Kerry word game of "Boots on the Ground"

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by justoneman, Sep 3, 2013.

  1. justoneman

    justoneman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very careful word salads are being tossed by the Obama admin. Kerry is going around saying there will be no boots on the ground with respect to the civil war in Syria. What this means is they are planning on boots on the ground and playing gamesw with what those boots on the ground are doing in Syria.

    Mark my words. There are plans for boots on the ground. Its more word games like when Obama said he was going to pull the troops out of Afghanistan.
     
  2. Stuart Wolfe

    Stuart Wolfe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    14,967
    Likes Received:
    11,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No boots on the ground. Drones in the air sure, but no boots on the ground. Trust us!
     
  3. justoneman

    justoneman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Read or watch what he says. He says it over and over. "No boots on the ground involved in Syria's civil war." He says this over and over exactly because they intend on boots on the ground. Guaranteed. If they really mean no boots on the ground they would simply say no boots on the ground, period. I am sick and tired of these word games so that six months from now when there are US soldiers in Syria and they go back to the quote and Kerry will say those troops are not directly involved in the civil war.
     
  4. Stuart Wolfe

    Stuart Wolfe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    14,967
    Likes Received:
    11,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He's also giving MSNBC and the rest of the Legacy Media their talking points for the week. If I watched Chris Matthews, I bet he'll be repeating that phrase more often than Kerry did.
     
  5. justoneman

    justoneman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "....with respect to a civil war."
     
  6. Mandrake

    Mandrake New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Likes Received:
    50
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Boots on the ground would be pointless since they would be targeted by both side and there is nothing to accomplish with it. Missiles and drones, no boots.
     
  7. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,188
    Likes Received:
    20,959
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The very fact that they would be targeted by both sides, is precisely why the Empire shouldn't get involved. This is a terrific time for Islamic Extremism to be exterminated by its own hand. I would fund both sides, agitate them and hope that they both crash and burn.

    We can negotiate with the Russians on the Vacuum left behind, so to assure Russia the safety of its bases in the Baltic.
     
  8. justoneman

    justoneman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First off there were boots on the ground in Libya when they said there were no boots on the ground. Those soldiers were targets. Second off they are playing word games for the very fact that they are planning on boots on the ground. You may believe that there will be no boots on the ground but the administration will be putting boots on the ground. It is being spelled out. The boots may actually already be on the ground there picking targets and doing recon. These boots on the ground are indeed targets already if they are already there.
     
  9. Mayerling

    Mayerling Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,452
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Boots both ours and Israeli have been on the ground since April. I will try to find that link
     
  10. Stuart Wolfe

    Stuart Wolfe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2012
    Messages:
    14,967
    Likes Received:
    11,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If Obama really wanted to wipe out Syrupia, he'd send Michelle over to order everyone how to eat. Within a few weeks every Syrian will have starved to death, a stray drone takes out Michelle by accident, two days later Barry is off dating Rihanna, and all's well with the world.
     
  11. justoneman

    justoneman New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Frankly I am tired of these well chosen words designed to suggest one thing but be used later to enforce something very different. This was done with regards to the massive expansion of the war in Afghanistan. The vast majority of Americans were not in favor of expanding that war at all. Obama sold that expansion simply by saying the troops would not be staying there forever. That after a year the troops would be removed...beginning in (well when ever that was so many years ago.. So long I forgot the actual date). Here it is several years later and the troops are double in Afghanistan of what was there when Obama took office. If you are not complaining about the troops not being pulled out of Afghanistan then he knows he can play word games again with Syria.
     
  12. Abu Sina

    Abu Sina New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    13,370
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Kerry and the US already has their 'boots on the ground'

    they are called Al Qaeda and ISIS and Al Nusra
     
  13. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Obama just means he's going to send the invading soldiers into Syria to fight with only socks on their feet.
     

Share This Page