Flynn, Comey, and Mueller: What Trump Knew and When He Knew It

Nahhhh, he is a short timer and you know it.

 

Any day now, right?

 

What time is it again? No hint needed......

 

Mueller is an unelected bureaucrat that has to get a conviction on the President or he'll appear to be a failure. That for him is motivation to pull any tricks he can find. That is ALWAYS the problem with a special prosecutor. Justice to him is absolutely no concern to the delight of all the TDS ridden "Resistance crowd" who pray to their gods every morning that this election is overturned.

 

Ah, very different issue.

 

He fired Comey to protect admitted felon mike Flynn. It just didn’t work.

 

Then what was obstructed?

 

He fired Comey on the recommendation of Rod Rosenstein.

Comey's crimes that have been exposed since his firing justifies said firing.

Oops!

 

Obstruction of justice doesn’t require success
Just ask Bill Clinton

 

That’s not what he told Lester Holt

What crime was Comey charged with?

 

Ask Clinton if that UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT Ken Starr didn't chap his hide in '98 and as I recall,. that UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT Leon Jaworski sure shoved it up Dick Nixons wazoo in '74nafter Nixon Fired another UNELECTED BUREAUCRAT named Archibald Cox. That is why many people called Nixon a Cox Sacker....

 

A true patriot would never have taken the job to investigate a president who a day before turned him down for director of the FBI.

A true patriot would never hire only Democrats to investigate a Republican.

Mueller is the farthest thing from a true patriot as one can get.

 

Many of the officials involved in the Trump investigation will be very lucky if they avoid spending a lot of time in a federal pen.

“That all of these officials committed major crimes can hardly be disputed. In January, CNN reported that Flynn’s calls with the Russians “were captured by routine U.S. eavesdropping targeting the Russian diplomats.” That means that the contents of those calls were “obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of [a] foreign government,” which in turn means that anyone who discloses them — or reports them to the public — is guilty of a felony under the statute.”
THE INTERCEPT, The Leakers Who Exposed Gen. Flynn’s Lie Committed Serious — and Wholly Justified — Felonies, By, Glenn Greenwald, February 14 2017.
https://theintercept.com/2017/02/14...mitted-serious-and-wholly-justified-felonies/

 

Who cares what he told Lester Holt? I mean, besides delusional libwingers in full-on meltdown mode since Nov 2016?

 

STARR INDICTED NO ONE.
Starr PRESENTED HIS CASE TO CONGRESS, IOW , EXACTLY WHAT I SAID THE GRAND BUFFOON can do..PERIOD.....der.....umm...duh...

You can't even keep your own BULLSHIT STRAIGHT, can you?

The Grand Buffoon CANNOT INDICT THE POTUS, contrary to your REPEATED CLAIMS HERE...if he thinks he has proof of a CRIME or CRIMES , involving the POTUS, HE CAN PRESENT HIS CASE TO CONGRESS,PERIOD.


Der....

 

Far more serious crimes than ANYTHING they have found in the Witch Hunt....the WITCH HUNT IS THE CRIME....

 

Anyone who wants to know the truth should

 

Trump is a Russian puppet...........it's a national security issue. That's why a true patriot is on it like a dog on a bone.

 

Scotus has never ruled on that, it’s just a DOJ guideline. Since you think the DOJ is a deep state swamp, we should see if scotus agrees.

 

He can drag him into court like Starr did Clinton...

 

Clinton wasn't impeached for firing someone in his own administration,, was he?

He obstructed NOTHING. He FIRED an incompetent, duplicitous LIAR, in agreement with the recommendation of the incompetent, duplicitous LIAR's supervisor....as well as in his OWN VOLITION = his right AS POTUS.

Please cite the CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRCTIONS on who and WHY he can fire members of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH.

 

I guess ol Lester can be Moron Mueller's star witness.

 

The fear of Mueller is understandable. Just look at Trump...........

 

Bullshit. That s EXACTLY what the Founder's STATED was the purpose of Article II, Section 4.

Here's one of the FRAMERS, explaining it for the DULLARDS:


But what happens if the president is convicted by the Senate? Here’s the constitutional answer:

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

A reasonable interpretation of this provision is that it sets out a temporal sequence: Impeachment, then conviction and removal from office -- and only after that, indictment, trial, judgment and punishment.

Alexander Hamilton seemed to read the provision exactly that way: “The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”

That means you can’t indict and try a sitting president. He has to be removed first.


Why do you think Clinton was NOT INDICTED IN A CIRCUIT COURT for PERJURY and OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE? Der...