Is Neo[Atheism] a Rational Religion?

Quote a single source.

And if every proposition requires a T/F response, then why do you call it a "red herring" when asked for a T/F response to propositions?

 

Im still waiting for your single source that validates your "I dont know" as a valid response to a true false question. I have been waiting for over 200 posts.

We all know that you wont cite it because you made it all up, logic teacher.

Your above post you contradict yourself again, so now you claim that true false are not the only valid answers to a true false question. strange logic you have friend.

Its a redd herring to the dispute over your "I dont know" claim. Are you a native english speaker? You seem to have intense difficulty with connectives.

 

I've provided my arguments. You haven't responded to any of them.

I've asked you over hundreds of posts across multiple threads for a single source that supports your claims. You've refused. Strange hang-ups (I can't call it logic) you have, friend.

But this is a familiar pattern: you make outrageous claims, demand I disprove them, refuse to provide ANY supporting evidence of your own, refuse to read any source I provide, refuse to reply to ANY argument I provide, hide behind junior high taunts instead of engaging in any kind of logic at all, etc. etc.

I'll ask you again: why can't you provide a SINGLE source that backs up your claims?

 

Of course I responded to and quashed them. For some strange reason (apparently your difficulty with connectives) you dont seem to understand that "I dont know" is not a legitimate response to a T/F question. Im sorry to pop your bubble. Besides you already provided my source when you cited stanford lol

 

I'm not talking about T/F testing methodology. I'm talking about bivalence in logic. Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?

 

You provided it for me. LOL
Yes you are when you respond with "I dont know" to a T/F propossition LOL
How many more times you gonna go around on that same faulty merry go round?

 

I wasn't talking about "T/F questions." That's the goal post you moved when you realized you were losing. I was talking about formal logic and bivalence. Propositions =/= questions. Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?

I'll ask again:

Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?

 

@yardmeat; you claim "I dont know" is a valid response to a T/F proposition,

I'll ask again:

Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?
Why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?

 

I understand your desperation to run away. And you always try to hide by not quoting or tagging me when you are on the ropes, trying to sneak in a "response" that you hope I won't catch. You've admitted many, many, many times that you don't know the answer to certain T/F propositions. Every ****ing human being in existence with two brain cells to rub together realized that a claim can be T/F without knowing which truth value holds. You've admitted this many, many, many times before. Why are you changing your mind now and why can't you provide a single source that backs up your claims?

 

I responded in accordance with the bogus professor yardmeatist logic rules to demonstrate the stupid course it would take us down.

and that was to swensson, yours I ignored LOL

well with the exception to demanding more information to the point of answering the your 'question' (that wasnt a proposition anyway) for me.

next red herring false-ism

 

Why can't you make up your mind? You have, for YEARS, insisted that there are T/F questions that you don't know the answer to. Why have you changed your mind? Which Koko are we talking to? Others and I have offered several T/F questions that you don't have an answer for.

You claim that anyone who faces a T/F question must immediately know an answer.
You've admitted to not knowing the answer to T/F questions.

Let me guess, you won't be able to address any of the above? Right? And this isn't even covering the fact that you can't tell the difference between bivalence and T/F testing methodology . . . that's too advanced of a concept to cover until you can be honest enough to address the bolded parts. You won't. We both know you won't.

 

you are confused again, no I have not admitted any such thing.
yeh since you cant respond to a question after you die of old age after all.
Dancing with you is really boring you know because you make so much **** up all the time.

 

@Kokomojojo , are there any T/F questions that you don't know the answer for?

Or, to get more meta:

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

 

Yes. You have. Many times. Unless you are no longer an agnostic . . . which wouldn't surprise me at this point. Why can't you answer the T/F question in post #4063?

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

 

I defer to yardmeat rules, "I need more information"
Give me more information and I will respond.
Gotta love yardmeat logic!

 

Koko rules say that doesn't work. You must immediately answer without any additional information. This is literally what you've demanded. If you need more information, then you are admitting defeat and admitting that your entire line of argument was a lie. So, was your entire line of argument a lie, or do you have a T/F answer to the question?

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

 

I defer to yardmeat rules, "I need more information"
Give me more information and I will respond.
Gotta love yardmeat logic!



Now I will get a gold star A+++ on a yardmeat logic test!

 

"Not enough information" is a frequent choice on tests for a reason, both in logic and geometry. But we both know you are refusing to answer because you know if you answer honestly that you'll destroy your entire line of argument. We don't have to keep beating a dead horse if you'll just be honest for a single post.

 

@Kokomojojo

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

If you don't answer immediately with T or F, then we know that your previous claims about T/F questions requiring an immediate answer, without any further inquiry, is false. You never even believed your own garbage.

 

a question is not a proposition, you contradict yourself again!
welcome to the merry go round desert of the yardmeat!
Can the rest of us move on from your ILL logic charade anytime soon?

 

You are the only one who has claimed that a question is a proposition. Seriously. Only you. And multiple people corrected you on your mistake.

I'm not the one contradicting myself every week.

Well, since you still can't respond . . .

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

 

Wow! Such desperation, making false claims, AGAIN!

AGAIN: Please read slowly: Questions are not propositions.

Youve been told this countless times, yet you repeat the same stupidity.

 

You literally tried to pose a question as proposition: "God exists?" You were called out on it. No one else has posed a question as a proposition except you.

You are the only one who claimed they are.

Countless times? You haven't answered the question even once, despite claiming that the question demands an immediate T/F answer without any additional information.

True or false? Koko knows the correct answer to every T/F question in existence.

You are the only one claiming this question demands an immediate T/F answer without any additional information. If you answer T, you are claiming omnipotence. If you answer F, you are admitting your entire argument is a lie. If you don't answer at all, you are admitting your entire argument is a lie. Which is it?

 

once AGAIN our self professed logic teacher professor dodge contradicts himself.

Why do you persist with this charade?

 

I've made no contradiction. I've only demonstrated yours. There's a reason you can't answer any question you are asked.