FBI informant charged with lying about Joe and Hunter Biden’s ties to Ukrainian energy company

Or accusing Trump of rape.

Same thing different letter next to the name. You you are going to tell me how real that is right?

 

One was proven in a court of law in front of a judge and jury

 

No it wasn't. You're thinking about a civil trial that involves defamation.

 

Please read my posts before replying. I said I was NOT "disputing" your posts, because there was nothing factual in them TO dispute.

I don't think there was ANY "name calling". I use memes when dealing with people that may need visual aids to help them understand; apparently they didn't help you.

NO, you insisted on posting the same "evidence", endlessly. So, I endlessly replied, pointing out that your "evidence" was NOT proof of a crime; else Comer Pyle would have impeached President Biden. Which he hasn't and won't, which is what you're calling forecasting; OK you got me on that. I forecast the Comer Pyle won't impeach President Biden because none of the accusations he and you, are calling evidence is proof of anything illegal.

 

The first trial was actually about his sexual assault of Ms. Carrol, for which she was awarded $5 million bucks. So tRaitor tRump lipped off about her personally and got his ass sued for defamation. Which he lost also and will cost him another $.5 Billion before he's through.

 

Moscow isn't a crime. People accusing President Biden and his family of crimes are guilty of falsely inflating unfounded accusations into evidence of guilt, which they aren't evidence of anything. In "anyhow" they're not guilty of crimes you know, except possibly defamation. You seem to know about that one from the E. Jean Carrol case.

 

Yep... it sure is a banana republic...

 

Interesting.... deflection noted..... obviously you can't answer the question yourself whether there were dealings after 2022..

what does it mean to you whether Hunter and Devin did business together after Devin was sentenced in 2022... please explain what your reasoning behind that question....
but somehow you want to create a smoke screen away from the dealing they did have. Hunter and Devin was business partners BEFORE when the documented shady bribery money laundering through empty shell companies to Biden family members...

And remember my liberal friend... Joe does not have to collect money to be involved in bribery, money laundering, and influence peddling...
Joe attending Hunter's business meeting with foreign "contributors" to the Biden family by selling the "brand" is all that is needed...

 

America is NOT a banana republic. Live in Guatemala or El Salvador for awhile, you'll soon appreciate the difference.

 

You are grossly misinformed when one political party weaponizes the DOJ to go after their political opponents to jail and imprison them... WE ARE A BANANA REPUBLIC.

Listen to the man words... communist dictators say those sort of things
"We have to demonstrate that [Trump] will not take power if he does run. Making sure he under the legitimate efforts of the Constitution, does not become the next president again."
https://rumble.com/v34w72i-joe-bide...overnment-to-keep-trump-from-running-aga.html

 

WRONG! Totally LMFreakinAO!
"...Joe does not have to collect money to be involved in bribery, money laundering, and influence peddling..."
^WRONG!
***Joe WOULD have to DIRECTLY collect money (with irrefutable "smoking gun" PROOF) to be involved bribery, money laundering, and influence peddling. Period!
(Sorry to inform any interested party that Circumstantial Bullshit is NOT PROOF)...
Next...

 

"When" a political party does that let me know, BUT, be careful because it won't happen unless tRaitor tRump is elected again.

"Making sure he under the legitimate efforts of the Constitution"

Quite a contrast from tRaitor tRump's efforts on, before and AFTER January 6th 2021.

 

If Agent Oranges has his way, definitely. It's over, it was Russian disinformation, you lose man.

 

Wrong! Lmao...

Yeah? And So WHAT?
Does MAGA have something against The Constitution?
Does MAGA have something against "legiimate efforts of The Constitution"?
Do tell...

 

Was it under oath? Was there a judge? A jury?

 

So you don't deny Biden's communist dictator brown shirt jackboot tactics.....

 

"Making sure he under the legitimate efforts of the Constitution" = "weaponizing the DOJ"
Your communist dictator has done just that.... you made my point for me... this is exactly the way thing are done in communist country, and Biden is doing in this country....
I don't know what communist country you live in, but here in America voters are watching this injustice going on.... and yes the crowds at his rallies and the continued winning in all the states primaries is not to be overlooked.

 

Totally WRONG! Again...Still Batting 1.000 on the scale of Wrongness in this thread...
"Legitimate efforts of the Constitutiion" = VOTING Against Trump in 2024!
^THAT is exactly what Biden meant.
And, any other interpretation of Biden's statement is egregiously misguided.
"weaponizing the DOJ"?

 

Are you claiming weaponizing the DOJ is constitutional?

 

There is NOTHING in OUR Constitution about "weaponizing the DOJ"; even if tRaitor tRump thinks there is.

I made no point FOR you. Only that it's tRaitor tRump that want's to be our "dictator", and he's being cheered on by his "deplorable's".

What? Marching in the street; political parades have been a staple of ALL political factions in the U.S. from the beginning.

I think it's pretty apparent that "I" live in These United States the land I where I was raised, have fought for and will love until my dying breath. The injustice American voters are watching is the unrelenting attacks by tRaitor tRump and his supporters against ALL the institutions of OUR government that MADE America Great.

Damn right it's not being overlooked and neither is his continued rhetoric that makes "HIS" plan to become dictator frighteningly plain.

 

What does being business partners before you have knowledge of criminal activity have on one's guilt? It should be easy to show Hunter was intimately involved in Archer's scheme, but as of yet, you cannot provide any proof and continue to use guilt by association, which is neither a legal or even moral argument.

 

No, that was done way before Biden. A previous president called the Ukraine president to get in touch with AG Bill Barr to open an investigation into a political opponent. That started weaponization of the DOJ where one can use it for political gain.

 

Is a civil trial not in front of a judge and jury?

 

But the trial wasn't about whether or not he assaulted anybody it was about defamation.

So there wasn't a jury trial about any kind of sexual assault at all that didn't happen. It was defamation. The reason why there wasn't a trial regarding sexual assault is because there was evidence to the contrary so she lied.

Also the burden of proof is a lot lower than a civil trial in a criminal trial the burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt and a civil trial it is preponderance of evidence.

 

You are wrong. A jury did find Trump sexually abused Jean Carroll. I'm not sure how you missed it because that was literally one of the verdicts in the case.

The burden of proof is lower, but still occurred in front of a judge and jury.