Was gun control really about trying to control guns, or was it about amplifying emotions in the gun- and non-gun owner? It was clearly about amplifying emotions in the gun and non-gun owner too, because a revolution can only grow by an increase in emotions in a population. Because when a revolution occurs, there is chaos, and chaos leads to order, and when that new order is in place, the real gun control starts. This is who gun and non- gun owners never should be part of a revolution, which is very hard because things like fear, curiosity (news and politics) or chaos increase level if emotion in millions. An increase in emotions in a majority can lead to a revolution. One of the most effective ways to prevent a revolution is to stop commmunicating. Because than emotions are dropping, because the spread of emotion drops. Gun control increased emotions and communications in society over the subject. A lot of forums started a gun control topics when the subject gun control came on the political agenda and in the media.