You can't argue with idiots. It wouldn't matter what Iran did or didn't do. They would still argue that negative evidence is positive evidence. As in : "The fact that we cannot find a shred of evidence that Iran is building a nuclear bomb means that they must be hiding their project from us."
maybe a 'taxi driver' told MI6 and CIA they have nuclear weapons we all know how reliable taxi drivers are http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/dec/08/45-minutes-wmd-taxi-driver
Indeed, it is irrelevant what Iran is doing or not doing. The multinationals want access to Iran's oil reserves, and the USA taxpayers and troops is going to pay the price to make it available to them, just like Iraq. I filled up all my 5 gallon gas cans today. Its time to get ready.
They we caugh red-handed removing stuff possibly left by a nuclear weapon trigger. That would not be my definition of "red handed".