Maniac Mark and pathetic Patricia McCloskey were indicted by a grand jury for pointing guns at and threatening protesters. More evidence that BLM is steering the US away from racism and white extremism. No doubt that Maniac Mark and pathetic Patricia McCloskey will claim in court that their best friends are black protesters whom they want to protect themselves against. Will this warn off other maniacal white supremacists? I think not. https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...t-louis-couple-who-pointed-guns-at-protesters
https://www.reddit.com/r/ActualPubl.../black_trump_supporter_attacked_by_white_blm/ Those crazy white supremacists are at it again.
"The outcome was ordained when it was referred to a grand jury that deliberates in secret. The US justice system is corrupt and allows secrecy in proceedings in a grand jury. If the justice system was not corrupt, grand jury proceedings would be publicized and open." -Denzien http://www.politicalforum.com/index...taylor-decision.578742/page-7#post-1072071802
These are the kind of people that Republicans made heroes of at their last convention. No one in the party was wise enough to voice any reservations. That's what happened to the GOP with Trump.
Why would they voice reservations any differently now. There is no question as to the events that took place. The Mayor of Chicago used around 50 armed police officers as security around her home to stop the exact events which took place at the McCloskey's home. ‘I have a right to make sure that my home is secure’ - Lightfoot https://www.chicagotribune.com/poli...0200820-s563zjj4uzc2rcbprrruzalwaq-story.html
Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons (4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner 5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (, (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031 563.031 - Use of force in defense of persons. (3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section.
That was supposed to read 'I wonder if this should be a no harm no foul situation and just not charge or indict anyone'
This verdict was obvious though we’ve had many “mistakenly” equate aggressive acts with self defense clouding issue after issue.
Warn them off from what? Defending their own property? Gun loving Americans of all colors will always protect their property from the terrorist, thug organization known as BLM along with antifa and whatever other group tries to destroy other people's property.
And they are going to be pardoned. Which is excellent, these 2 patriots deserve the ability to defend themselves, and defend themselves they successfully did from the BLM terrorists. That violent mob immediately changed into a “victim” in the face of patriots ready to defend themselves. More evidence the country is turning away from BLM. The recent Breonna Taylor lack of charging multiple officers is also a solid sign BLM is losing the long fight. People are tired of their violence, and false narratives.