Inter-racial relationships= white genocide

Can you count up to one hundred with each number in a separate post? No? I am the winner.

 

You have no answer, no one does.

The popular syndicated columnist, Sydney Harris, recently commented on the evolution/entropy conflict as follows:​

​

​

There is a factor called "entropy" in physics, indicating that the whole universe of matter is running down, and ultimately will reduce itself to uniform chaos. This follows from the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which seems about as basic and unquestionable to modern scientific minds as any truth can be. At the same time that this is happening on the physical level of existence, something quite different seems to be happening on the biological level: structure and species are becoming more complex, more sophisticated, more organized, with higher degrees of performance and consciousness.1​

As Harris points out, the law of increasing entropy is a universal law of decreasing complexity, whereas evolution is supposed to be a universal law of increasing complexity. Creationists have been pointing out this serious contradiction for years, and it is encouraging that at least some evolutionists (such as Harris) are beginning to be aware of it.​

​

​

How can the forces of biological development and the forces of physical degeneration be operating at cross purposes? It would take, of course, a far greater mind than mine even to attempt to penetrate this riddle. I can only pose the question - because it seems to me the question most worth asking and working upon with all our intellectual and scientific resources.2​

This, indeed, is a good question, and one for which evolutionists so far have no answer. Some have tried to imagine exceptions to the Second Law at some time or times in the past, which allowed evolution to proceed in spite of entropy, but such ideas are nothing but wishful thinking.​

​

​

Being a generalization of experience, the second law could only be invalidated by an actual engine. In other words, the question,. "Can the second law of thermodynamics be circumvented?" is not well-worded and could be answered only if the model incorporated every feature of the real world. But an answer can readily be given to the question, "Has the second law of thermodynamics been circumvented?" Not yet.3​

 

If you take a close look around nowadays you will see many Black women wearing their hair in natural styles. But, for many years Black women and even some Black men (they used to conk their hair) thought straight White looking hair was more beautiful and tried to emulate it.

 

It's called being accurate. If you consider it nitpicking, then so be it.

 

Strand THE most virulent and venomous white supremacist male on a desert island for 20 years....

with this woman....





and see how quickly he gets over his fear of whites being "bred out of existance."

 

Also you could collaborate in genocidal demographic policies against the Chinese and then mock them with same spurious argument.

 

mike, do you deny the point and premise I made in Post #105?


do you deny it ...personally?

 

You don't have a relevant "point".

 

white people invaded North America, South America, Africa, Asia, Australia.

 

Jews invaded Europe America and Palestine. All Jews should be replaced with Africans

Turks invaded Constantinople. Turks should be replaced with Chinamen and Australoids..

 

French and Germans invaded Britain.

 

Less attractive to which males? The gay ones.

 

The only way you could prove that empirically is with survey data showing that males in general find Black females to be the least attractive of all the different ethnic groups. Even then are you saying that this is an innate tendency of male sexual desire to find Black female characteristics to be unattractive or is it cultural? If it is innate then what is your evolutionary explanation for this tendency? If it is cultural then perhaps it can be changed. As far as all attractive Black women being biracial is concerned African-Americans are on average about 20-30 percent European genetically so there is going to be a variety of different looks in the gene pool including a spectrum from very dark to very light skin and differences in facial characteristics and body types as well. A very small percentage of African-Americans are "biracial" (One Black parent and one non-Black parent). My experience is that there are a variety of different looks in the African-American and African descent community and I judge based on the individual. I don't have a preference. That goes for women of other ethnic groups as well.

I certainly find some individual women prettier than others but I don't think racial/ethnic aesthetics takes away or enhances beauty.

 

For what it's worth, I think the whole idea that certain populations of humanity are objectively more attractive than others is stupid.

