Flat Earth is Going "Mainstream"!

Making things up is false witness. It a violation of one of the commandments.

 

They do not disappear on a flat surface the way the ship did in the video. They do not become obscured BY the surface as they move away from you as you saw the ship do.,

 

Nope not "disappearing." Being blocked. You are bearing false witness again.

Besides those ships are less than 20 miles out to sea. As your own photos have proven, we should be able to see hundreds of miles (if not thousands) before things "disappear"

Use your common sense, like you constantly tell others to do.

Still waiting on your proof the 1972 photo of the Earth is "fake."

 

Oh, my bad. I agree, they are actually not disappearing, they're really still there. I shouldn't use disappear though I think you know what I mean.

 

The water is obscuring it as it dips below the horizon. Which is impossible on a flat earth.

As is the endless other pieces of evidence in your face which you lie about such as photographs which you dishonestly claim are CGI without a speck of proof for your claim.

YEs everyone knows what you mean and what you mean is you childishly refuse to face evidence

 

Have you asked yourself why there is only one continent in day time?

 

Wow that's progress.

And since you agree the ship is not "disappearing," but is being obstructed by the water, and since your own source shows you that you can see hundreds of miles without things "disappearing," and since you admit parallel lines do not intersect, the water on the horizon could not be obstructing the line of sight to the ship if the Earth were flat.

And yet it is.

Your own common sense tells you there's a curve.

Use your own common sense, like you tell everyone else.

 

No.

 

Asked and answered.

because the earth is round.

Much the same way you can easily talk to someone on the other side of the world and have them use their webcam to prove it is night time there while it is day time here or vice versa.

Easy and simple proof that the earth is round as it is physically impossible for a flat earth to have one side light and one side dark from the sun.
You have been shown that fact as well and you simply lie about it

 

I am not talking about Catholicism I am talking about science and biased people with biased senses are not a good measure of what things are.

there is no way I could possibly care less about your bitch with the Catholic church. I view all religion is having a void when it comes to credibility. Religions sole purpose is to deceive.

So if you want to get into a pissing contest about which religion is worse I'm not interested.

stuff your images where the sun doesn't shine. The concept of a spherical Earth comes from ships disappearing Over the Horizon this dates back thousands of years before cameras before space travel.

see asbo e south regard to images.

what's the principal?

 

that is incorrect things only fault downward from your perspective if you had someone standing on the other side of the planet and they dropped something from your perspective it would fall upward. Gravity is a property of mass if you are standing on an object that is more massive than you and you're holding an object of smaller mass and you let go of it it will automatically be attracted to the object of larger Mass. Pressure is not even part of the equation

 

It seems the video is only glitching because he didn't want to have people watch the entire time it took. But if you pay attention you will see the camera is being raised and lowered. At the beginning place your finger at the water line near the edge of the vid. You will see some trickery is taking place.

 

Yes.

you just said it is theoretical. You did not say it was hypothetical. Theoretical means that they're absolutely are demonstrable observable experiments and evidence that support the theory. If there wasn't it would not be a theory.

was that would be an incorrect assessment of the argument. The fact that things fall to Earth prove that the Earth which has more density more mass then people attract people back to it. The fact that there is what you called gravity demonstrates mass attracting Mass.

 

Of course the film is being taken by hand and there is some movement from the hands holding the camera but there is no movement from the camera to account for the ship disappearing below the horizon

There is no trickery merely massive evidence proving you wrong

You are lying again.

Do not ever preach or quote the bible or claim to be a christian again you willfully lie and sin worse than any used car salemsan

 

Yes, but if they had the cameras we have today, (83x optical zoom/166x Dynamic Fine Zoom super telephoto NIKKOR lens), they would have seen the boat disappear, zoomed in and seen it reappear. The argument would have fell "flat".

 

Among many other things you can observe with your own eyes without photographs, for example:

There no edge to the Earth where we observe longer hours of sunlight which would be the case if it were flat.
If you fly the same direction around the earth you end up where you start.
Polaris does not move in the sky, which it would do if all the heavens revolved around the Earth.
Cassiopeia and the Big Dipper appear to revolve around Polaris and not the Earth, which would not happen if all the heavens revolve around Earth.
Stars near the Equator appear to make large arcs around the sky while those closer to the poles make small arcs around the pole.
The position of Polaris in the sky varies geometrically with latitude, which would not happen if the Earth were flat.
One cannot see Polaris from the Southern Hemisphere, which you could do if the Earth were flat.
One cannot see the Southern Cross in the northern latitudes, which you could do if the Earth were flat.
There sunlight on only half of the Earth at one time, which would not be the case if the Earth were flat.
Meridians of longitude get closer as you travel closer to either pole, which would not happen if the Earth were flat.
The length of parallels of latitude get shorter as you travel closer to either pole, which would not happen if the Earth were flat.
It is irrational to assume thousands of scientists, astronauts, pilots, and travelers over centuries have engaged in a massive conspiracy falsifying evidence to try to make a supposed false claim the earth is round.

JRR has been asked to explain these items that prove the earth is round and not the center of the universe multiple times and just ignores the requests.

 

Check out the video in my response.

 

That is not at all what theoretical means. Allow me to help you.


the·o·ret·i·cal
THēəˈredək(ə)l/
adjective

1. concerned with or involving the theory of a subject or area of study rather than its practical application.
   "a theoretical physicist"
   synonyms: hypothetical, abstract, conjectural, academic, suppositional, speculative, notional, postulatory, what-if, assumed, presumed, untested, unproven, unsubstantiated
   "it's just a theoretical situation"
   • based on or calculated through theory rather than experience or practice.
     "the theoretical value of their work"
     synonyms: hypothetical, abstract, conjectural, academic, suppositional, speculative, notional, postulatory, what-if, assumed, presumed, untested, unproven, unsubstantiated

 

I did and it proves you wrong
As usual so once AGAIN do not claim to be a christian when you constantly lie

 

Of course. Everybody who has posted thousands of photos or seen buildings or ships as they are obstructed by the horizon over the centuries is in the massive multi-century conspiracy.

 

There you go with disappearing again. You just admitted that they don't disappear, and now you're bearing the same false witness yet again.

 

I would ask you what pressure buoyancy electromagnetism and magnetism had to do with density.

That is a cute operation of the mental gymnastics but I would say you are under a burden of proof. You must show that mass is only affected by pressure and not gravity.

 

no they would not have things don't disappear.

 

the dictionary only describes how words are used. it does not prescribe meaning.

We are talking about science so when I say something is theoretical I necessarily mean that it is scientifically theoretical.

Allow me to help you

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested, in accordance with the scientific method, using a predefined protocol of observation and experiment.[1][2]Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific knowledge.[3]

 

Driving around your neighborhood does not turn your neighborhood into a sphere.




This should help.