In Portland, the Sexual Revolution Starts in Kindergarten

The invaluable Christopher Rufo exposes grooming in Portland schools

Portland Public Schools has launched a war against the “gender binary” and adopted a radical new curriculum teaching students to subvert the sexuality of “white colonizers” and begin exploring “the infinite gender spectrum.”


I have obtained a cache of documents from a source inside Portland Public Schools that exposes the nature of this curriculum. The lessons seek to turn the principles of academic queer theory into an identity-formation program for elementary school students; it has been adopted in many of the district’s K-5 classrooms.

https://christopherrufo.com/portland-sexual-revolution/

In the article he quotes the curriculum so you can all see for yourselves.

 

Im sure the liberal folk on the forum will be able to explain why kindergarten kids need to be groomed like this...

 

Portland is such a crap hole city.

 

Sexuality has always been a part of school since kindergarten. I remember when I went to kindergarten where we celebrated valentines day and were encouraged to make valentines cards for a fellow student. Of course, girls could only make cards for a boy, and boys could only make cards for a girl, and that's how things were done back then.

 

Do you see that as different than introducing the queer theory to kindergarteners, if the article is true? You know since that's what the OP is about.

 

The woke left has lost it's mind.

 

In public school, in the 1980s, it was all about emphasizing the traditional gender roles.

 

In public school, no matter what decade it is, kindergartners are not yet sexual beings. To them, their genitals exist for nothing more than peeing.

 

No, the gender indoctrination process starts as soon as a child is aware of their surroundings. You just don't notice because you don't remember it happening to you when you were young.

 

Wow as an 80's education graduate, that wasn't part of the curriculum I saw. Where did you go to school? May I assume, you don't see it as any different than your valentine's example, since you sidestepped the question?

 

Traditional gender roles being those that are required for the species to survive. The gender subversion on children you support in this thread are genocidal. It will utterly wipe out the population targeted by it. There is a reason that China is spending billions to fund this poison in the West while banning it in their own country. This ideology has a very short shelf life. It will last until China begins taking substantial resources and money from American elites. When American elites start losing their power and wealth, they will turn on the progressive left. In the meantime, I strongly suggest all conservatives pull their children from public schools and press for property tax exemptions for parents of home schooled children. Don't give these people your time, your money or your attention.

 

I agree, not sure on the trans part. Now of course that's the whole point of the indoctrination of the young though, isn't it? It's the whole reason this fight is happening. It's one thing to start noticing boys are different than girls, dads are different than moms, a completely different matter to start teaching less than 1% is the norm.

 

This article says it is from an anonymous source from within the school system and doesn’t really show that this is implemented criteria.

There are a few troublesome parts, children at that age don’t need to be learning biology or more advanced subjects.

Teach tolerance, inclusiveness and basic principles such as reading and coloring. Object identification.

 

So you are fine with indoctrination as long as it is your version of indoctrination? Why not just teach tolerance and let children be children?

I 100% agree that the alt-right need to pull their children from public spaces however.

 

Agree, at that age it should be all about, manners, sharing, inclusion, and learning how core education is exciting.

 

That is a decidedly less fascist stance than the majority of the progressive left. They appear to want federal regulatory authorities to interfere with home schooling and/or the outright ban of homeschooling. Apparently they see the skyrocketing number of homeschoolers as a threat to their power.

I like your idea of pressuring parents to pull their children from schools that attempt trans/groom children.

I hope you hold on to these principles, I respect them. We need to stop the elites that are making very fascist noises. This is some really scary stuff.

 

Were that true, there would be no such thing as a bi- or homosexual, because, as you noted, it used to be standard on valentines day for boys and girls to make valentines for each other.

4-year-old children are not yet sexual beings, and there is nothing you can say to change that fact. There is no reason whatsoever for the kind of indoctrination referred to in the OP to happen to children of that age, ever. Period. End of discussion.

To be frank, that you care to argue against that position makes me question your motivations.

I can't f-ing believe that anyone, let me repeat that, that ANYONE even needs to be told that. I'm the biggest supporter of LBGT rights you'll ever find. I supported same sex marriage before it became cool, and I applauded the Obergefell decision not only because I agreed with the outcome, but also because I think it was properly decided based on the Constitution and the Law. Likewise, even though I happen to be pro-choice, I thought the Supreme Court found the overturning of Roe properly, not because I liked the outcome, but because I thought it was the right decision based again, on the Constitution and the Law. It's a shame that some States are going to make stupid abortion rules, and hopefully we can find some legal way to if not prevent it, than at least mitigate it, but that doesn't change my opinion on the legal merits of the case. And deciding based on legal merits, rather than public opinion, is the Court's job. To do otherwise would be malpractice.

 

I have no issues with parents homeschooling — that shouldn’t detract from funding public schools however

As to trans grooming — whatever that is — I 100% support schools teaching tolerance and not being allowed to discriminate against their students, that includes any institution that receives taxpayer money.

If you want to instill bigotry and hate you should absolutely be able to keep your children at home to do so.

 

I argue the way I do because I remember when I went to kindergarten and 1st grade having existential thoughts and wonderings about topics such as this away back when. Maybe I was the only one?

 

Here is trans grooming. This is what you support. Her entire class, every single one was groomed to come out as trans. This is YOUR "normal". The amount of damage done by this fanatic is off the chart.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KStWMoliDmY

 

I went to kindergarten and first grade in public school in New York, then my parents took me out of it and homeschooled me for the remainder of grade school. But I did go to college.

 

any adult thinking they should be talking to kindergarteners about anything sexual is a predator/pedo its NOT normal to think that kindergarteners need to be groomed sexually for any reason.

 

Did you really just quote a YouTube video that was citing a TikTok video as evidence of some vast conspiracy to turn all children trans?

Kids have played dress up for as long as kids have existed — they have not idea what it means to be trans and unless surgery is being pushed on them then kindergartners saying they are <whatever they feel like that day> is pretty typical.

I remember we were Pokémon when I was a young kid — no one freaked out. The TikToker shouldn’t be teaching unsupervised if she honestly believes an entire class just magically became trans — it’s as bad as allowing vets to teach with no formal educational requirements.

 

So talking about a mommy and daddy is sexual in your mind? What do you feel we should do to individuals that allow children to have boyfriends or girlfriends at very young ages?

Should we ban all children's books that have a kiss in them?

 

Rufo is a sleazy nut.

If you're sane, ignore him.