So let me get this straight: you see no culpability in Trump for the insurgency when looking at the FACTS of what he said for the last year to his "base", but you DO see a huge election theft where all hard evidence is non-existent.
Not surprised one bit. Opinion on stealing, is just that, those banning such opinion don't understand the First Amendment. They say just read something, but they can't quote it, I'll call them STUPID and IGNORANT, because in debate it is their job to quote it and not ours. The BBC had several quotes, and they had to point out not one would be punishable under the law.
Crime to have opinion, that there is election fraud or election theft, and that's culpability for insurgency, that is lowering the bar so low that the first amendment doesn't exist. "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that believe the election was stolen, and Trump should be President]." (Obama)
Direct quote the crime, in context. "Maxine Waters encourages supporters to harass Trump administration officials (cnn.com)" https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/politics/maxine-waters-trump-officials/index.html That is CNN's opinion, that quote, her quotes are in the article. I don't want to read an Opinion piece, show me Trump's crime, quote the actual quotes that were illegal crimes.
So let me get this straight: you see no culpability in Trump for the insurgency when looking at the FACTS of what he said for the last year to his "base", but you DO see a huge election theft where all hard evidence is non-existent.
I call people who believe that trump holds no responsibility vis a vis the riot STUPID and IGNORANT. They should not be able to vote.
I just pointed out in another topic what I think of the election, with regard to theft, you on the other hand have NOTHING either quotes of his or mine, and let us deal with that, that would suggest I "DO see a huge election theft where all hard evidence is non-existent." Rules don't allow me to say what should be said.
I think you are wasting your time. Certain people live in an Alternate "Reality". Things that make ZERO Sense... Some people exist that (actually) believe these things: 2+2=5... Trump didn't incite the riots... Bigfoot Exists... The Election was "Stolen"... The Earth is Flat... It seems like a real waste of time (and energy) to try to "debate" people who won't face reality. Anyway, back to the topic, I think that even if a Senate Trial is (eventually) held, it seems extremely unlikely that there will be 17'GOP Votes to Convict Trump.
No, requiring a certain threshold of intelligence to weigh in on national matters is reasonable. It has nothing to do with race.
Landslide Landslide Landslide Stolen Stolen Stolen. Upset you pissed a paycheck away on #stopthesteal?
President Trump said: "Let's blow up the White House!" Oh wait, that was Madonna! Did she get prosecuted? President Trump said: "Lock a 10-year old in a cage with child molesters!" Oh wait, that was Peter Fonda about Barron Trump. Did he get prosecuted? President Trump said: "We need another John Wilkes Booth!" Oh wait, that was Johnny Depp. Did he get prosecuted? President Trump said: "I fantasize about standing over Donald Trump Jr's dead body!" Oh wait, that was Tom Arnold. Did he get prosecuted? President Trump: "Held up a bloody decapitated head with the likeness of the President!" Oh wait, that was Kathy Griffin. Did she get prosecuted? President Trump said: "I would like to punch him in the face!" Oh wait, that was Senator Corey Booker about Trump. Did he get Impeached? And there is so much more than this! And these people and those that align with them question where hate speech comes from blaming President Donald Trump!
<COMMENTS EDITED> But, maybe you should find some examples of others who have rallied armed forces to attack congress, with deaths and destruction resulting from the attempt to overthrow our democracy. And, the idea that you see overthorwing our form of government as similar to Tom Arnold admitting to fantasizing about Trump Jr. hits me as REALLY DERANGED. Do you see our government as having ANY value?
Stunning. Personally I've never been a fan of the "manifestation thru desire" coping mechanism to fashion one's reality.
Wow. Amazing. You don't know that this isn't about words unless they have incentivized, urged, prodded, instigated, or prompted criminal action. Then they fall under US Code 2383 and can be prosecuted.
You mean like Joe Biden saying, "I would like to take Trump behind a barn to beat him!" A direct attack on a sitting President. Incite the masses!
So you admit to the left's personal attack against the President for four years? Unity! What is that again?