That's one Commie-Socialist out of the closet!! Come on, there are more here on the Forum...Identify yourselves.
If believing everyone should be educated to a decent standard makes me a commie-socialist ( what the hell is that), then it's a good thing to be. For a start, you'd properly understand the meanings of communism and socialism.
Sweetie pie, if a man is to be held responsible for his children ( which is the only way it can be ) he should also an equal say in all decisions. It`s just an equality thing honey buns. best to you & yours, spunk bubble
But...Teaching little girls a boys how to have sex is not a 'decent standard' and yes, the fact that you want to send folks to re-education in order to make them bow to the pro-abort way of thinking smacks of commie-socialist-fascist garbage.
Ad Hom And do you think kids who grow up on farms do NOT know about sex? You can ask any midwife - the pregnant 11 year old was the one supremely ignorant of sex
A child can be taught what sex is and how to handle their feelings without sexualizing them by giving them the means to do it thereby actually condoning it in the child's mind. Kids that grow up on farms see animals having sex and learn what the process is. Are you denigrating farm kids?
No, but I believe you might be by insisting that education = sexualisation Something you have yet to prove
How to is different from what we are proposing which is "about" sex It is interesting that the SAME poster who repeatedly posts explicit posts on sex, instead of just posting about intercourse like the rest of us do, is the one insisting, without any proof that sex education will be teaching "little girls and boys about sex" Obviously he is not aware that THIS site is not a blocked site and his posts could be read by anyone
kids that grow up on farms learn the difference between them and animals. other kids are taught they ARE animals..
I I don;t know - certain males who keep logging onto abortion threads for the sole purpose of telling women what sluts they are seem to indicate that some people never learn to act in a civilised (non-animal) way
Are you implying there is something wrong with teenagers having sex, as long as its safe sex (with protection)? Because there is not. Here we have it in plain sight folks - anti-choice is NOT about saving "babies". Its about punishing women and girls who dare to have sex outside marriage. FYI, teenagers are not "children".
That is exactly it - and so many lifers assume that married women don't have abortions. How mistaken they are.
Yes...You are wrong. Women and girls punish themselves, not men. If one is a parent, it doesn't matter what age their offspring is, they are still their CHILDREN. A 16-year old teenager is a MINOR child whose parents are 100% responsible for them. How old are you anyway?
A woman can have an abortion whether or not she is married. SCOTUS ruled this. In fact, her husband has 0 say over his offspring according to that decision. This means that women are 100% responsible for sexual reproduction. One would think some of them would stop blaming men for their reproductive problems.
no, they would rather play the victim forever. They cut men out of the decision making and then whine that men aren't supportive. They want their cake and to eat it too. They want men to have sex with, to pay for their children, to support them...except when they don't want them to have sex with, and not to make decisions about the children, etc.. honestly, most feminazis seem to have severe mental problems.
I actually think that feminazis just hate men and barely tolerate truly feminine women who actually love and respect their men.
Actually it goes deeper than that. If she is unconscious the man DOES have a say - just as he would for any other medical procedure But no medical procedure is reliant on another persons permission unless the patient is either intellectually disabled or a child As for men taking no responsibility - that is not how it is seen under the law, at least here. IF a woman says NO at any point during intercourse and the man does not stop then it is deemed rape under the act. So if a woman says "I want you to do the responsible thing and withdraw" and you do not you might very well find yourself charged with rape
I am sorry but can you name me one medical procedure that requires you to have consent of a second party?
Which proves my point that women are 100% in control of the reproductive process. Men have absolutely nothing to do with it even if he gains consent to her vagina. The problem with that is there is (naturally) no objective party, only the woman's word. She could have said 'Yes' but then said 'No' AFTER he ejaculated. Yes, women DO lie. This is a problem created by pathetic, socialist societies that have no morals are values and denigrate commitment and marriage. This is why I counsel men to make and get a commitment BEFORE plunging his penis into her vagina because it gives him better (but not perfect) protection. Every man should realize that whenever he has procreational sex he is exposing himself to significant legal liability. It's best to have a contract first. (marriage contract) This is also why denigrating the traditional definition of marriage is deleterious to society.
That was a bit garbled, but you seem to think a marriage certificate will absolve fathers from the responsibility they have towards their children. It doesn't.
I does just the opposite and your reply goes to the problem some women seem to have understanding what a commitment means.
