accreditation Critical Race Theory may become very critical
