100% agree, but you should link the evidence that shows the towers didn't hit the ground as solid matter. Here is a little bit: http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html#Scientific Much more in the link for anyone interested.
EG does not do requests for information even from his fellow truthers. Woods' cheerleaders can only pretend the book is worth buying. They can't actually defend it any better than Wood can. Better luck next time.
Here's a fact filled article on Dov Zakheim, the Zionist who was the comptroller during the time period in which Rumsfeld made the announcement of the missing trillions. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/16/18467275.php?show_comments=1 I guess Rumsfeld didn't know what he was talking about. It's all that incompetence associated with 9/11.
Kevin Ryan's article delves deeper into pre 9/11 WTC security and also discusses some of the companies that were associated with it who stood to profit from the attacks. http://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/2950 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7GDa-L4hHHo
http://solari.com/articles/missing_money/ http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0605/S00345.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=paWiZ2Y8fRg&feature=endscreen
geeze,5 nonsensical posts by holston in a row....what, is he looking for a number of posts record? I've noticed a lot of his posts could be just one post..
What specifically about them was non-sensical.....I'm sure you have a whole point by point critique, correct?
ALL of holstons crap is old,rehashed bogus crap.......And I notice you don't hold himto the sae standard,just swallow his posts,smile and say 'more'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZAHp_zSGd8 [video=youtube;vZAHp_zSGd8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZAHp_zSGd8[/video]
Yet box-boy gage hasn't been able to refute the THOUSANDS of eywitnesses to the planesflying into the towers.....
Here's a fact filled article on Dov Zakheim, the Zionist who was the comptroller during the time period in which Rumsfeld made the announcement of the missing trillions. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/12/16/18467275.php?show_comments=1 I guess Rumsfeld didn't know what he was talking about. It's all that incompetence associated with 9/11.[/QUOTE]
Gage is not a disinformation agent. Of course planes flew into the towers. You are attributing to him views which he does not hold. This is the same as lying. Didn't your Mother teach you that lying it wrong? Never mind, lying is alright as long as the lie is to a non-Jew. http://rense.com/general92/talmud.htm This explains why they lie so glibly.
Anyone that believes that the Towers weren't hit by airplanes is a complete moron, there is no other way to say it. I've debunked this missing trillions junk a thousand times. You're lying again, Holston. I've debunked the stupid Dancing Israelis that you've trotted out. When are you going to face the lies that you've posted here, and refute some of the evidence I am putting forth? Why do you ignore the facts instead of confront them? Why do you push an anti-semite agenda?
Because that's all lying anti-Semites (read: 'truthers') know how to do. Holston is down to copy/pasting the same old debunked words because, like the lemming, he cannot think for himself.
All you can do is sit there and play games and hope someone thinks you're intelligent. You can't tell us what you believe or don't believe, which obviously means you also can't back up your claims. You keep it nice and generic so nobody can pin you down on any one point. That sound about right to everyone? How about it Pimp? Tell us what you believe actually happened on 9/11. Be prepared to show evidence that backs up what is sure to be a steaming pile of bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
Do you want to tell the readers which portions of the article about Zakheim is false? The lemmings in this country are the ones who think and behave according to the dictates of the Zionist/Khazar media machine. What has been debunked is the 9/11 Commission Report. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404 You can say that I am lying, which you have over and over, and hope that they will just take your word for it, OR you can point out the lie itself and then show why it is a lie. This would be a much more convincing way to show everyone how it is that I am lying by putting up information which anyone can find for themselves if they have a desire to. The way you are going about it now will persuade only the laziest most gullible folks who already have decided what they want to believe. But those who are independent of mind, evenly skeptical of everyone, and desirous of the truth will not be convinced of anything based on your accusations alone. The fact that you seldom if ever address the issue itself in preference of making personal attacks on me, would lead one to believe that you are only attempting to persuade the dullest people of all. Those are the ones most likely to act like lemmings. They are also those who fear most the name calling Zionist apologists are so fond of doing. If calling people liars and anti-semites is all you ever do, then eventually all you will wind up with for supporters will be non thinkers and people who conform for no better reason than cowardice. All the rest will be people who are just unable to ever admit it when they make a mistake or are wrong. This kind of stubbornness that refuses to change for the sake of being contrary is more kin to the Jack Ass than the lemming.
Did YOUR mother tell you falsely accusing others of lying was wrong?I made a mjistake is all,and I'll own up to it.
I know enough, to know I know nothing! You apparently take evidence with no chain of custody, or independent verification as facts. I don't have to try and look smart when debating with you, contrast accomplishes this for me!
No, I read his posts. You should try it! Just like with anyone, sometimes their is great information in them, and sometimes the information is suspect, and makes jumps in logic I would not. This is what happens when people who haven't been programmed through marketing think for themselves, they tend to disagree! Unlike Sheeple who somehow always end up on the same page, and in agreement.
holston has been posting that 4 TRILLION (with a 't') has gone missing and the defense department is the suspect.......when george bush left office,the national debt was 10.5 trilli8on or so.......are we to believe they can't find what amounts to 40% of this countries debt,since it was founded? girl at the olympics had the same exp[ression on her face as I do now..
You really are in love with that term aren't you? http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050523112738404 I really like this point taken from the link above. The Pentagon gave us 5 frames from a film as "proof" of the attack on the Pentagon. The best one can tell by examining these photos is that it appears that a missile hit the Pentagon, not a plane. This notion is backed up by another film taken from across the road that shows the explosion but no plane prior to that. One can't help but wonder how that "plane" managed to fly into the Pentagon undetected. By the time the Pentagon was struck, we are supposed to believe that either no one in the Pentagon had gotten the word, they were all sitting around dumbfounded, or they didn't have sense enough to be on guard. Then we are supposed to believe that every gas station and motel in the surrounding area had more security surveillance than the Pentagon! I just want you guys to know in no uncertain terms that we are not all the Putzes you take us to be. Your arrogance and methods of argumentation, more aptly described as the lack of them, can't do anything but make people who already are on to you even more determined to see you brought down from your high horse. You call opposition to Jewish hegemony "anti-semitism", If anything is a "steaming load of bull(*)(*)(*)(*)" that is. 21. The omission of the fact that pictures from various security cameras---including the camera at the gas station across from the Pentagon, the film from which was reportedly confiscated by the FBI immediately after the strike---could presumably answer the question of what really hit the Pentagon (37-3. Now why wouldn't the FBI want to lay the matter to rest? I assume for the same reason that they didn't bring Bin Laden to the US for interrogation and to stand trial or at least his remains. By their secretive behavior you'd think that certain members of government and intelligence like all the suspicion, controversy, and doubt they've generated. They must not trust the American populice to be able to "handle the truth". This would make a lot more sense if the Zionists were behind it all. Then there would be a very good reason to hide things considering the direction they are taking this country.