Let's talk about Race

At no point in your opening statement or throughout the thread have you posted even the slightest evidence of your claim that white liberals have created institutionalized racism towards fellow whites. This is merely an absurd presumption on your part with absolutely no valid basis to support it.

 

You mean you haven't watched MSNBC? Or better yet, go run a platform these days on Protectionism of the U.S Borders and let's see how long it takes before you're called a racist. I give it, 72 hours tops. You haven't seen the Ferguson aftermath? The New York incidents? Is our marginalization not clear enough to you?

It's in the Cultural Marxist playbook to propose an enemy(this enemy being "White America"), demonizing it and then blacking it out from ever reaching mainstream discussion again. As an example, what do you think of the current state of the Republican Party? If you think every Republican is a Neo-Con(or that every Neo-Con is a Republican), the Cultural Marxist has successfully used propaganda.

Another example is the Tea Party/Fiscal Conservatives. Did you buy the terrorist hype? Did you believe that Fiscal Conservatism was unwise in a country with an 18 trillion dollar obligation? Cultural Marxist Propaganda shut them down as well(with no help from the Neo-Con old guards)

But the greater problem is what you construe as evidence. Because while I see these political movements for what they are(an attempt to marginalize European-Americans in the political sphere), you obviously do not. So while I can give you evidence, it's wholly plausible(and in fact, highly likely) that you'll deny this evidence.

But I'll give you evidence, on one condition: If you don't accept the evidence for what it is, don't reply. I don't have patience to make posts, or a conversation in which neither of us will get anywhere. Your denialism isn't my problem.

Let's start here

I'll admit, the first link is politically subjective. Partially because the Neo-Cons/Republicans deny how they've pretty much become the visage of another country(Israel) but that's another thread topic altogether. But the Mary Frances quotes are disturbing, are they not? Are Whites not Americans? Do not they hold the same civil rights? Or is there a legal form of Separatism, which they themselves theoretically object to?

Do as I say, but not as I do!

Pure Win

I haven't read this man's book on the subject, but I may. If only to expand my knowledge on how it came to be, and how to defeat it. This element exists, and as long as it persists it will pose a grave and mortal danger to our society and to our country.

 

Using your illogical rants then a good case can be made for saying right wingers have fostered and promoted racism towards minorities. If cultural Marxists can be said to deny your rants, then cultural fascists will deny the idea that I just posted if either were entirely true.

 

Please explain how this isn't a combination of a tone argument and name calling devoid of any substantial response.

 

He said that people who deny what he said are "cultural Marxists".

I certainly am not a Marxist. Therefore, I feel compelled to ask why you did not question his supposition. So go ahead now and do so.


But if one can be called a cultural Marxist for holding one view then it follows that one ca be called a cultural fascist for holding an opposing view.


Note that I said in the above post that this could so IF the supposition (that libs cause anti-white sentiment & cons cause anti-minority sentiments) taken is accurate. IF being the operative term.


For the record, I do not feel libs cause racism towards whites (the majority of libs in this country are white just in case you didn't know). Nor do I feel that cons cause racism towards minorities.

 

But he said your approach was typical Cultural Marxist, and rather than address that you called him "Cultural Fascist", as if the point was name calling.

This isn't even tu quoque, it's mindless name calling.

Is your approach Cultural Marxist in style or not?

 

Of course it doesn't. Fascist isn't the opposite of Marxist. And even if it was that's a subject change.

 

You are entitled to your opinion.

But bear in mind he is the one who changed the subject to "cultural Marxism" and still hasn't proven his claim that libs have caused racism towards whites in this society. Also note that the vast majority of political libs are white. Therefore, it is he who changed the subject and still has not given any evidence to support his claim - a problem we continue to see just about every day in this forum.

 

And obviously you randomly accuse him of abusing minorities, and being "right wing" rather than correct. What a disgraceful response.

 

Where shall we start? Boasian "anthropology"? Demonization of White self defence in the bought media?

 

I said he abuses minorities?

Where - show me.

 

I'll address that after you address post 260.

 

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Boasian_pseudo-anthropology


I read about this in college about 45 years ago. Don't remember much so I cannot address it knowledgeably.

Perhaps you can give a lecture and full explication as I am not qualified to do so.


Now answer my question.

 

This is a video shot in Santa Fe, a Garifuna village on the Honduran mainland. I see one of my brothers there, but I won't say which one he is. They are all dressed up and putting on a show for the tourists on Garifuna Day, April 12. The songs are old traditional songs about the history of Garifunas, and the dances tell the story of the words. This is Jancunú, which means "mask" in Garifuna. It's kind of long but you get the idea.

We are very open to other races, and many of our people marry white Americans and Canadians. I will be glad to answer any questions about the Garifuna culture to anyone who is interested.

[video=youtube;q4d3_AymjGc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4d3_AymjGc[/video]

 

I'm always amused when I hear racists try to label their opposition by ridiculous terms like "cultural Marxist."

There is nothing Marxist about supporting Egalitarian views. Egalitarianism is a moral philosophy that values equal rights for all people. Logically Egalitarianism can be seen as morally righteous or good. Racism is obviously evil but racists will try their best to demonize their opposition. They create terms like "Boasian Anthropology" as defined on alternative Encyclopedias like Metapedia which calls it a politically-motivated pseudoscience. In reality racialism is a pseudoscience and racialists are motivated by racist ideology to propose unscientific ideas.

What's going on here is racists are engaging in verbal warfare using twisted logic to make themselves out to be morally and scientifically correct. Intelligent individuals can see right through their tactics recognizing the evil racist bigots for what they are.

 

Still waiting for an answer to my question.



By the way since we are talking about race and relations, here's yet another case in which a distraught family is consoled by taxpayer financed compensation for a police crime:




New York City settles with family of slain black teen for $3.9 million

Source: Reuters

New York City has settled with the family of an unarmed black teen fatally shot by police in 2012, agreeing to pay $3.9 million, officials said on Friday.

Ramarley Graham, 18, was shot dead on Feb. 2, 2012 inside the bathroom of his Bronx apartment after being followed by police officers who said they believed he was carrying a gun.

"This was a tragic case," New York City Law Department spokesman Nicholas Paolucci said in an email.

"After evaluating all the facts, and consulting with key stakeholders such as the NYPD, it was determined that settling the matter was in the best interest of the city," he added.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/31/us-usa-new-york-lawsuit-idUSKBN0L404V20150131




As I have said before we can solve this problem if society were to force the police unions to pay. For some reason, forum conservatives refuse to agree when they know it is the TRUTH.