Fourth Circuit Rules Against Prayer Before Legislative Meetings.....

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MMC, Jul 15, 2017.

  1. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is ludicrous to quote Thomas Jefferson on this topic, since he raged against the Supreme Court declaring it had ANY authority over the President or legislative branch of government whatsoever. It was an unconstitutional power federal courts conveyed to themselves claiming English law (ie "common law") gave them the authority, when the USA had just fought a revolutionary war for independence specifically to be free of English law.
     
  2. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At least you are willing to disavow your own message as a "non-sequitur."
     
  3. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clearly, President Obama should have been enjoined by a federal court from continuing to do so.
     
  4. JakeJ

    JakeJ Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    27,360
    Likes Received:
    8,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This results not only from the provision that no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the states the powers not delegated to the United States. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the states, as far as it can be in any human authority."

    Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Miller, 1808.

    Jefferson recognized the prohibition ONLY applies to the federal government and not to states.
     
  5. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,195
    Likes Received:
    51,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yup. They can fix this in a jiffy and then get going on everything else that needs fixing.
    [​IMG]
    RUMBLINGS: Supreme Court Justice Kennedy Will RETIRE ‘Any Minute Now’
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2017
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,300
    Likes Received:
    39,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Me: Can I walk into any courtroom and start giving a political speech?

    You betcha.
     
  7. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,300
    Likes Received:
    39,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree itbis ridiculus these government officials believe that have to use a government setting to engage in their private religious ceremony. And I'm acting like a conservative and not engaging personal religious faith of some into our government function, thus giving them respect, and keeping government out of those religious faiths.
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just read that the forth is actually the most liberal court now, that would explain their unicorns and stardust understanding of the constitution.
     
  9. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, no free exercise thereof.
     
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,300
    Likes Received:
    39,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure on your own time and your own dime, not as a government official in a government surrounding.
     
  11. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one one the left appears to complain when democrats do it.
     
  12. 3link

    3link Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    10,764
    Likes Received:
    4,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah! No MONKEY ****** is gonna tell you when and how to pray. M I rite mr grand dragon?

    Seroiusly though you disgust me sir.
     
  13. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh my , I care .
     
  14. 3link

    3link Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    10,764
    Likes Received:
    4,399
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course not. Care requires shame.
     
  15. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you a Democrat ? Hillary voter? Talk about shame !
     
  16. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,300
    Likes Received:
    39,260
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not on the left
     
  17. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,195
    Likes Received:
    51,856
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BAKE MY CAKE OR SUFFER THE PENALTIES: As Ed Driscoll reported yesterday, the D. James Kennedy Ministry is suing SPLC, GuideStar, and Amazon over “Hate” labeling. I’ve had a chance to go through the Complaint, and my view is the defamation claims may have enough merit to proceed, the Trademark claims are weak, but the most interesting thing — and what may be the most impacting aspect of this suit — is the claim under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 4 2000(a), which the Plaintiffs point out:

    “Because the Amazon Defendants are operating a public accommodation(s), it is a violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically 42 U.S.C. § 2000(a), for the Amazon Defendants to deny the Ministry the privileges and advantages of the AmazonSmile program on the basis of the Ministry’s religion and the beliefs that are inherent to that religion.”

    Now here’s where it gets interesting. If the Commerce Clause gives government the authority to trump a businessman’s personal beliefs, even if couched as a First Amendment expression, then the same logic that requires Christian fundamentalists to bake “gay” wedding cakes against their beliefs ought to mean that Amazon has no right to deprive the Ministry of a public accommodation because they “don’t like” that Church’s view on gay marriage.

    I’m betting if Amazon doesn’t settle, that this issue is headed to the Eleventh Circuit, and maybe even SCOTUS. This is right in Justice Gorsuch‘s wheelhouse. Stay tuned.

    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/the-hidden-religious-freedom-clash/
     
  18. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So just eliminate the program.
     

Share This Page