Do Gays care about kids...?

Open, Out-of-the-closet-Gayness, promoted and displayed today joins hands with sexual freedom of the harlots who dress as nakedly as possible and demonstrate they are promiscuous openly.
Gays and Feminists have made the Culture sexually wide open from what was in 1950 a prudent sexless world for kids by design.

What we see in the long run is millions of fatherless children suffering enormous Child Abuse as a result:

CHILDREN NEED BOTH PARENTS

63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. (Source: U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census).
90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.
85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. (Source: Center for Disease Control).
80% of rapist motivated by displaced anger come from fatherless homes. (Source: Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 14, pp. 403-26).
71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. (Source: National Principals A Report on the State of High Schools).
85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. (Source: Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. Of Corrections, 1992).

These statistics translate to mean that children from fatherless homes are:

5 times more likely to commit suicide
32 times more likely to run away
20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
14 times more likely to commit rape
9 times more likely to drop out of high school
20 times more likely to end up in prison

Children from "fatherless families of single mother" homes are*:

15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
4.6 times more likely to commit suicide
6.6 times more likely to become teenaged mothers
24.3 times more likely to run away
15.3 times more likely to have behavioral disorders
6.3 times more likely to be in a state-operated institutions
10.8 times more likely to commit rape
6.6 times more likely to drop out of school
15.3 times more likely to end up in prison while a teenage
73% of adolescent murderers come from mother only homes

Daughters who live in mother only homes are 92% more likely to divorce**
///

http://www.cato.org/publications/con...-state-crime-0



ARE YOU FOR MORE OF THIS???

 

What has fatherless children got to do with gayness?

 

To answer your question, of course not!

I come from a different generation Dave, where most of the kids I grew up with came from a two parent, stable home. We didn't have kids going into schools and shooting other kids back then. Was not even in our consciousness. Heck, I used to take my shotgun or deer rifle to school, so I could leave school and hit the woods during hunting season. We didn't have gangs of kids here, killing other kids in gangs, but this is what my local reality is today. And most all of these kids committing crimes are from homes with no fathers in them.

Now, when one looks at this issue objectively, there is no doubt at all, that in order to actually have a healthy society, this begins at home, and what kind of home it is. We know, without a doubt, that having a stable home with two parents will create the optimum healthy society. And man learned this no doubt from trial and error over the millennia. We could see long ago what a single parent home might create, and we learned from this and created moral codes, and laws to help to alleviate what sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility of the parents would inevitably create, which is societal disorder.

So we should know that a two parent, stable home is what any society needs in order to suffer less from disorder and almost insolvable problems. Yet there are many people who simply will not accept that at all. Even if the evidence overwhelmingly supports it. So that is one problem that we have today, IGNOR-ANCE. The act of ignoring fact, because of an ulterior agenda or motive, usually based upon some disconnected from reality ideological belief.

Now to me it seems obvious why I grew up in a time where promiscuity was frowned upon, and never promoted. Our society then had a stance that did not glamorize such behavior. Also, when I was growing up, attending public school, there was only one kid there who did not have a father. And he was killed during the Korean War. So everyone had moms and dad's at home, with most mom's not having to work, for the pay was good enough that the man could easily support his family. I do not think people today understand just how important that was, in raising up good, responsible kids. Well those times in the 50s and earlier 60s will speak for themselves, objectively, so I won't go on about how that society was totally different when it comes to two parent homes and anti sexual promiscuity.

The culture today glamorizes sexual promiscuity, and irresponsible behavior. And I watched American society morph into what we have today. I am not at all surprised when it comes to the societal problems of today, the gangs, the school shooting, the promiscuity, the disorder created by deserting our common sense. We seem to have regressed as a species, walking away from what we learned as a species over thousands of years. For we know, having learned what creates the most orderly society, what it takes to minimize the disorder, and we just spit in the face of that.

So what could, or would change us back, to sanity? I have no answer for that. I could say a return to religion, morals, but I am not delusional, and do not think that will happen anytime soon. For it would take a different sort of religion to work that out. We have rejected the fantasy based religion of old, with its anthropomorphic gods, and its silliness and even incoherence and contradictions. The only hope I see is if we move towards embracing something much more believable as we see with physicists like Campbell, or with scientists like Sheldrake and others, that might update religion, and make it important again in the lives of humanity. Or it might come from man suddenly embracing the secular rational, that then sees just how important anti promiscuity is, as well as a stable two parent home. Society has to embrace this, but how do we pull that off, given we are in an age of instant gratification of all stripes, where the ego is being worshipped?

 

I am not him, but I would say that the optimal way to raise mentally healthy children is with a two parent, stable, heterosexual home. And so this would prohibit a gay marriage from raising kids up in such an environment.

But for me, being raised up in a two parent, stable, responsible home doesn't exclude gay people from raising up kids. I do not care if the two parents are not heterosexual. I think a heterosexual home is optimal, but it is better for kids to be raised there, than in a single parent home, which is the worst possible scenario for raising up kids. The stats prove that clearly.

 

Fatherless kids appear when Feminists and Gays are OUT, and expressing masturbation, and showing themselves, openly.
They are telling us that the Culture is sexually wide open.
Then, as kids see the Feminists and the Gays acting, and openly displaying themselves, as sexual objects without objections or criticism, they, too, become sexual active as the hormones drive them to so behave.

