I`ve never heard of terrorism being permitted, excused, supported or otherwise logically explained away to be a rational for a defense. You are the first. So, if terrorism is perfectly fine to defend against nothing then I`m sure that carpet bombing is just perfectly ok with you in order to try and take out the terrorists?
Who said it's fine? I just explained that "terrorism" is Hamas' only means to defend themselves from Israeli aggression (and oppression).
Well if it wasn't fine then you would not have said it was the only means for them to use. Now you are saying it is not fine for them to do this? If so then please explain how deliberately targeting and hopefully killing a civilian who is doing nothing is defense against aggression considering the civilians are doing nothing save walking around doing what civilians do. If this is remotely viable for usage then you would have to agree that if Israel decides to carpet bomb Gaza and kill every man woman and child there it would fit in with your zany terrorist abiding rational
Where do you suggest the Palestinians go? The European Jews had options.. They could have treated the people of Palestine with some regard .. Where else could the European Jews find sanctuary before and after the Holocaust?
With all due respect your response here seems a little disoriented. The Jews were returning to the sole Jewish country in the World from the Diaspora. The Arabs had and still have 21 such Arab countries created for this UNIQUE purpose (the ingathering of all Arab refugees) in this past century... Why then Kuwait and Saudi Arabia got rid of their Arabs that came from this area flaunting the title of Palestinians?
Don't be absurd.. Jordan accepted about a half million Palestinian refugees circa 1948 -1967.. and they are a poor country that has never gotten but a pittance in US foreign aid.
