"Jesus was a Black man who was oppressed by White men"

Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by Anders Hoveland, Jun 11, 2012.

  1. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course you are. What else would you do?

    I've already been warned by the mods against accusing others of racism, so I won't do this here. Get that [MENTION=585]superbadbrutha[/MENTION]? Galatians 6:7.

    Sorry, Mike, but if you think Negroes invented music,I suggest you get a refund on your HS diploma since you obviously don't know anything about human history.
     
  2. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No of course I don't think Negroes invented music, especially since Negroes evolved 5000 years ago. Are you resorting to lame strawmen?

    BTW I'm totally racist.
     
  3. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obviously.

    According to what book that you are reading?
     
  4. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that's enough subject changes for one day.
     
  5. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are free to dodge all you like. Girls play hard to get, but to me, that often means they are unsure of what they have. A strong girl simply says no and will explain why.
     
  6. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not dodging. I just can't be bothered answering your questions any more. Pretend otherwise if it makes you feel better. Open a new thread on your new question and I might answer it.
     
  7. Egalitarianjay02

    Egalitarianjay02 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,289
    Likes Received:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    I would also like to know how you came up with this rather bizarre claim. What is your source?
     
  8. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL. Okey Dokey.
     
  9. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what source data are you using to derive the term caucusasian?
     
  11. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The pseudo science of phrenology.........
     
  12. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lol. Phrenology is the belief that the brain has highly localised functions. Studying skulls is physical anthropology.
     
  13. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you mean phenology..?
     
  14. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can repeat the question as many times as you want but won't get an answer unless you concede that the logical framework that that data would fit into is sound, since it would be pointless. The framework is primary, the data secondary.
     
  15. J0NAH

    J0NAH Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,047
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what is the logical framework?
     
  16. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=251603&page=12&p=1064416296#post1064416296
     
  17. Margot2

    Margot2 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2013
    Messages:
    73,644
    Likes Received:
    13,766
    Trophy Points:
    113
    phre·nol·o·gy


    /freˈnäləjē/


    noun
    historical

    noun: phrenology




    the detailed study of the shape and size of the cranium as a supposed indication of character and mental abilities.
     
  18. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Race is based on genetic similarity and shared ancestry and makes no claims in itself about mental abilities although it may be used to describe variation in mental abilities determined independently.
     
  19. Casper

    Casper Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    Messages:
    12,540
    Likes Received:
    72
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So What.
     
  20. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,458
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there is no word "Caucusasian".

    you made it up.
     
  21. Egalitarianjay02

    Egalitarianjay02 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,289
    Likes Received:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    I have no problem with answering your question....

    Here's the data for discordant variation.


    Care to answer my question now?
     
  22. mikemikev

    mikemikev Banned

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3,796
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That isn't data that's the result of data. What traits is it based on?

    If you look at a couple of cherry picked superficial phenotypic traits like skin color and hair texture obviously Australoids would cluster with Negroids. If you look at the genome or skull traits they don't.

    This is kind of like saying "dolphins are fish" based on superficial resemblance then pretending we can't establish the real relationship based on deeper analyses ie. it's politically motivated "anti-race" bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
     

Share This Page