FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation

Says we always have gotten most of our uranium from Kazakhstan, uses graph showing Canada as where we get most of our uranium.

Uranium one? Canadian.

 

Private company owned by a Canadian.. You know the difference?

Our poster was claiming it was US uranium being sold back to us. LOLOLOL

 

You should stop making declarations of things until after doing your research.

We do not get most of our uranium from Kazakhstan. You destroy your own facts when you do that.

 

it was a Trucking Company so unless you can show us some bridge connecting Russia to the US how in the hell was Russia using a Trucking company to ship uranium into the US?

 

a Canadian company yes it is called a Canadian company because it is based in Canada under Canadian jurisdiction
a Canadian company that also owned uranium mines here in the US and why the sale had to get approval from the US government

 

and your making our argument for us
Why in the hell would we approve the sale of 20% of the US deposits of Uranium when we have to import 85% of it to fulfil our needs
it would be the same as someone starving selling the food he does have on hand
it makes no logical sense but never mind I forgot who I'm replying yo were logic isn't in their vocabulary

 

I am addressing the topic.

You ever find the Uranium One connection?

No? Aww. Fall down, go boom boom?

 

It would be nice if you knew what the hell you were talking about.

It's also damn hilarious you don't understand how things get exported to our country from other countries. OMG! There are things called ships!

Once here, the trucking company would deliver the SPENT uranium -- or "down-blended" which is the kind of uranium they dealt in, to nuclear power plants where it produces thermal heat for the reactors.

Is this too deep for you?

 

Ah that's not how an operating foundation/charity works. They don't donate money to others, they operate with it.

Are you familiar with how audits work? They go thru disbursements above an appropriate arbitrary amount and then verify validity of each of those transactions. They also confirm an appropriate % of all AR and AP with vendors and suppliers. Audits are designed to prevent big scams as you defined. Your scenerio just ain't the case.

 

So no evidence at all, just a report that 'an eye witness" claimed a criminal connection with Clinton.

Okay, I'll buy that tenuous unsubstantiated accusation if you'll start buying the substantiated accusations against both your fearless leader and his "inner circle".

Deal?

 

And that crap John Solomon "article" from Hannity's favorite love-muffin was penned 4 months ago, with what showing since?

Diddly & squat.

This is what Solomon does. Hangs out vague, unsubstantiated
hmmm is this fishy, could be fishy, maybe not, but could be - so here's an imaginary fish for you to smell
lines in his "articles", with juuust enough nebulous meat for the connies to get a woodie over -- then he drops it, and goes onto the next Trump humping slippery carp.

 

I asked before and I'll ask again. Why are we selling Uranium then buying it back? You don't expect us to believe we are selling ours for more money then buying theirs cheaper do you?

 

^ Tragically uninformed.

 

I already did, just because you don't believe it doesn't mean it's debunked or untrue.

 

We don't have Obama's puppet AG's anymore.

 

Laugh away, Mo.

Anyone who makes this ridiculous statement: "Why are we selling Uranium then buying it back? You don't expect us to believe we are selling ours for more money then buying theirs cheaper do you?"

Is, yes, tragically uniformed.

 

It seems that wild arsed unsubstantiated accusations that depend on nefarious motivations is not evidence. Its bullcrap conspiracy theory peddling.

Apply the same criteria to the Trump investigation and you'd be screaming for his scalp.

 

You should be asking Obama and Clinton that question. I don't believe the media (the State approved media) ever questioned the wisdom of selling off our strategic reserve of uranium to Russia to begin with.
Sort of like how they have never questioned the wisdom of assisting Iran in building their nuclear WMD capabilities.

 

Are you speaking from personal experience?
https://studionewsnetwork.com/gover...-14-uranium-back-russia-2016-hillary-sold-20/

Why are you so juvenile and mocking others for being "tragically uninformed" when the same could be said of you?

 

You don't believe, or did you just filter out all the contemporary discussion in the media about it? NO wonder your interpretation doesn't consider the process involved.

I see by your "assisting iran" nonsense you really don't have a handle on the truth. No worries I get it. Facts are such messy things when spouting your "common knowledge".

 

Citing a gatewaypundit article that has long since been debunked.



You too: tragically misinformed, and with a Jim Hoft SMOTI topper!

 

You must learn to read everything that is posted, young grasshopper. I won't always be here to gently correct you.

I did note the media discussed the issue but, as usual, the State Approved Media never really took a critical look and examination of the wisdom of selling off a big chunk of our strategic reserve of uranium to the Russians (the hated untrustworthy Russians, you know).
You can prove me wrong by providing the SAM (State Approved Media) citations that discussed the need to sell uranium to a frenemy like Russia. I eagerly await your reply.

So you don't consider: 1.unfreezing Iranian assets, 2.making huge cash payments to Iran. 3.releasing terrorists and key members of Iran's team illegally trying to develop WMD's we had captured, 4.dropping many sanctions against Iran, 5. opening the world oil market to Iran, 6. mentoring and assisting Iran in their nuclear ambitions 7. this deal makes Iran the de facto neighborhood bully in the region and will necessarily spark an arms race in the most unstable region in the world as the US sides with a gangsterish supporter of terrorism as it is, to be of any help to Iran? Really?.

None of this is of any help to Iran and it's theocrats in your view? Apparently you don't mind saying absurd facetious things to get attention.

 

Calling something "debunked" so you don't have to face unpleasant facts is not a magic way of making information disappear.
Your bluster and childish insults are even more funny when you respond to facts by simply saying, in effect, they aren't true.

If you care at all about your personal credibility, though it seems you don't, you would do well to provide facts and documentation
to support your outlandish assertions.

 

The Clinton charities are the liberal version of televangelism ministries. Liberal devotion to the Clintons is cultish. The faithful cannot be persuaded ...