I'm not gonna lie, as a white dude, I have a huge soft spot for dark-skinned African ladies. I think we all have our own individual preferences or fetishes, even if they aren't always "racial" or focused on the same physical characteristics. The thing is that these preferences and fetishes can go all over the place. That's why we have this little thing called Rule 34. If there are entire subcultures of guys out there drooling over big-eyed anime heroines, Warcraft night elves, or even anthropomorphic foxes, it wouldn't make sense that men of any race would be neurologically hard-wired to dislike African female features. After all, African people are still Homo sapiens.

It's true that, ever since the Middle Passage, attacking African women's beauty and desirability has been a traditional anti-black racist tactic (along with the nonsense about African people's intelligence, aggressiveness, and other characteristics meant to make them look bad). That trope always underlay all the paranoia about African men pursuing and raping European women, and it's legacy lives on in the ongoing problem of colorism. However, all that had nothing to do with hard-wired sexual preferences and everything to do with the larger sociopolitical agenda of subordinating African people.

 

NO!

Since the so called "white race" actually is a mixed ethnic system, so ... the "white race" is an interracial ethnic group [oh my, we are all subhumans!].

 

You can't deny it, can you?

As much of a white supremacist/separaatist as you are....if you were stuck on a deserted island with the woman I showed above....

you'd "get over" your racist views pretty fast, if she was open to a physical relationship.

 

The trouble with your stupid argument is that it's based on an imaginary reality.

 

No, what troubles you is....knowing that your penis would over-ride your hatred. And that makes you crazy.

 

I eally don't have any hatred. It's just that your argument is stupid. If there were no White civilizations and no White women maybe I would bang some cherry picked mulatto. But that's not reality is it?

 

20 years on a desert island....and you'll rely on your ...right hand?....when you could be with...




BTW, I deliberately picked women FROM Africa....so you couldn't play the "mulatto" card.


BTW, BTW, nothing in what you believe...much less "hope for"...is reality. Just ask D.C. Stephenson or George Lincoln Rockwell (well, they're both dead) or David Duke.

 

I've explained clearly why your point is stupid, so if you're just going to repeat yourself I guess you'll have to be put down as stuck on stupid.

 

If there were an after-life and God with a sense of irony....that's what you'd get. "Twilight Zone" style (like the episode where the thief dies and goes to "Heaven" and gets everything he wants...and goes nuts from boredom)....

in your case it would be waking up from your death-bed, and finding yourself young and vigorous again, in a beautiful, warm, tropical island paradise....plenty of food and water, gorgeous beaches, blue waters.....

and your ONLY companion....for ALL ETERNITY....is a lovely, young black woman.

And how FAST, you not only would avail yourself to her allowing you into her bed....but over time?

Falling in love with her....years pass....children are born even..and then?

After several years more, you're rescued by the "White People's Republic of America" air-and-sea forces....and you as a good, decent, pure Aryan are taken home to enjoy the "whites only" world.....and she and your children are left alone on the island, given they are non-white.

And then.....maybe your soul would learn and grow.


Or, there's just THIS world....and you'll just die a bitter, angry old man in a nursing home in a multi-cultural world, who has to bite his tongue for years, about his views of racial minorities in front of his black, Latino, Asian, and even white nurses and doctors.

and there will be no growth....just extinction. And a "good riddance" from those who knew you.

 

cool story bro

not

 

No, I'm an agnostic.....so I'm betting on the Second Scenario.

There will be no "White Revolution"...no "White Republic"....the United States, the world, will be multi-racial and multi-cultural with no "refuge for white people".

And you'll be angry and bitter and blame your life's failings on other groups....and whatever...30-40-50-60 years from now, you'll be hunkered down somewhere, perhaps still rattling off "facts and statistics about non-whites" via a keyboard-less connection to the Internet.

Linked with a few other racists across the world, all still dreaming of "the Revolution".....and complaining about blacks, Latinos, Asians, etc......as well as your incontinence and arthritis.

Until the lights slowly dim......on a wasted life.

 

So now your argument is that I will age and "I fail"? You're a real master of rhetoric. You are the winner and I take back everything I said as incorrect.