Read the post. Better yet, read the book by Bernie Lewin. SEARCHING FOR THE CATASTROPHE SIGNAL:The Origins of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
I will go with scientific American ANY day of the week How about the American Journal Of Physics? https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/artic...settled-What-Climate-Science-Tells-Us-What-It
. And because the link is from the internet it's gotta be true, right? Oh, and ame answer on your link - members of the politicoscience cabal.
Yes, of course they do. No, they were only grossly -- and deliberately -- misinterpreted by the exculpatory tribunals convened to whitewash the wrongdoing.
SciAm has been unreadable woke trash for decades. Which tries to gainsay Koonin's critique, and fails utterly.
Ahhh! But being on the internet does not automatically make it untrue. This is where the skill of being able to critique and analyse information is invaluable Critical analysis also assists in preventing world view bias A fear of validating points shows the person is afraid to disrupt their world view
Your link concerned events 28 years after the events under discussion and was, therefore, irrelevant.
That's because he's a historian. The accounts given by major climate science players are the heart of the book. You are just denying.
This is just another (unfortunately unsurprising) attempted attack on a person to avoid discussion of the substance.
'The blog starts from the premise that “there is insufficient evidence to make the claim that CO2 emissions are causing catastrophic global warming.”' I.e., Desmog claims that starting with an indisputable fact of objective physical reality disqualifies Lewin's blog from consideration. Desmog thereby merely disqualified itself... as if it hadn't already done so long ago.
Bull. I'm not going to read his book. And, the issue is what the vast majority of scientists\ know today. You can go back to Kyoto and find mistakes. The whole direction of assembling an approach to climate change is been fraught, especially as America has so often worked against any international cooperation.
The post was not addressed to you. Lewin noted: "Many of those who participated in the events here described gave generously of their time in responding to my enquiries, they include Ben Santer, Tim Barnett, Tom Wigley, John Houghton, Fred Singer, John Mitchell, Pat Michaels . . . and many more."
Wasting my time with twaddle that boils down to Get back to me when you prove that it does not fit this criteria
Questions to ask yourself: Is there an more CO2 in the atmosphere now than 100 years ago? Does CO2 come from the burning of fossil fuels? Is C02 a greenhouse gas? Is the average temperature of the Earth rising? Does the rising temperature of Earth correlate with the rise of CO2? If you can answer every question yes, then anthropogenic climate change is real.
Well, I can answer one of them "no" pretty easily. Correlation does not equal causation. https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
