that's idiotic. ever heard of 3D printers? do you think the military and the police will stop demanding normal capacity magazines. You clearly haven't a clue about this issue that the dishonest government violates the constitution is not an argument for it pissing on the document even more
Are we incorrectly labeling criminals something they are not, like mentally ill? Let's find out why certain people resort to using violence as a means for solving whatever ails them, and then we can stop blaming and scapegoating inanimate objects like guns, knives, fists, or whatever for the reason we have record highs in homicides. Let's stop pretending people turn to crime for kicks and start acting like we care. Let's address the root causes for criminal behavior instead of blaming responsible people who have the right to own property such as guns. Truly, I think the Democrats have pandered to the anti-gun crowd for votes. Instead, they ought to be held responsible for enabling the gun toting criminal behavior of those who are doing most of the killing. Minorities on minorities type shootings in some major blue state run cities in our nation. Get to it, Democrats!
A hypocritical post fully supported by leftists. So, why isn't this post complaining that Biden isn't in jail for openly breaking federal gun laws? This post only supports the jailing of political enemies.
Ban guns so that the black man can crawl through a window to rape and murder a British girl and Italy can falsely accuse a white American girl. So many Italians are pro-Nazi, Pro-Mao, Pro-Stalin.
Maybe not to start. Laws CAN be written after the Constitution, can't they? What Federal Gun Laws did Biden break?
Your list, plus one or two more ideas, will work but it will take generations. As each older generation dies out taking their hardened gun beliefs with them, and as each new generation is subjected to a less gun culture as each generation changes. Those that are pro gun dismiss the argument because they claim the proposed list won't achieve anything overnight, yet we know that, it takes generations. So in effect, it has no effect on the older generation. If they pass a background check, have a secure cabinet, and so on and so on, they have nothing to fear. So are they against this because they know they might be unsuitable to be a gun owner!!
Correct, that's why the 2nd Amendment needs amending, by scrapping the Right to bare arms part. That should be #1 priority.
We will never ban guns: Italians are great producers of guns ... On the other hand, your mention of a "black man" sounds quite racist. Also white men do the same thing, you know ... Then ... In Italy there are Italians who are "pro-Nazi" and "Pro-Stalin" ... but only Chinese migrants are "Pro-Mao" in Italy!
If we go back to the problem ... When you study a process you spot the critical points. Which are the critical points in the legal management of weapons in the United States? One is really evident: there is no real legal management of weapons in the United States ...
Don't tempt me ... At which age can you drive a car in many US states? 16? At which age can you buy a weapon in many US states? 18? At which age can you buy a beer in many US states? 21? What is this? Progressive freedom?
It means that you can drive a car, use a weapon to make a massacre and after some years you will be legally allowed to celebrate it having a beer!
And you will enjoy your beer! What else? In Italy it's a bit different: At 18 we can drive, we can get a hunter license, buy an arsenal and get drunk!
Because the federal government would not give money for roads to the states unless they changed their drinking age to 21.
And which would be the rational reason for this? A lack of control along the streets? Biologically at 18 you manage alcohol better than at 21 ... So that the only reason I can imagine for the American rule is that police street patrols are rare. In Italy we've got not one, but two armies along the streets [State Police and Carabinieri].