Eric Holder: We aim to close Gitmo before Election Day

That's the definition of a useful idiot. Isn't it?

 

Yes, it was so bad that closing Gitmo was the first thing he did.
Well, second.
Third?
Fifth?
Hundredth?
Thousandth?
Millionth?
Anyway, he didn't let that "mark of shame"(lol) interrupt his golf game.

 

Obama has gone full tilt leftist now and ripped off the mask. He's not interested in what most Americans have to say, he's convinced his base is about to primary his ass.

It'll be good for him with his base, but the rest of America will loathe him for it, but that doesn't matter to Obama right now. The only thing that he's worried about right now is a primary revolt within his own party.

The political left in this nation is now completely insane. They don't want a Constitutionally limited President. They want a President like FDR who is granted extraconstitutional power to become another benevolent dictator like FDR was.

The leftists in this nation want a benevolent dictator President with extraordinary, emergency powers granted to him, and they are angry that no one is supporting them in that.

 

LOLOL Thanks for the personal attack bash fest! HAHA I'm happy to get you cons frothing at the mouth.

No brainer. Obama gets my vote rather then a destructive Republicant being led along by a dangerous group of idiots that want to send this Country back to good ole days of hell.

 

Personal attack? To state that someone has a political belief is now an attack?

 

Don't worry Mikey. I wont report you and the others for straying away from the topic of the OP to attack a Lib that gets you frothing at the mouth.

 

Ohhh so everything is about re-election! Got it, thanks Eric.

 

lmao well thats a hilarious bunch of unfounded partisan ramblings.

 

Of course it is. Why else would all the Republicants in Congress look utterly ridiculous bashing everything that Obama and the Dems want to pass that the GOP supported BEFORE Obama took office? LOLOL

 

With 9+% unemployment, 16+% underemployment, $4 trillion dollars more debt, near $4 a gallon gasoline and skyrocketing food prices, they're going to need every vote they can get. This administration is a complete failure.

 

Turn about is a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*), isn't it?

 

Please stay on topic. Enough of the breaking the rules of these forums. Thanks in advance.

 

Wait....now your an admitted lib?

I thought a week or so ago you were going to vote for Ron Paul. lmao

 

Nah, Paul won't get the nod. Not to mention, the Tea Party loons don't support him anyway. So he has no chance in hell. He may be old and crazy, but I dig him. But the other idiots running, except for Huntsmen will NEVER get my vote. But once again, Huntsman is too sane for the Tea Party to support.

 

What benefit does that serve?

 

Are you seriously asking what is the benefit of following our Constitution? Wow. Just wow.

 

Party first, always...

Redistributive social and economic "justice" arrives no other way.

Never will his true believer sycophants or complicit media shills dwell on...or even mention Obama's executive order continuing renditions....which are nothing more than top secret, "Gitmoesque activities" occurring in undisclosed locations.

 

The tea party loons?

Ron Paul is known as one of the main founders of the tea party. Heck, he has been called the grandfather of the tea party movement.

learn about politics before you come back here again.

 

Absolutely.

If it was a decision that was sound, he would have made it happen, or at least made a push for it years ago.

He didn't. You know why? Because he got into office and his advisers probably advised him not to push forward.

Now, suddenly with an election around the corner, and Obama desperate to get his base back on his side, he is will to take action for political gain.

Is it not obvious?

Within his base and some left leaning moderates, it was a huge issue last campaign season. Was it not?

 

ive got a job, no debt and I paid 3.67 yesterday for gas

 

not really, didnt both candidates as well as the exiting president say to close it?

it wasnt until obama tried that anyone got noisy.

 

Then why do the Tea Party loons not support him? Surley that irony is strange is it not? LOL

I'll come back when I please.

 

Closing Gitmo (if ever) should have NOTHING to do with elections!! That is appauling that they are using a national security issue to get votes. I know it's done, but to be that blatent about it....disgusing. If it is in our best interests to close it now finally, then it should have been done when Obama first took office. The reason it wasn't done is that is ISN'T in our best interest. Now, Holder will close Gitmo at any cost because he know it is not his concern after Obama is thrown out of office.

Holder should worry about cleaning up the Fast/Furious mess!

 

your contradicting what your saying. but its ok, your lack of political knowledge is well known on this site.

 

Thanks for another flame! LOLOL

Care to answer my question Mikey? Why do the Tea Party loons NOT support the "grandfather" & one of the "founding fathers" of their own movement?