Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

JIM JORDAN FIRED UP: During President Trump Impeachment Hearing

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MolonLabe2009, Nov 13, 2019.

Page 1 of 14
  1. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And this is the Democrats star witness? LMFAO!

    What an embarrassment and a disaster for the Democrats this is turning out to be.

    If the next couple of days goes as bad as today, I think Schiff-for-brains will just pull the plug on this whole impeachment inquisition and end it prematurely and go in hiding.

     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2019
    MolonLabe2009, Nov 13, 2019
    #1
    Seth Bullock, Ddyad, Tim15856 and 10 others like this.
  2. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I keep waiting for Schiff's eyeballs to pop out and land on the desk.
     
    vman12, Nov 13, 2019
    #2
    Seth Bullock, Ddyad, Tim15856 and 6 others like this.
  3. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Judicial Watch comments here...
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #3
    Ddyad, Tim15856, Professor Peabody and 8 others like this.
  4. scarlet witch

    scarlet witch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    Messages:
    11,951
    Likes Received:
    7,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Yes he is entertaining to watch.. Jim Jordan

    [​IMG]
     
    scarlet witch, Nov 13, 2019
    #4
    Ddyad, Professor Peabody, TBLee and 4 others like this.
  5. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How the ambassador got his "clear understanding"
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #5
    Ddyad, Professor Peabody, 2ndclass289 and 6 others like this.
  6. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Parscale...
    [​IMG]
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #6
    Ddyad, Tim15856, Professor Peabody and 12 others like this.
  7. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nor is it a valid reason for a "whistleblower" complaint.
     
    vman12, Nov 13, 2019
    #7
    Ddyad, Tim15856, Professor Peabody and 6 others like this.
  8. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BINGO!
     
    MolonLabe2009, Nov 13, 2019
    #8
    Ddyad, Professor Peabody, 2ndclass289 and 6 others like this.
  9. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    IMO he and Radcliff should be given ALL the minority time!
     
    Just_a_Citizen, Nov 13, 2019
    #9
    Ddyad, 2ndclass289, TBLee and 3 others like this.
  10. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The ambassador was not the star whitness. He was asked to testify he told the truth. He did what he has always done , his job and service to our nation.
     
    PARTIZAN1, Nov 13, 2019
    #10
    FoxHastings, Saganist, Woolley and 4 others like this.
  11. Just_a_Citizen

    Just_a_Citizen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    4,133
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You lead with your best.

    These guys are a step up from "Where am I, and Why am I here Mueller"
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2019
    Just_a_Citizen, Nov 13, 2019
    #11
    Ddyad, Tim15856, 2ndclass289 and 2 others like this.
  12. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hearing Highlights – Jordan, Stefanik and Ratcliffe Deconstruct Impeachment Narrative…

    Day One of the Pelosi, Schiff and Lawfare effort to publicly construct support for the impeachment of President Trump ends. Within the questioning of State Department officials George Kent and Bill Taylor the value of adding Jim Jordan to the hearings became clear.

    Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik and John Ratcliffe methodically deconstructed the false premise advanced by the impeachment crew. It became clear that both Kent and Taylor held no specific and direct knowledge of the substance behind the claims made by the democrats leading the effort. Here’s a few highlights starting with Jim Jordan:

    https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-ratcliffe-deconstruct-impeachment-narrative/
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #12
    Ddyad, Tim15856, Professor Peabody and 2 others like this.
  13. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Seriously this is like Mueller 2.0

    They never learn.
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #13
    Ddyad, Professor Peabody, 2ndclass289 and 2 others like this.
  14. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wouldn't Jordan like to be interrogated on Candid Camera to get to the truth about how he helped cover up for a pedophile wrestling coach.

    Hey Jordan-- "" When least expected you're elected you're the Star today. Smile you're on Candid Camera ""
     
    PARTIZAN1, Nov 13, 2019
    #14
  15. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,302
    Likes Received:
    9,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, and this Jordon guy was gonna be the Hero for the Minority. He was laughable. Long rambling statements delivered in rapid-fire fashion followed by a tag line question unrelated to the original ramblings. He needs to remember that his statements/comments never become "evidence"....only the answer does. He is attempting to lampoon/ridicule and that is dangerous country with a resolute honest witness. The 'show' is NOT about the questioner (although Jordon was obviously playing up directly to his audience,) it is about what the witness says under oath that matters.
     
    Bush Lawyer, Nov 13, 2019
    #15
    FoxHastings, Woolley and Derideo_Te like this.
  16. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wouldn't [insert Democrat name here] like to be interrogated on candid camera to get to the truth about [insert scandal here].
     
    MolonLabe2009, Nov 13, 2019
    #16
    2ndclass289 and US Conservative like this.
  17. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Smearing the messenger is not an effective strategy.
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #17
  18. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are projecting-he was citing the long rambling statements received in testimony.

    Here it is summarized nicely.

     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #18
  19. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Taylor was the messenger that Jordan was smearing. Hey look it up Jordan was inboxed with a college coach's coverup of student molestation.
     
    PARTIZAN1, Nov 13, 2019
    #19
    FoxHastings likes this.
  20. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Hey people such as Jordan who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
     
    PARTIZAN1, Nov 13, 2019
    #20
  21. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,302
    Likes Received:
    9,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    'Projecting.' That makes no sense. I am making statements of fact. Do you agree that all he largely did was make a long rapid-fire speech with multiple facets, and then ask a question unrelated to what went on before he asked the question.

    As in ~ "Mary had a little lamb its fleece was white as snow, little Jack Horner sat down in a corner Jack and Jill went up a hill, Humpty Dumpty sat on a Wall, Jingle Bells jingle bells, Silent Night, holy night.......are you Ambassador Taylor?"
     
    Bush Lawyer, Nov 13, 2019
    #21
    FoxHastings, Derideo_Te and jack4freedom like this.
  22. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Pointing out that his testimony is based on hearsay and NYT's articles, in a supposed hearing is absolutely appropriate.

    The democrats shampeachment will backfire on them quickly.
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #22
  23. US Conservative

    US Conservative Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    66,099
    Likes Received:
    68,212
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He was repeating much of the convoluted testimony that had been obtained.

    He had limited time to speak and wanted to cover as much as possible.
     
    US Conservative, Nov 13, 2019
    #23
  24. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,302
    Likes Received:
    9,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes.....he was repeating what we already know. He was not there, as in...his intent, to ask questions at all. His predominant interest was to make statements....at that is NOT evidence. He can get on FOX and do all that. It is irrelevant.
     
    Bush Lawyer, Nov 13, 2019
    #24
    FoxHastings, Woolley, Derideo_Te and 1 other person like this.
  25. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,848
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He was not pointing anything out. He , Jordan was repeating a Constipated conspiracy theory like parrot on steroids.
     
    PARTIZAN1, Nov 13, 2019
    #25
    FoxHastings, Derideo_Te and jack4freedom like this.
Page 1 of 14

Share This Page