Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’

They can kill a patient. The most severe complication is death, and they are reported.

 

Heard the Dad tonight.

He says mom would only show him love from 3 years old if he wore girls clothes.

He's now 7, and she makes him stay in his room unless he's dressed like a girl-and he hates it.

 

The risks and harms associated with these blockers make this not worth doing. Not even kind of close. If, like Bruce/Caitlin Jenner, the kid wants to transition when 70 rather than 7, then do so. This is just child abuse.

More below:

Certainly, in this case my link is fine. The website did not materially differ than another link that was supposed to be more neutral offered by ARDY previously in this thread. ARDY’s was more detailed. It explained better what happened. What happened is the mom had a lot of “experts” testify in her support. I would warn people to listen to “experts”, especially in a soft science like Psychology, with a huge grain of salt. There is a reasonable argument that Psychologists should not be allowed to give expert testimony in court. That Jury turned their brains, and souls, off. Then they took, uncritically, the testimony of people advising them of the ludicrous. That this isn’t child abuse but a good idea. Despicable. That poor dad. That poor kid who may be sterilized and even killed for the fantasies of an abusive loon of a mother. I wish there was some way to help them.

 

Phew.

I don't buy a toaster oven without 2 yes votes. One from me the other from the missus. If it is a major choice impacting the family, both get a say. Before this ruling, the mother was to have sole decision making power on whether or not to possibly sterilize and even kill an innocent little 7 year old boy. Maybe there is hope in this nation after all.



https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...int-custody-in-case-of-transgender-7-year-old