Culture is the issue, not bedroom acts unseen or spoken about.
Cultures of Gays and Feminists who promote their own open sexual activities and displays, cause fatherless kids to be born.

 

You are doing the one thingnwhich can change American Culture by explaining the trutyh about what happened in 1950 compared to the feminist/Gay culture we see now.

Truth about hurting kids is what will get American mothers to see what feminists/open Gayness does to the sexual behavior of teens and the fatherlessness which follows.
Everyone needs to hear what you say.

 

Id' rather be raised by two Lesbians than live in a orphanage.

 

The rise of one parent home directly corresponds with the increasing number of homophobes in this country. Homophobia is the result of sexually repressed individuals - individuals who are insecure in their own sexuality - who feel the need to lash out at those around them which destabilizes the home.
We have seen a marked increase in single parent homes as result of the sexual repression brought about by Anita Bryant Effect. Sexual repression is responsible for 95% of home violence and spousal abuse which leads to the breakdown of the family unit. Sexual repression is the number one cause of mass murder.

Sexually repressed individuals are 70% more likely to become serial murderers.

Homophobes are sexually repressed individuals.

Do gays care about children? More than homophobes do.

 

Do you feel as strongly opposed to single parents as you do homosexual parents? If so, that's fair enough then I suppose.

 

Gay men make great fathers.

lesbians bring too much politics into the upbringing. Also lesbians are too negative and depressed. I've seen the children, grown up or otherwise, from lesbian mothers. Not a happy bunch.

The children of gay men, however are extraordinarily stable and well rounded people.

Maybe it's just the absence of institionalised feminism in the home.

 

Fathers and mothers are what I propose society work hard to establish for kids.
Alternatives of any kind are always less effective in general for the welfare of the children.

My point was that fatherless kids have great problems and suffer abuses while growing up.
So, I want natural parent to be the rule and aim,
The stats say that any other situation is worse that the natural way.

 

Here are the Stats on alternative methods:



The worst situation seems to be Step Fathers.

Natural parents appear to be the best by far.
Alternatives, like a Gay and the natural father, are almost as bad as the worst.

The two Gays may be fine as ling as the two men stay together.
But the Stats also say 70% of Gay married men divorce before seven years have past:

 

Your most ridiculous statement to date.

Still laughing.

 

That doesn't negate my point that two lesbians is mostly worse for the children than two gay men.

 

I think a greater problem is the continued unrest of feminism(extreme politics)in the home, causig unrest and extra stress.

Rainbow parents are way down the line in the pathological route to the cause of the destruction of the family unit.

 

Oh, look, the 4,000 time you posted this crap about how you think people should be FORCED to marry like cattle.....

HAS IT WORKED YET?????


Why is your hatred for women and gays in the religion thread? OH, that's right, it's ALL about hate ....

- - - Updated - - -

Do gays care about kids?


Do child raping priests care about kids???

 

So you don't think a sexual culture is what leads young people to be promiscuous?

You believe a sexually prudent religious society, like say Iran, has Gays running around in Parades and bragging that man with man sex is OK?
You think that Iran, for instance, has no effect on what the women wear daily?
And, the sex lives they, on their own, decide they will live in front of the whole community is fine, and no one will do anything about it??

For you, culture does matter?

 

I have read this crap from him for years. It makes no sense

 

So clearly by your logic divorce is much more of a threat than gays. Maybe you should switch from being a homophobe to being a divorceophobe.

 

Of course it varies from family to family. Having two parents of the same gender is surely better than having only one parent. The important thing is that we stand up for the right of both single parents and homosexual couples to have children if they see fit - either through pregnancy (including IVF+surrogacy), or adoption.

I agree completely about the dangers of single parent homes however. It's important to have a strong support structure and a loving home to compensate for that hazard.

 

Fatherless children are the result of dead beat douchbag men. Not gays or promiscuous women.

Please stop spamming the board with this bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

But we know that children raised by same sex parents do as well or better than children raised by heterosexual parents.

 

How? How does this cause the FATHER to be a deadbeat?

It always has been.

As it has always been.

How? How do gays cause fathers to be deadbeats?

- - - Updated - - -

Neither homosexuality or sexually promiscuous women have anything to do with fathers choosing to be deadbeats.

 

Do we actually know this? I would not think we have had enough time to actually find out, since gays raising up children is still in its infancy. Am I wrong?

We do know how detrimental it is when it comes to a single parent, the mother, raising up kids. For this has been going on in abundance since the rules for welfare in the war on poverty encouraged single parent homes, as it was tied to the degree of benefits.

And as I said, I think a two parent home is best, even if it is a gay home, as long as the gays stay together. What would make a difference of course is how well society, the kid's peers accept gay marriage. If gay marriage is still frowned upon, or joked about when it comes to the peer groups of the children of gay parents, this would create psychological problems for those kids in gay homes.

The worst scenario looks to be kids raised in orphanages, with single parent homes following that.

 

But we know that isn't true.

Actually studies show children raised by same sex parents domjustmas well or,better than opposite sex couples.