Scoring is what celebrities and groupies are all about - it is their mutual objective. Surely you know that. The affected outrage of political partisans has become very transparent to voters.
I am well aware of what scoring means. Surely you know what sexual assault is, and THAT is what is so outrageous and dispicable about what is on that tape. The man is BRAGGING about getting away with repeated SEXUAL ASSAULT. That ain't just "locker room" talk, that is a snapshot of how the man himself thinks and it stinks.
Oh my. there's rather a long trail of "evidence" or prior allegations at least, but perhaps you think it mere "happenstance". http://fortune.com/2016/10/09/president-debate-trump-sexual-harassment/ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-rape-accusation-underage-girl-claim-what-happened-sexual-assault-allegation-a7354111.html http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/turns-out-donald-trump-attacked-woman-who-accused-him-of-sexual-assault-this-year/
Tell that to the courts. http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/10/...-ordered-trumps-child-rape-case-move-forward/
It's relevant to the fact that the "man" who said it is running for the Presidency. ...and everybody else isn't. It isn't about just one word and the moronic, "gee, everybody says it" crap....it's about Trump's entire attitude towards 51% of the population. Even Trump is quoted as saying years ago that it was a good thing he wasn't running for office because of things he did and said......even HE knew it wasn't a good thing to say...
Nah, just a bunch of accusations. You know like all those accusations against crooked hilary and not one actual example of them. Keep defending the indefensible, ignoring the picture of your own morality and sexist attitudes it paints.
IOW, you cannot list any credible examples of Trump committing sexual assault. There were corroborating witnesses to the severe bite wound on Broaderick's upper lip. Clinton paid a $850K settlement in the Jones case. So who else did Broaddrick talk to? Three of her friends tell NBC News she told them about the alleged incident at the time: Susan Lewis... Susan Lewis: “It was very traumatic for her.” Louise Ma... Myers: “Did you urge her to report it?” Louise Ma: “No.” Myers: “Why not?” Louise Ma: “Because women were made victims at the time. And you know what the courts were like in that time period. It was always the woman’s fault.” And Jean Darden, the sister of Norma Kelsey, the woman who says she saw Juanita at the hotel. Lisa Meyers Interview with Juanita Broaderick, " "Broaddrick says Clinton assaulted her, Exclusive interview with the woman known as ‘Jane Doe Number 5’"NBC News.
When I first heard about it months ago I figured it was made up BS....Now I'm not so sure. Basically a Federal Judge just gave the OK for Trumps trial on Child Rape charges.
"Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams has ordered the hearing for 16 December in a New York court. She has asked for both sides to provide information to assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial. According to the latest reports(*)about about the chilling 1990s child rape lawsuit: The allegations against Trump apparently occurred in the 1990s, when Trump was attending parties thrown by convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein, who was notorious for arranging sex parties with underage girls for America’s wealthy elites. Two witnesses are now joined by a third, “Joan Doe,” who said in court documents*)“In the 1994-95 school year, I was told by the plaintiff in Jane Doe v. Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) that the plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994.” As you are obviously too ascared or lazy to click a damn link...we are done here. Have A Nice Day - - - Updated - - - "Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams has ordered the hearing for 16 December in a New York court. She has asked for both sides to provide information to assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial. According to the latest reports(*)about about the chilling 1990s child rape lawsuit: The allegations against Trump apparently occurred in the 1990s, when Trump was attending parties thrown by convicted pedophile Jeffery Epstein, who was notorious for arranging sex parties with underage girls for Americas wealthy elites. Two witnesses are now joined by a third, Joan Doe, who said in court documents*)In the 1994-95 school year, I was told by the plaintiff in Jane Doe v. Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) that the plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. As you are obviously too ascared or lazy to click a damn link...we are done here. Have A Nice Day
Its aggravating when one uses mere accusations as statements of fact, isn't it? But it seems that irony is lost upon you. and I wasn't commenting on Bill, I was commenting on the fact that indeed there have been a number of accusations made against trump for sexual misconduct. I find it interesting that trump defenders can't quite get their heads around the fact that what he describes as his repeated behavior qualifies as sexual assault under the LAW. Its not just words. OTOH, I do agree that despite his knowledge that he was mic'd, the conversation was not for public consumption, just like the content of hacked emails (of either party). It doesn't excuse it, nor does it render such comments readily dismissable.
I heard a brief reference to it. Dismissed and now reconsidered? Something like that. Probably nonsense. If Trump was into that he would have a long history of it by now.
So far you have been unable to paste up a single example of anything that would amount to sexual assault,
it's not the word... it's not about the language. You can dress it up any way you want to, but he goes around grabbing people's genitals... why are no one disturbed about this?
I get it, the accusations by these women is not to be believed when it comes to Trump, but to be absolute gospel when it comes to bill. You do know that there is a law suit that alleges Trump RAPED A 13 year old girl along with his pal Epstein and recently two corroborating witnesses have come forward, don't you?
It is always an issue with judges. Especially when politics is involved. Especially when an election is pending.