I read your link, thanks. You simply have not demonstrated the validity of that platform as being currently relevant to what homosexual political groups are now espousing or that there is some overarching, consolidated 'agenda' that applies to 'the gays'. Nor have you shown who these activists are.
I didn't see the need for including the whole post, but the entire argument is based on a false premise (or two!) - that gay people somehow find it really, really hard to meet other gay people. They don't. This is the modern world, with the internet and everything! It would probably be a little easier in some places if gay men could be open about being gay, of course, but the reality in most of the civilised world is that there are plenty of places where gay men can meet each other. The other issue, of course, is the idea that all gay men are incredibly well 'groomed', and that straight people aren't. That's nothing more than a stereotypical image of gay men, combined with an assumption about 'well groomed', 'metro-sexual' men, neither of which have any basis in fact. Super-groomed men is a completely separate modern trend that some choose to subscribe to - it actually has nothing whatsoever to do with sexuality, despite the accusations of those who don't subscribe to that particular trend and who view it is some kind of 'becoming less manly' thing. Obviously if everyone just saw everyone else as equally worthy individuals, free to get on with their lives how ever they see fit according to their own nature and/or decisions in life (be they gay or straight, groomed or not groomed, or whatever else they are or choose to be), then there would be no need for any kind of 'movement' or 'agenda'. Sadly that is not yet the case.
Those documents and others outline the objective, other documents such as the book "After The Ball" outline in detail the means to achieve the objectives. When you look at the events related to the gay "equality" movement since the 1970's and particularly since the late 1980's, the events have played out as the book outlined (but it took 25 years instead of the 10 the book predicted). Opponents of the gay agenda have been vilified, harassed, and made out to be the "bad guy". Gay friendly characters permeate television shows and movies, and are represented in media far above their actual presence and role in real life. The federal and state governments fund pro-gay promotional organizations, and mandate pro-gay education in public schools. Religion has come under attack. All out of the articles and book from the late 1980's and early 1990's. A plan was proposed, events show it was successfully implemented almost exactly as outlined. Because it took 25 years does not invalidate it - 25 years is well within the time frame of a persons "career".
Yes, 'Gay Rights' advocates are certainly bigots. This is the updated agenda published in The Guide in 1987, and describes perfectly responses like yours to a T. It is also the same one followed by MSM editors at rags like the New York Times and almost all others. http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm Your post is 'talking point' number 5: The sleazy propaganda never varies one iota from the published agenda, including your ad homs. I have yet to see a post by the shills that doesn't follow along exactly the agenda laid out.
People should be strong armed into a world where there is freedom. Just use that freedom to not be the person you don't want to be.
