Law professors file misconduct complaint against Kellyanne Conway

Neither did I.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

Well good for you. Let's see how this plays out then. It can be no worse than Clinton or the village idiot Johnson (who by the way gave libertarians NO shot to win anything any time soon)

 

None of which regards the very real possibility that Conway will be subjected to sanctions by the DC Bar Association for habitual untruthfulness and unethical behavior.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

Do you really think she cares, since she hasn't practiced law since, I dunno..............since 1990 something?

 

She'd better care.

She's facing sanctions and possible disbarment. Her government career is likely finished.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

And what was her lie? What did she do that was so egregious she should be disbarred? Nothing illegal, the BAR association is ultra liberal and they hate Trump and all who support him.

To "progressives" all means are justified in destroying the people they hate.

 

Look, I am not one bit worried that a show on CNN and Mika refuses to let Kellyann on their shows. It proves to me that all that means is that CNN show and the MSNBC Morning Joe are just shows.

 

After scanning through this thread, its clear this is (as expected) a "big bag of nutin' " A lot of "progressives" spewing hate and hypocrisy, nothing new about that.

 

I not worried about that either. What I'm worried about is that another member of Trump's flawed staff has been caught habitually lying and engaged in unethical behavior. It took a complaint from her peers to motivate the Trump administration to silence her and remove her from the public eye.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

- - - Updated - - -

Nixon basically said the same thing.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

So far they haven't lied their ass off to pass any laws. They haven't tried to cover up the motivations for an attack by blaming it on a video. They haven't lied to start a war or raised our taxes. I'd say currently they are head and shoulders above previous administrations.

- - - Updated - - -

Hahahahahahahaha. Keep dreaming snowflake. What I do find interesting is the left wants to force Trump out of office. They spent 8 years crying because McConnell wanted Obama to be a one term President but now they are actively trying to remove Trump from office. Talk about a danger to the republic, the left is running headlong toward the destruction of our system. But then that's their ultimate goal anyway isn't it.

 

ROFLMAO says the person who whined about Bill Clintons perjury and obstruction of justice being mentioned.

What did you say about statrting a new thread?

 

In which court?

- - - Updated - - -

It didn't end Bill Clintons political career when he comitted perjury and obstruction of justice did it?

 

Likely before the DC equivalent of an attorney's professional responsibility board.

We're not talking about former President Clinton. Of course, you are more than welcome to start a thread about him if you so choose.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

First off, I didn't whine. And either stay on topic or have the courtesy to start a new thread regarding the Clinton's and/or Obama.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

I asked in what COURT did she engage in unethical behavior?

We're not talking Nixon but you injected him.

So Cljnton walked into a federal court and a federal gand jury and commited perjury and obstruction of justice and it did not end hisbpolitical career and in fact the Demoxrats wouldnhave run him again had they be able to and were hoping he would end up on the supreme court.

And now this trivial specious matter?

- - - Updated - - -

Of course you did and if you get to inject Nixon I get to inject Clinton.

 

Have a read of the actual complaint letter. http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/do...st-white-house-counsel-kellyanne-conway/2346/

I can't copy and paste from it, but basically the rule in question does not require the misconduct to be part of the practice of law nor involve criminal conduct. The complainants suggest that the rule should not be applied generally, but only to Ms Conway in respect to her position as advisor to the President.

It would be an interesting extension of the bar rules...

 

Nuisance case, Presidential pardon!

 

A soon as I saw "law professors" the law suit lost al credibility.

academia needs to grow up, shut up, or at the very least put up.

 

Read it. They having a compelling case for, at a minimum, professionally sanctioning Conway.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

- - - Updated - - -

The President hasn't the authority to pardon unprofessional and/or unethical conduct by a member of the Bar.

Regards,

Jason Bourne

 

Don't these professors have more important and productive things to focus on? Like actually studying ethical and moral philosophy to pass on their legal wisdom and teachings to the young minds of America? I think the greatest weakness in the legal profession is the lack of ethical and moral philosophical training.

 

"Extension" talk about a stretch. Again she is NOT a legal counsel, she is not functioning as a lawyer, was not hired as a lawyer and as someone else noted does not even have a current license to practice law.

 

This letter of complaint is ridiculous. They will have to do much better than that.

 

Huh, they have a weak case at best on all their points of evidence.

 

Agreed, ridiculous.

I'm not sure they can do much better. Just Google a few of the signatories to the complaint.

Susan L. Brooks


Associate Dean for Experiential Learning




Biography

Susan L. Brooks is a pioneer in the emerging field of therapeutic jurisprudence. She is also an expert on experiential learning, family law and children’s rights.

A widely published scholar on clinical legal education, Professor Brooks is a frequent presenter at national and international conferences that focus on experiential learning in legal education.

Professor Brooks co-edited the third edition of “Learning from Practice,” and the second edition of "Clinical Anthology: Readings for Live-Client Clinics." Her article, “Using a Communication Perspective to Teach Relational Lawyering,” appeared in the Nevada Law Journal. She co-authored, with Professor Rachel López, “Designing a Clinic Model for a Restorative Community Justice Partnership,” in the Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, and “Epistemology and Ethics in Relationship-Centered Legal Education and Practice,” (with Robert Madden), in the New York Law School Law Review. She co-edited "Relationship-Centered Lawyering: Social Science Theory for Transforming Legal Practice" with R.G. Madden in 2009. Her scholarly publications also include "Trying Differently: A Relationship-Centered Approach to Representing Clients with Cognitive Challenges," (with David M. Boulding) in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry and "Representing Children in Families" in the Nevada Law Journal.

In 2016, she organized “Beloved Community: the Second Annual Conference of the Project for Integrating Spirituality, Law & Politics."

Professor Brooks came to the law school from the faculty of the Vanderbilt University Law School. She was a co-founder of the Tennessee Relative Caregiver Coalition and the Tennessee Association of Professional Mediators and served as lead investigator for Tennessee’s Court Improvement Program and as a principal investigator on an Immigrant Community Assessment sponsored by Metropolitan Nashville.

After clerking for the Hon. Bernard A. Friedman of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, she practiced with Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal in Chicago.

She was a case worker for Jewish Family and Community Service in Chicago before earning her JD at New York University School of Law, where she was note and comment editor for the New York University Law Review and received the Judge Aileen Haas Schwartz Award for outstanding work in the field of children and the law.

Professor Brooks is a member of the Global Alliance for Justice Education.

 

Really they should be focusing on their students, this is obsessive anti-Trump behaviour now.