Disney to pull funding from Boy Scouts if they don't allow Homosexual leaders

Jerry was totally gay. How many dudes do you have to sleep with before you are considered gay?

No gay man has ever had a wife? Please..

 

Nothing is stopping that from happening. You could exclude blacks too. And Jews.

Of course it will always attract pedophiles. Pedophiles are attracted to children's groups like bees to honey.

 

Now that's "freedom"!

 

Your more interested in forcing organizations you don't like to be more like the clubs you want but can't be bothered with creating. If you want gays and young boys together in the forest, start your own club. No need to sue another because they think it is a bad idea.

 

Nobody is suing anyone. Disney is choosing not to fund bigotry and hate.

 

Yes, Pedos are attracted to children's groups. Good reason to not have any gay scout leaders who may also be pedo.

Sexual attraction to the gender of the children in under your care is not the same as race or skin color. Being gay is not like being Jewish or black. Should men be in the women's locker room at school? Why not? Are you saying black people can't be gym teachers? Same logic.

 

We are passed the Disney decision. We all agree they have their right to stop funding the scouts for any reason. We have moved on to why the gay left wants to force their way in. The "I want to play with little boys, and I don't care who I have to sue to get at them", mentality is what we are disputing for the last 10 pages or more.

 

If two men get married do you assume that they are straight- or gay?

Jerry Sandusky was an openly heterosexual man. And a homosexual pedophile.

Want even better ones than that?

http://beforeitsnews.com/religion/2...-and-recorded-the-abuse-on-video-2460808.html

Alabama father rapes his 9-year-old son and recorded the abuse on video

Those who want to slander homosexuals claim that any homosexual act- even against a child means that man is a homosexual.

But of course- they hold heterosexuals to a different standard.

It is the homosexual equivalent to "a single drop of black blood makes the person black"

Heterosexual men- including fathers- rape little boys because those men are pedophiles- homosexual pedophiles.
Homosexual men- also rape little boys because those men are pedophiles- homosexual pedophiles.

But mostly men rape little girls. Because the majority of child rape victims are girls.

And the homophobes don't care about them at all.

 

I would kill the one that ever touched mine like that.

 

Jerry Sandusky never slept with an adult male. He is a pedophile. That is a person who is attracted to children- they can be attracted to either male or female children or both. How many times does this have to be explained to you before you understand?

 

No that is what you have been discussing.

We have been discussing how those who are against homosexuals try to use the pretext of child molestation to slander all homosexuals.

 

Yes, apparently girls don't matter.

- - - Updated - - -

Exactly, and as a gay person myself, I'm getting damn sick of it.

 

I look forward to seeing you use the term in any context other then when referring to homosexuals.

For me its like someone who only uses the term 'boy' when addressing an adult, if the adult is a black man.

- - - Updated - - -

As a father I am rather tired of anyone using the pretext of protecting the children while completely ignoring the majority of child abuse victims.

 

No, if you build bridges your whole life and blow one dude are you a bridge builder or a ....? lol..

C'mon man. Jerry was gay. He raped multiple male children. If he just your average pedo and does care about sex then why all the penis fondling? He isn't even bi. He adopted a male kid to rape at home so he didn't have to travel. Totally gay. If we are going to believe in upside down world then we will never agree on anything. Black is white and white is black to the left, and no that is not a racist statement.

- - - Updated - - -

We all think men shouldn't be in the girl's locker room, why don't you apply that same logic to boys?

 

Should you also exclude Blacks who may be pedo's? Jews who may be pedo's?

What you seem to want to avoid entirely is my point.

ALL children- including girls- are in more danger from any man- than from any woman.

IF your pretext for discrimination against homosexuals in the boy scout is 'protecting the boys' from child molesters- then you should not allow any men to lead boy scout troops.

Not only will you not know if they are homosexuals(thousands of homosexual men have led BS troops) but you will not know who are the pedophiles and who are not- the only safe thing to do would be to exclude men.

Discriminating against being gay is exactly like discriminating against someone for being Jewish.

- - - Updated - - -

Okay- lets exclude men from boys locker rooms too.

That would be the same logic.

 

You bring it upon yourself. You have the choice to quit your lifestyle just like any other practitioner of deviant behavior, like alcoholics and drug addicts. I'm sure that there are self-help programs out there that can help you with your problem.

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/religion/20...o-2460808.html

Alabama father rapes his 9-year-old son and recorded the abuse on video

Those who want to slander homosexuals claim that any homosexual act- even against a child means that man is a homosexual.

But of course- they hold heterosexuals to a different standard.

It is the homosexual equivalent to "a single drop of black blood makes the person black"

Heterosexual men- including fathers- rape little boys because those men are pedophiles- homosexual pedophiles.
Homosexual men- also rape little boys because those men are pedophiles- homosexual pedophiles.

But mostly men rape little girls. Because the majority of child rape victims are girls.

And the homophobes don't care about them at all.

 

Just like any Jew can quite that deviant behavior.

Jews represent about 2% of the population in the United States. Homosexuals represent-lets call it 3-5%.

Jews according to your logic, 'bring it upon yourself'

 

Nonsense, Republican states have the harshest child molestation laws. It is only CO and HI that let child molesters off with a slap on the wrist.

Most men are hetero, that is why most child rape is aimed at little girls.

Gay men rape little boys though, don't they? Instead of little girls?

That father you cited sounds pretty gay. I mean, if you aren't gay for making a gay child molester porn flick, what does constitute you being gay?

 

You just don't get it. You don't know what a pedophile is. No, gay men don't go around raping little boys or little girls. They are attracted to, and sleep with other MEN, not kids.

Do you rape little girls?

- - - Updated - - -

No, I cannot choose to be attracted to the opposite sex. And being gay is not a disease, no matter how many times you try to say it is, it still won't be true.

 

So are most men pedophiles? Do you think most men are sexually attracted to little girls? Do you think that a man who rapes a 2 year old girl is having heterosexual sex?

Well that is the point that you have been trying to make all along isn't it?

"Gay men rape little boys."

That is really the story you have been selling.

With that I have some things to do.

I will leave you in peace for awhile- so you can continue try to convince everyone that "gay men rape little boys" without my response for awhile.

 

No, but if I did I would be a hetero pedo, and if I only raped little boys I would be a homo pedo, and if I raped both a would be a biped.

(see what I did with the biped? c'mon that is funny!)

So you are cool with a male teacher in the girls shower room? Even if they don't molest girls and only like women?

Is it enough to just dislike being around the gay lifestyle and values system, or must people be exposed to it...or else?

 

No, it works like this. All of A is B, but not all of B is A. A child molesting man who rapes girls is A, but not B, which represents all straight men.

If a homo rapes a boy, he is a C, which represents homos who rape boys, but he is not D, which represents all homos. You see, you can be an adult loving homo, without being a homo who rapes boys, but you can't rape boys and not be a homo.

 

please stop the charade

now to your assertion; what part of "would you bring your little girls for a sleepover being supervised only by an adult male without a daughter at the sleepover"? do you not understand?

it's about mitigating risks. Much like we don't want men without daughters around the little girls we don't want homosexual men around the little boys. We couldn't be more consistent vs you wanting to unleash the homosexual men upon the little boys

- - - Updated - - -

penis into male anus is homosexual

 

yup, seems straightforward to me

- - - Updated - - -

penis inserted into another male is homosexual. Male fondling another male is homosexual

good luck trying to change the definition