https://twitter.com/_CryMiaRiver/status/1668235608190320641?s=20 Saw this on Twitter and thought, as did many of the replies, this is absurd. They are literally taking definitions that relate to women and removing woman entirely. There are no women anymore. There are just non-men. Her tweet was questioned so she sourced it. https://studentaffairs.jhu.edu/lgbtq/education/glossary/ It's a sexual orientation where you remove biological sex. Makes total sense. Are the LG and B's realizing they've been lined up on the wall as useful idiots for the T's and MAPS yet? Where my ladies.... I mean my non-men at? You go non-boy! Make sure you are treated well. Make sure they know you are a non-king and act accordingly! Seems like each change is more non-inclusive and less tolerant of course in the name of both. What do you men and non-men think about this?
Just more of the insanity that is the fruit of the lefts agenda. You know we are in clown world when a supreme Court Justice refuses to simply say what a woman is LGBTQEBT... We're going to need some more letters
the definitions are definitely a problem, nothing wrong with being trans, but the term needs to be trans-man and trans-woman, there is a difference and people need to know what they are talking about I believe a female soul can inhabit a male body, but the body is still a male body - the vessel does not change any more than a car becomes a truck if a truck driver drives it
Well, that was the acceptable public issue. I see no evidence that there was less homosexuality, etc., at that time. We just forced them to spend huge efforts to hide their sexuality. I know a couple individuals who had fathers who were homosexual, married to their mothers. Their home life was total hell. But, it was a way for homosexuals to survive at a time when the truth would be serious exclusion from employment and other important relationships that humans need. In one case, the mother, a loving and wonderful individual, committed suicide. It's long past time that this devastating ostracism be put behind us.
totally agree, but now we have to determine who to call "they" vs "he" or "she", it's confusing to us old timers we should all support equal rights, for all, just saying that is confusing
Yes, us old folk do have to suck up a lot of change that is more significant than Ms v Mrs, which just isn't hard. Plus, I think there is less respect for grammar today - which means those of us growing up back when education included grammar may have a slightly higher barrier.
the hard part is figuring out when to use it, especially the word 'they', they need to give us old timers a break if we get it wrong... that said, intentionally saying it wrong to harass someone is not the same as mistakenly calling someone by the wrong pronoun Mrs vs Miss vs Ms was pretty significant when I was younger, I remember people getting very upset over that one if you got it wrong
