Discussion in 'Current Events' started by MolonLabe2009, Nov 30, 2019.
Yup, the frontrunner. No wonder Bloomberg entered the race.
No, you're assuming facts not in evidence and telling you so is - tiring.
I've shown you examples where famous people CAN get away with anything when it comes to women. I've shown you that what Trump says is correct.
Your argument (such as it is) that the woman didn't SAY anything when a) there's plenty of ways to show disapproval of an action without talking such as walking away or slapping the man - or b) @Thedimon and his post - people have been on dates where not a word is spoken between them and plenty of consensual stuff occurs - is weaksauce.
Your posts indicate that you don't understand what "consent", much less the phrase "they let you" means. There's no way to converse with you when simple definitions elude you. Good day.
Go ahead and reply. I won't read it, but feel free. Now go to, go to.
I think that was a failed attempt at humor.
Maybe we should bring up the rapist Bill Clinton now and JFK's hookers in the WH.
Nah, I think he genuinely loves his wife but as usual - he shows his affection in inappropriate ways (his preferences for sniffing young girls etc.) or doing it at inappropriate times.
I deal with PDA quite a bit at school and had one of our kids done that out in the open we'd probably have a short talk with the kids involved. Then again, we deal with pubertoids, so - *shrugs*
If his daughter weren't his daughter he would date her.
Where is your CREDIBLE evidence?
Anybody can be "presuhdint". Just look at the blundering half-wit we're saddled with now.
Trump admitted to doing so. On tape. That is evidence.
Here we go again. Well-documented events about Bonespurs must be "proven" every time someone brings them up. But mere accusations are enough when it's "whataboutHillarry time."
Just wait--one of them will call it "hearsay" even when it's straight from Bonespurs' mouth
You’re complying that accusations must be proven?? Wow, what a good little leftie you must be.
Can I accuse you of whatever the hell I want, evidence be damned? I’m sure you wouldn’t mind right?
Where’s the victim? Aside from your hurt feelings.
The victim here is clearly you.
You're going to treat me like Hillary?
Hokay--fire away, Rush.
You're trying to help him, though.
No we are implying that we are sick and tired of the constant demands for proof of things well documented and discussed
Every woman that he did that to
Something like 20 plus accusers
Trump did with them what he has always done - threatened to sue and if they ignored that threatened to tie them up in legal argument until he bankrupts them but there is one standing up to this
Um With a name like Hand Solo I don't think that sort of claim is something I would go with
He isn't "toast"
The guy has a little bit of fun with his own wife, and the RW Freaks Out like it was another 9/11.
Well if you were rich, handsome and horney you would understand WHY almost every rich, handsome and horny men get accused with sexual harassment.. In fact most pro athletes are accused of all the same things Trump is accused of, odd huh ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
While at the same time giving a pass to “spanky” with his multiple affairs and “grab em by the.......”
Who is WE, all your Australian neighbors? If that's the case, get used to being sick because Australia doesn't count in U.S. politics and we certainly aren't obligated to extend any extra effort to satisfy anyone from a foreign country ¯\_(º¸º)_/¯
This is the most amazing thread in the history of this board. We have a thread claiming Joe Biden is “creepy” because he playfully bit the finger of his wife when she accidentally threw her hand in front of his face during a speech. That is now turned into the right wing somehow defending Trump when he claimed to grab a woman by the “*****”, claiming “they let you” somehow makes it OK. It’s just STUNNING. So Biden is “creepy” for playfully biting the finger of the woman he loves, and who loves him back......but Trump is somehow not only “ok” because he grabs woman in a sexual manner without permission? Your spinning yarns to defend him because the woman don’t say “no” ?
What kind of man thinks its OK to do that in the first place !!!!! For the sake of argument, I am not debating the “they let you” part. Thats a BS rabbit hole used but the right to justify the actions of Trump. But what I will debate until the cows come home is that the moral bankruptcy of a man who thinks that he has any right/reason/justification to do that in the first place. While the right is trying to place the blame on the women for “letting them” do it, somehow inferring that it is somehow permissive since she didn’t say “no” after the fact.
Your defending an act that has no defense. Your so focused on the woman not saying “no”, or justifying it based on the who and not the what, that your missing that no matter where you are, who you are with, your financial position, your power position, NOTHING justifies grabbing another person, Male or Female, in a sexual manner without permission. NEVER
But then again, the right refuses to accept that Trump has somewhere in the high 20’s, the number of credible sexual assault allegations.....
Separate names with a comma.