Dr Wood's claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust.

Exactly. Run away. You have nothing. I know it. You know it. Now everyone else knows it without a doubt as well.

 

Yes, I am.

Do you have any contrary?

 

Is this what you believe?

"On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the Unites States. They hijacked four airplanes in mid-flight. The terrorists flew two of the planes into two skyscrapers at the World Trade Center in New York City. The impact caused the buildings to catch fire and collapse. Another plane destroyed part of the Pentagon (the U.S. military headquarters) in Arlington, Virginia. The fourth plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Officials believe that the terrorists on that plane intended to destroy either the White House or the U.S. Capitol. Passengers on the plane fought the terrorists and prevented them from reaching their goal. In all, nearly 3,000 people were killed in the 9/11 attacks."

 

Please stay on topic.

Do you have any evidence contrary to the generally accepted narrative?

 

Do you have any evidence to support it?

 

Yup. Now provide us with evidence that 9/11 didn't happen that way. Of course, first you will have to describe exactly how 9/11 went down in your opinion. It is a well known fact very few truthers actually agree on any one theory. You would think after over a decade of debate they could agree on who did it, why they did it, how they did it, what exactly happened and when it happened. Nope. Just a ton of conflicting theories out there that most truthers believe in even when the theories conflict with one another.

 

fyi: I see Patriot is posting, but since I have put him on Ignore, I am unable to see said posts.


cheers

 

Doesn't even come close....the official version is at least plausable,whilst wood's wacky ideas....

 

I LOVE it when truthers put me on ignore! It makes them look silly when they post their ignorant lies and I rip them apart. Then they just keep going with the lie while not understanding their pants are down around their ankles!

 

"plausable" ? You mean you don't believe it 100% ?

 

Truthers never seem to be able to grasp the simple fact that everyone else follows the evidence. Right now the evidence lines up with the official version of what happened. If other evidence were to come out that refutes the official version, there is some explaining the government is going to have to do. Truthers believe that since their minds are sort of made up that everyone else must be equally cemented in their beliefs. By sort of made up I mean they believe the government or other bad guy of their choice was behind 9/11, but the details change of who, what where, when how and why based on which theory they are currently promoting as true this week. I honestly believe truthers see the willingness to change one's opinion based on the evidence as a weakness, not a strength.

 

Please stay on topic, and stop dodging the question.

Do you or do you not have any evidence contrary to the accepted narrative?

 

Good God Mate, it's everywhere. The official version reads like a 2nd grade reading assignment with drawings in crayon. I can't tell you with 100% certainty what happened on 9/11 but I can tell you with 100% certainty what didn't:

"On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the Unites States. They hijacked four airplanes in mid-flight. The terrorists flew two of the planes into two skyscrapers at the World Trade Center in New York City. The impact caused the buildings to catch fire and collapse. Another plane destroyed part of the Pentagon (the U.S. military headquarters) in Arlington, Virginia. The fourth plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Officials believe that the terrorists on that plane intended to destroy either the White House or the U.S. Capitol. Passengers on the plane fought the terrorists and prevented them from reaching their goal. In all, nearly 3,000 people were killed in the 9/11 attacks."

 

Truthers LOVE to claim the evidence is EVERYWHERE, yet when asked to produce just ONE piece of real evidence, they run like cockroaches when someone turns on the light.

 

the official story is the correct one...100%

 

No you're not....you're just making (*)(*)(*)(*)h up as you go along

 

If it's everywhere, then you shouldn't have trouble producing a source or a link to this evidence.

Please do so.

 

"Plausible" (< ---your descriptive) dose not translate to 100%. Are you retracting?

 

The only thing made up is this:

"On September 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the Unites States. They hijacked four airplanes in mid-flight. The terrorists flew two of the planes into two skyscrapers at the World Trade Center in New York City. The impact caused the buildings to catch fire and collapse. Another plane destroyed part of the Pentagon (the U.S. military headquarters) in Arlington, Virginia. The fourth plane crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Officials believe that the terrorists on that plane intended to destroy either the White House or the U.S. Capitol. Passengers on the plane fought the terrorists and prevented them from reaching their goal. In all, nearly 3,000 people were killed in the 9/11 attacks."

 

How so exactly?

 

It may not translate in truther world,but it does in the real one....

 

You guys are never going to get him to actually submit any evidence. We know he doesn't have any. HE knows he doesn't have any. The fact truthers can't tell the difference between plausibility and what a person believes only reinforces the fact truthers are extremely out of touch with reality. Does one always believe the most plausible theory? Nope. Sometimes the evidence points to a less plausible theory as the correct one. Which one should one believe? The theory the evidence backs up. The fact the official version is by far the most plausible as well as the version the evidence backs up is a fact that escapes the truthers. They can't wrap their poor little minds around the truth any more than a sane person could believe one of their fairy tales without some evidence to back it up.

 

Specifically point to what parts are 'made up' and show proof to back up your accusations....

 

I've never quite understood this "debate" strategy.

 

I think Patriot said: "SO POST THE EVIDENCE ALREADY! Geeze. Is it REALLY that hard to come up with actual evidence? If so, why do you sit there and whine that we aren't looking at all the evidence? "

Since you have him blocked, thought I'd help.

You're welcome.