Trump clearly said "...and they let you". You guys say even that is disqualifying so why the double standard starting with Bill Clinton?
The puritanism of the hypocritical Left is laughable. “TACTILE POLITICS:” The New York Times Has a New Way of Describing Inappropriate Touching, Reserved Exclusively for Democrats. “Kudos to the NY Times Department of Euphemisms for ‘tactile politics,’” Iowahawk deadpans.
There is no mention of quality of the allegations in your whole post. Your post is nothing more than a hodge podge of rationalizations. Biden is talking about running for president. Does that mean the aqllegations mean more or are more valid? Not at all. The position has nothing to do with the veracity of the allegation. The argument that a person in moving into one position deserves to suffer abusive allegations more than another position is stupid. Also the amount of the allegations doesn't seem to have much to contribute to the validity of the allegations. Lisa Bloom and Allred were making a bundle representing and managing a bunch of the accusers to the press for a fee. One accuser wanted her mortgage paid off to appear on TV. "A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews. California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill." https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...wyer-sought-donor-cash-for-two-trump-accusers Jessica Leeds doesn't have any evidence to validate her claim. Gilberthorpe, 54, said he was sitting across the first class aisle from the couple and saw nothing inappropriate. Leeds was wearing a white pantsuit, he said, while Trump was wearing a suit and cuff-links, which he gave to his British flight companion. Indeed, Gilberthorpe claimed, Leeds was “trying too hard” in her attempt to win Trump over. “She wanted to marry him,” Gilberthorpe said of Leeds, who apparently made the confession when Trump excused himself and went to the bathroom. There was no kissing, but the “shrill” Leeds was “very much in your face” with the real estate developer. https://nypost.com/2016/10/14/trump-camp-puts-forward-witness-to-refute-sex-assault-claim/
Biden has too long a history and he is not a Progressive by a long shot so I agree that the party should get back to its roots and they were in fact Progressive roots prior to the party becoming Republican-lite. The party should represent and stand by getting corporate money put of politics...period! If it is not a grass roots funded campaign that the hopeful is running they should not be running at all.
This thread, like almost every thread here is about trashing a possible opponent in the next election. There are tons of guys Biden’s age who have been physically demonstrative throughout their lives like Biden. I do not believe that Biden is a sexual predator but in this day and age he would be a bad candidate for office as his political opponents will beat this dead horse into the ground and detract from the important issues facing this nation. Conversely, if Trump runs you can bet that the fact that Trump is a whore chasing lying sackoshit will be an issue that his opponents will beat the hell out of. I would suggest both parties do their vetting this time and choose candidates who are qualified and not such sleazebags. Also, Trump and Biden are both too old for this job which requires great vitality and stamina. We need better candidates.
Then why isn't the total of the left apoplectic about him running for president and denouncing him as they did Kavanaugh and his SCOTUS position? Sexual assault is sexual assault. Is it your claim that none of the women that have come forward in Biden's situation weren't offended or felt assaulted or harassed?
Whenever I find this legendary “total left”, I will ask them why they don’t all pile on Biden like a prison gang as they should. Thanks for your concern.
They are big on that! AND THEN THERE WERE SEVEN: Three More Women Come Complaining About Creepy Encounters With Joe Biden. Biden is “caught in a trap of his own making. He has worked really hard to make it tougher for college men to defend themselves from accusations of sexual harassment. He has worked really hard to make everybody assume men are always guilty as charged. He has worked really hard to change our assumptions about the burden of proof so that an accusation of wrongdoing requires no further evidence. Seemed like a good idea at the time, I guess?
Oh my your hair smells so nice it makes me want to kiss it. there were women lined up outside of the Anita Hill hearing ready to testify and Joe didn't let them testify. Joe himself has admitted he mishandled that situation I lost all respect for Joe at that moment when I learned that during the kavanaugh saga In Joe' defense he doesn't grab them by the puss@ I wonder how many women are proud that Donald Trump actually grabbed their vagina?
Do you seriously believe Joe has never grabbed a woman by the *****? With their consent of course, just like with DT.
We have video evidence of his strange behavior yet instead of dealing with it you wanna whataboutism.
If someone could just off the top of their head remember that creepy moment, find that creepy tape, so many all of the sudden remember these things, all of a sudden lots of them, please get them to find that C-Span tape around the time of the credit crunch and where the FED testified that banks rely upon irresponsible credit card debt to subsidize small business. I need it to go with the following: End of slavery: “The Federal Reserve's rule told credit card companies that they no longer can consider household income when assessing the creditworthiness of an individual who applies for his or her own card. Under the rule, only an individual's own salary or other income -- rather than combined household income -- can be considered.” Read more: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-c...cards-household-income-1282.php#ixzz3WiwAm9JK Slavery reinstituted: “U.S. Reps. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, and Louise Slaughter, D-NY, both among the principal authors of the CARD Act, said the rule ‘goes beyond the intent’ of the law and ‘represents a serious risk for women in abusive domestic partnerships.’" Read more: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-c...cards-household-income-1282.php#ixzz3Wivmh5r8
If your a credit card lender why would you base it on household income when giving a card? Given that marriage isn’t a sure thing anymore basing it off an individual seems like the smart thing for cc lenders imo
The world according to members of Crooked Donnie's cult.............. Violation of personal space is very bad. Sexual assault is not important.