Indianapolis: Early Morning Jogger Gunned Down for no Reason

I'm not a loon. I don't think those things.

- - - Updated - - -

Unless they weren't being arrested for it, I doubt it. Blacks are attacked all the time in the south by racists. Just like whites are attacked by blacks. You guys just haven't gotten over the 1800s. Time to grow up.

 

They are? Link to a recent event.

 

Post up some stories from this past week. Should be easy, considering it happens "all the time".

 

Yep, that's why we didn't have a single thread here on PF about a shooting down in Florida.......LMAO. I'll bet you posted a few times about George Zimmerman on this political forum

 

Then you're naive for thinking otherwise. Dems desire that their flock to be naive.


Post proof of what you said about the south. And if you are correct, are you saying killings are okay if both sides are doing it to each other? What kind of sickness do you have? White guilt complex? Keep that in mind if a punk black banger walks up on you looking to do you harm. Take whatever he gives you because after all, he 'owes' it to you.

 

Yea, the guy was sent home with the gun and wasn't even going to have to go to trial. The fact you think they are equivalent to an incident in which someone was arrested and is going to jail is hilarious. But that's the Stormfront mentality!

 

Two people challenged you to defend your claim, and you haven't. Why is that?

 

So after Zimmerman was arrested and the wheels of justice were turning you never posted again about it here of PF...........and why do you keep mentioning stormfronts.........is the weather bad in your area.......certainly not a 'political' topic.......

 

Sorry thing is that skin color is so often and indication of behavior, therefore we judge all people of that skin color as the worst, just as a survival instinct precaution.

 

It would appear you are the one living in the 1800s........I live in the South and I haven't seen any stories lately about Whites attacking blacks.....you've been asked to share a link to these stories by two others.......I'll make it three.......

 

Seems to me like your just pissed that he is black.

Or could you provide evidence of his "anti-white stance"...

 

Your talking about one incident; I'm talking about the thousands of incidents that occur yearly.

 

Seems to me you suffer from white guilt.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/3/eric-holders-liberal-racism/

Mr. Holder is a race baiter. On Tuesday, he testified during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the voting rights case involving members of the New Black Panther Party. In the 2008 election, Black Panthers - dressed in military fatigues and wielding a club - threatened voters at a Philadelphia polling station. They denounced the voters as “crackers” and vowed those voters would not be allowed to help defeat then-candidate Barack Obama. Their goal was to bully and intimidate. This was a clear case of violation of voting rights. Such behavior may occur with impunity in banana republics - not in the world’s leading democracy.

Rep. John Culberson, Texas Republican, confronted the attorney general, demanding to know why the Justice Department refused to prosecute the Black Panthers - especially considering they were caught making the menacing gestures on tape. Mr. Holder shamelessly played the race card. He claimed to take offense at comments by civil rights activist Bartle Bull, who called it the most serious example of voter intimidation he had ever seen at the polls.

“When you compare whatpeople endured in the South in the ‘60s to try to get the right to vote for African-Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia … to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people,” Mr. Holder said.

Excuse me - his “people”? This is one of the most outrageous - and divisive - statements by a senior government official in recent memory. His people are and should be the American people - all of us.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/09/d...students-for-behaving-badly-texting-in-class/

The Department of Justice wants schools to directly consider race when disciplining students, taking care to ensure that some races are not punished more often than others, even if students of certain races misbehave more often.

Eric Holder’s DOJ co-wrote the letter with the Department of Education, and sent it to public schools across the country yesterday. First among its decrees: Schools should not strive to treat all races the same; rather, they should treat the races differently, levying weaker punishments when necessary, in order to effect equal outcomes among students of all races.

The problem? Not all races are equally likely to misbehave at school. Boys, for instance, get into trouble much more frequently than girls. And black, Hispanic and Native American children — who are far more likely to grow up in single-parent households — have higher misbehavior rates than white and Asian students, according to Roger Clegg of National Review.

 

Wait a second here... Why is it that every thread that might show something not PC gets moved here? Seems kind of fishy to me...

Either way, we may as well get used to the benefits of diversification... Well not a benefit to the victim, but hey, if they had insurance or something, there are benefits for someone, right???

 

I would bet that you have not read the letter. Just spewing your outrage based upon propaghanda and distortion in the right wing media.... I know the other post from the washington times.... that might as well be national inquirer with stories of big foot and aliens it is full of so many lies.

Regarding the letter, I started reading it. Here why don't you try: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201401-title-vi.pdf

What I see is a letter that says:

So the department of education working with the justice department to try to prevent discrimination is a problem for you....

 

Are you saying that what I posted is wrong? Prove that as you alibi for a racist.

So Holder does not want blacks punished and you with your white guilt agree. Be a good boy and cite the data Racist Holder used to determine that school were discriminating. Line up all the lawsuits from blacks that the schools treated them differently. Knee-jerk white guilt is a pitiful thing to watch.

 

It's very sad a person cannot go for a walk without the risk of being shot to death. However, as a pragmatist, if this where we are in our culture I do believe it should be Federally mandated to allow conceal carry in all 50 States.

I don't care about the color of the victim's skin or the perpetrator, a human being who is abiding by the laws should have the right to defend their life at any time and in any place against bad people who intend to do harm.

Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.

 

I think most whites realize that the majority of times they are attacked, they are attacked by someone white. So I guess using your argument, the white race is at a race war with themselves.

 

You are flat out wrong... No where does it say, indicate, or imply that holder does not want blacks punished. Show me where it says that. You are the one who is utterly full of it and are listening to the right wing propaganda that lies and distorts .

You say to prove what you are saying is wrong... OK. The letter says nothing that you are claiming. How else can you prove that your imagination is wrong. Prove that you are right.

There is no white guilt on my end. There is only the ability to read.

The only thing your right wing propaganda has found is the "disparate impact" section. This is saying that if a policy has a disparate impact on one race and is not needed, then it may be considered discriminatory. The letter has an example of if a zero tolerance policy for being late is enforced with suspensions, and there is an Asian community on the other side of town that takes public transportation that is late at times due to their location and transporttion, then this policy would adversely affect the Asian community and their learning due to strict punishment for minor lateness. And if there is no educational need for suspensions, then the policy, even if applied evenly, could be considered discriminatory to the Asians.

That's it. That is all it says. And it takes someone digging for an agenda of hate to extrapolate that this means that Holder does not want blacks punished. That is just lemmings letting right wing propaganda fan the flames of their conservative anger.