Ever notice how white racists complain...but don't actually say what they want DONE?

nope, I got it...everyone except you is a racist........
Those calling others racist is apt to be more racist than they are wiling to admit

 

I find it laughable that some white folk think it is their concern and responsibility to fix black people...It's like they still believe they have dominion and charge over minorities.

What a bunch of (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) retards.

 

Like Diogenes, I'm looking for the honest white racist. One who not only complains and drums up fear about African-Americans, Latinos, etc......but will openly and honestly state what they want DONE about it?

Naturally, I find almost none. They still like to have some "cover" to deny they are racists, so they won't come out and say they support ...whatever....recinding the Voting Rights Act, Nuremburg Laws for minorities, open season on black men, deportation to Africa, death camps.

 

spoken like a true racist. I guess if you look in the mirror, you might have found him, unless you are black.

 

"I know you are but what am I"....is for Pee-Wee Herman.

How about answering the question...even if you claim not to be one.....what DO white racists want DONE about all these "criminal" minorities. Not just the Latinos (their pat answer for that is "seal the border, kick 'em ALL out").....what about blacks?

Or is the answer already known....and they just can't say it openly?

 

I didn't realize that there was anything that needed to be fixed with black people.

 

Dude,I was raised better than that. I have not considered a man's color, but only his words and actions.
You apparently have been raised to address every issue as racism. That makes me the better man.
And what answer is that? C'mon, say it and stand on what you claim, or run from the field of battle

 

Isn't it amazing how today they love to quote Dr. King and claim how much they admire him, but if he were alive your right he would be labeled a Race Baiter, Troublemaker, etc. just like he was before he was murdered.

 

Actually I think you're right on that, but that's because 1963 MLK falls in with where most Conservatives and Republicans are at. His 1963 I have a dream speech is perfectly in line with that. However by 1968 MLK was a socialist, and supported communist revolutions in the third world. So you can imagine a 2014 MLK would probably be a crazy commie conspiracy theorist.

 

Actually Dr. King was a Visionary and today he wouldn't be fighting the same racist that he was fighting in 63 and 68.

 

OK...I'm not sure what that means. Are you saying he would not have continued to drift outside the mainstream? Or he would?

 

What I am saying is Dr. King would be fighting the same fight he was fighting in the 60s against the same racist he was fighting against in the 60s. His compassion for the poor would be the same today as it was in the 60s. His love for his fellow man would be the same as it was in the 60s. Unfortunately we were robbed of the opportunity of seeing what Dr. King's vision of America would look like in today because he was murdered by a hateful, racist coward or system.

 

How could you possibly know this? Would King not have gone beyond "equality" towards "White people owe us this and that" like 90% of Black advocates? You are just speculating.

 

Sounds like that is what you are doing.

 

I don't know what the basis of your speculation is. Dr King changed quite a lot from 1963 to 1968. Are you saying that he would have stopped his intellectual growth then?

Test case: I doubt there is any record of Dr King's views on gay marriage in 1968, but what do you think they would be in 2014?

My guess is that as a Baptist minister, in 1968 he would have viewed gays as sinners who needed repentance and he certainly wouldn't approved of the concept of gay marriage, if he could even seriously entertain the concept. But I think Dr King 2014 would be very much in support of gay marriage.

So what do you think?

 

I am saying the changes would have been in the right direction.

As a spiritual man he probably would have opposed it, but I doubt if he would have condemned those who are.

 

Now are we talking about the white liberals who keep using black people for votes or the imaginary white racists in your head that you see everywhere around you?

 

Considering the direction he was going to by 1968, would you consider communism as the right direction?

His successors, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both ministers, support it, so I imagine "spiritual" would have gone out the window in favor of politics.

But hey, it's all a big unknowable.

 

You're right. They're paranoid.

 

You typed this with a straight face, didn't you Mike?

 

Sure. What aspect of it do you disagree with?