Evidence for the Holocaust?

1. Einsatzgruppen
2. Several thousand typhus and starvation victims
3. ????
4. 6000000 JEWS WERE GASSED

 

Again: 6 million Jews died. Not all were gassed.

And here's another link with stuff you won't read: http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/#iv

It also deals with the flaws of the theories of holocaust deniers. I have no doubt you are familiar with these theories.

 

Jewish Website: "Zyklon was sold for fumigation...Germans gassed humans."

Cool evidence bro.

 

So you clearly didn't read a word of it.

~ Remove innuendo ~ Focus on the topic, not the member ~

 

In fact I had already read it. It contains no good evidence that the Holocaust occurred.

 

Holocaust-deniers have no proof that the Holocaust didn't happen.

 

It is pretty obvious this is a troll thread.

 

Of course it isn't. I'm asking for the evidence and none has been presented. What makes you so sure "the Holocaust" isn't a lie like Katyn? That's what I'm asking. The response has been incredibly weak.

 

You have been presented with a lot of evidence.

You deny all of it.

How convenient for you.

If Hitler came back from Hell and admitted the Holocaust took place, you wouldn't believe him.

- - - Updated - - -

demanding evidence and then disregarding all evidence presented, is indeed trolling.

 

Rubbish. I got a Wikipedia link to the Einsatzgruppen, a link to a webpage where someone criticises Gemar Rudolf: not evidence of the Holocaust, a link to the Wikipedia Holocaust article with refusal to examine sources. You've presented literally nothing.

Reported for false accusation of trolling.

 

I gave you Eichmann's pre-capture interview. You didn't read it.

I gave you a link to many Holocaust number estimates. You didn't read it.

 

I think it is a troll thread, but I'm not willing to give up yet so I'll roll with it (and try to keep my tongue in check, I promise).

mikemikev, give us a chance. You say our evidence is not good, fine. But you don't clarify what is wrong with it.
We obviously need some guidance in satisfying your scientific standards, so please elaborate what problem you have with our links, except that mine was from a Jewish website.

Speaking of that, do you consider Jewish sources to be unreliable on general principle? If so, you should be easily able to tear their evidence apart and enlighten us.

 

he thinks all Jewish websites and testimony from Jews are lies.

he thinks all testimony from former Nazis are lies.

 

Clearly. But I demand more effort even from trolls.

 

There was a sharp decline in the Jewish global population. So somebody killed off that many Jews. And in such a length of time, must have been very systematic. So there's proof that there was a holocaust.

There's also pictures of all the boney Jews nearly starved to death. Did people starve themselves or force others to starve for a photo op?

Then you have eyewitness testimony from many allied soldiers about liberation of the camps. Some happy, some sad.

 

either 5+ million Jews were murdered or they died due to Allied bombing.

either way, they are gone.

 

The point of this thread is to feign interest in evidence for the Holocaust and to then deny & disregard all of it as lies, Jewish propaganda, testimony under torture, etc etc.

He will then go to his friends at Stormfront and show his buddies how he asked for evidence for the Holocaust and "none" was provided.

That's all this thread is.

 

As I have requested before which censuses do you base that on?

 

I answered your question with a link. ~ Edit/Focus on topic, not another member. ~

 

The point of this thread is a genuine and important historical question. Do not slander and patronise me. If you can only provide hearsay evidence just admit that. I do not consider a supposed "Life magazine" interview a reliable source. That is perfectly reasonable.

 

Then again please, what would be a reilable source in your opinion? An example would suffice, the topic is irrelevant.
Help us out.

 

No you didn't. Link to the post. No post exists.

~ edit/remove reply to deleted ~

 

what WOULD you consider a reliable source of evidence for the Holocaust?

how about Nazi documents detailing mass deportations to death camps, captured by the Allies?

how about trial testimony of Nazis at Nuremberg?

how about testimony of folks who were not on trial but saw what took place at the camps?

let me guess: you will disregard all of that.

 

prove it.

- - - Updated - - -

the Wikipedia article has links to each of the sources, with further info detailing where the census data came from.

help me help you.

 

This thread is for those who have looked at reliable evidence to present it. It is not for me to be assigned homework. If you are not familiar with reliable evidence and are just parroting the accepted tale please do not post.