Is the scientific community stupid?

What you cant comprehend the article ? Deflection with emojis is understandable with sheep

 

Lead a horse to water....

 

Thank you for DISQUALIFYING yourself from any further meaningful interactions on this topic as far as I am concerned.

Have a nice day!

 

*shrugs*

Once again not my fault you don't want to learn

 

Thank you for establishing that the disqualification is justified.

 

Say what?

All you do is try to squash the opposition, your mind is made up and then when being challenged you go into all cap mode or use childish emojis ..

Its simple I cant explain the process anymore of scrubbing technology because you refuse to research the technology first.

 

All you have done is post a few meaningless images which anyone could google. You have not made any attempt to explain anything WRT to the actual technology itself and it is becoming patently obvious that you are out of your depth when it comes to the processes involved.

Have a nice day!

 

It's on my phone.. what you dont believe me now I took the damn picture?

 

And also because you refuse to research the technology you're self , why is that?

 

These threads are rarely all on the same page.

 

That is pretty much my point. We have a numbering system which is wonderfully adaptive. Just because we can get the results we are looking for with this wonderful system does not mean that the results are significant. GIGO.

 

Some of us understand the science well enough to spot the hyperbolic nonsense whether it’s from deniers or “science god worshippers”.

 

Historically, the 'scientific' community is stupid. Almost everyone who has devoted their life to the 'scientific' community was wrong about what they believed. I have no good reason to believe that it's any different today.

 

They are not stupid. However, some of them get so wrapped up in their own discipline that it puts blinders on them when it comes to critical thinking.

 

???

Science deniers and those who believe in "creation science" are the same people.

 

Who said anything about creation science? I’m talking about people who worship science as their god. Who are emotionally driven to believe anything if the label “science” is attached.

Do you know a lot about “creation science” as you call it? Most people who reference such things have very little understanding of them because they haven’t studied the subject or spent any time applying critical thought. Generally it’s just negative emotional reaction. Perhaps born out of subconscious fear that their dogmatic beliefs may have to be re-examined.

What is a science denier to you? I hear the term a lot, but it seems to be bandied about like the term “socialist”. Too subjective and nuanced without supplying some context or further definition.

 

Probably not. Seeing as how that's how new concepts are born.

Did I say experience had to be something you see with your own eyes, or did you just have experience of the fact being reported? The funny thing is, I can claim statements like yours don't matter. The source of the experience doesn't matter. So long as you have an experience, you have added to your knowledge.

 

So who created the big bang theory an atheist or a catholic priest?

Think and choose carefully

And don't use emojis because its embarrassing intellectually.

 

Experience is a personal and what one may know from that experience may be 100% true, 100% false, or something in between.
And your experience will certainly be different from my experience. Even if we experience it together. There by making it subjective.
Objective requires no experience. Just fact that can not be changed by anyone's experience.

 

Interesting so me using a flat head screw driver/ slipping and cutting my hand/ bleeding is subject to 100% fact or 100% false?

 

We both could be wrong because of our biases. Objective means, IMO, there is no other explanation.

1+1=2. There is no other way to state that. No matter one's experience. It can never be altered.
It is why I say, the only objectives that I know about are in math and physics.

 

But common core math that's being taught tells us

5+ 6 = 7×8÷9 × 7~20÷7-25 = 0

 

I thank you for proving my point. Why would anyone who is a scientist care about a social agenda? Social or real science.

But, IMO, social sciences is nothing more than psychology. It is a study of human conditions. And we aren't to the point we can understand scientifically the human mind and body with certainty.
When most talk about science, social isn't part of it. It's math, physics, chemistry,

 

Well, you should skip the home schooling. Or understand better what is being taught.
There is NO MATH class that is teaching your equation. That isn't BS.

But if you can prove some school or even that common core can prove that equation you put out then I will see how they come up with that.

1) 5+6=11
2) ~ means what, in common core math. Explain.
3) 11 is NOT equal to 0. So no real math, common core or other will teach the BS you typed.

 

Unfortunately I know about it and it's so ridiculous I had to talk to this teacher about it while holding my baby daughter in my arms, my step daughter was having issues with it so I went to her school to talk .


Her teacher was real nice, and she explained to me that was what the circlium was about..

Logical thinking.


They wanted kids to get involved and think logical about a solution.

No wrong answer, no right answer