http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mercola/fluoride_b_2479833.html I'd rather just take personal responsibility over my dental health and not have to drink fluoride water. At this point, I suppose it would be too embarrassing for the government to admit that adding this crap to the water for all these years was a bad idea. Central planning strikes again.
Oh god. This conspiracy crap again. I suppose they think the Jews and Illuminati are responsible for this. Average IQ is actually going up.
Citing yerself as personal authority ... eh. There's a reason that Autism is at record levels. That todays public school youth are performing very poorly. Our food is literally being Poisoned.Whether by GMO's or aspartame.Most americans are too busy watching stupid TV to notice.Yes,most TV today is downright stupid.It's also being poisoned.God,Church,Truth,the American way are all targets now.It's now fashionable to bad mouth George Washington and Thomas Jerrerson.Talk of doing away with our Constitution. Crazy talk.Just crazy.Yet amercians have been poisoned so they can't quite decipher.As long as most other americans follow along like good sheeple,then it goes unnoticed.The teachers union can pad test scores and reward certain groups { Atlanta had an outbreak of just that }. Teachers were caught red-handed taking home tests and incorrectly grading them. Why would they do that.To have bragging rights.To showcase certain minorities as bright and worthy of special scholarship.
Or we could just play it safe and take it all out. My teeth are my responsibility, your teeth are your responsibility.
It pays to read the cited article. The comprehensive review identifies the possibility of adverse effects from high fluoride exposure upon nuero-development. In turn, it calls for further research on fluoride exposure and prenatal development, and more detailed accounts on fluoride exposure and nuero-development. In other words, a more definitive study of the correlation between fluoride exposure and nuero-development is necessary, not government policy.
Yes, yet the conclusion clearly is attempting to elicit further research on the correlation between fluoride exposure and nuero-development, not government policy. Calls for removing fluoride from drinking water, etc. can be logically deduced as premature.
I believe you have the order backwards. Something foreign is being added to the water supply, and evidence is building that this causes some degree of damage to children. Are you saying that it has to be proven without a shadow of a doubt that it is harmful before the government should stop forcing people to drink it?
No, I am saying that it pays to adhere to the suggestions of the comprehensive review. As the piece indicates, further research on the relationship between fluoride exposure and prenatal development is in order, in addition to more detailed accounts on the relationship between fluoride exposure and nuero-development. This does not mean absolute certainty is necessary, but extensive certainty based upon greater research combined with robustness checks is necessary. The jury is not unequivocally out.
This isn't really any different from what I said above. Sure, they found a correlation and would like to study the matter further to see whether or not causation can be confirmed. If this was for an OTC drug then the consumer could decide whether or not they would like to chance it and assume that the correlation is coincidental. Or they could decide to not buy the drug just in case the correlation looks too risky, at least until further studies come out. This is different, this is forced medication in the water supply.
