Discussion pertaining to the militia act of 1792

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Xenamnes, Dec 5, 2018.

  1. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As things presently stand, exactly what is preventing the current legal owners of fully-automatic firearms from using such to engage in widespread mass killings that would easily dwarf the Las Vegas incident? Explain what this mechanism is, that is preventing such killings from becoming the new norm since such firearms not only exist, but are legally owned.
     
  2. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Indeed - the LV shooter had the means and the capacity to obtain a minigun and thousands upon thousands rounds for same.
     
  3. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is incorrect. The Second Amendment protects the right of militiamen to have modern infantry weapons.

    Not exactly infantry weapons.

    Think more along the lines of an M16 with an underbarrel 40mm grenade launcher attached. And an AT4 bazooka or two.
     
  4. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Not quite. In addition to that, there is also a requirement that the government has to have a compelling reason for the regulation.

    And the regulation has to be narrowly tailored to have little impact beyond that compelling government interest.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_scrutiny

    That would materially infringe on our right to have weapons that we can use for self defense.

    It would definitely infringe on the right of militiamen to have modern combat weapons.
     
  5. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The united state supreme court has stated, in absolute terms, not just once but three times now, that the second amendment is connected to the constitutional right of self defense. Therefore government does not possess the legal authority to dictate that firearms and ammunition cannot be deadly by their very nature.
     
  6. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have to wonder how long DT is going to hold on to his claim.
     
  7. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually, there is. That's the whole point of the Second Amendment.
     
  8. Richard The Last

    Richard The Last Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Agreed.
    Nothing in the 2A that says I can't have military grade firearms either.
     
  9. Richard The Last

    Richard The Last Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. Not according to Rucker. According to the Constitution.
     
  10. Richard The Last

    Richard The Last Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I believe that!
    Yes, that was the NRA allowing mentally unbalanced people to do things. No wait, that was doctors and law enforcement doing that!
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2019
  11. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you all for PROVING my point that NRA supporters incorrectly believe that they have some imaginary right to own lethal weapons of war.
     
    Mr_Truth and Richard The Last like this.
  12. Richard The Last

    Richard The Last Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Messages:
    3,980
    Likes Received:
    1,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just like your "imaginary right" to be able to post your opinion here in a public forum. Isn't life grand?
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  13. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Second Amendment is far from imaginary.
     
  14. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong!

    I have no right at all to post my opinion on this "public": forum since it is PRIVATELY OWNED and PF can decide to stop me from posting anything at all.

    PF sets the REGULATIONS as to what I can and cannot post on THEIR PRIVATE forum.

    Unless I ABIDE by the REGULATIONS that PF has laid out I will lose my ability to post on this forum.

    That is REALITY!

    We the People have formed a government to protect our INDIVIDUAL rights to express our opinions. However that right is REGULATED in much the same way that PF regulates their forum. I have no individual right to express any opinion that INCITES violence. There is no individual right to utter falsehoods for the purpose of deceiving others for my own personal gain. I have no right to plagiarize the words of others and call them my own.

    ALL of the above are REASONABLE REGULATIONS upon my individual right to freedom of expression. None of those regulations INFRINGE upon my right to express my opinion.

    NRA supporters ERRONEOUSLY believe that the government of We the People does not have the right to REGULATE their ownership of lethal weapons. They are 100% WRONG in that absurd belief.

    That is REALITY!
     
    Mr_Truth and David Landbrecht like this.
  15. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That isn't reality. Few NRA supporters oppose regulations that pass muster with strict scrutiny.
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2019
    Richard The Last likes this.
  16. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reality proves the opposite to be the case!

    Just look at all of the posts in this thread and others in this subforum where there is vehement opposition to every attempt to regulate the ownership of lethal firearms.
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  17. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Opposition arises only when the regulations in question do not pass muster with strict scrutiny.
     
  18. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nonsense!
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  19. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Show some examples of opposition to laws that pass muster with strict scrutiny.
     
  20. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Regulations that keep lethal firearms out of the hands of the mentally unbalanced!
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  21. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's pretty vague. What regulations are you talking about?
     
  22. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ones that were already in place that your beloved BLOTUS rolled back arbitrarily in order to placate the NRA supporters.
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  23. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    People who are claustrophobic or anorexic are hardly dangerous, and there is no justification for depriving them of guns.

    Those regulations would not have even come close to passing muster with strict scrutiny.
     
    6Gunner and Rucker61 like this.
  24. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kneejerk denialism without any substantive basis proves my point once again!
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  25. Toggle Almendro

    Toggle Almendro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,929
    Likes Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nonsense. People with anorexia and claustrophobia are hardly dangerous.

    Trump just prevented the left from violating people's civil liberties for fun. That's a good thing.
     

Share This Page