https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/14/police-khans-london-ban-pro-trump-rally-u-s-embassy/ Khan and the English authorities selectively use free speech laws to further their political ideologies. It only highlights how corrupt the system is and no one is fooled.
Brightfart All the rightwing nut propaganda you could wish for. If there is a true fact on that site it is crying for loneliness
the usual suspects have sided with China, Mexico, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Hamas, May, Merkel, Trudeau, Marcon, Kuhn....and that's just in the last 20 months. Still have over six years to go.... pattern? yes, Virginia, I believe there is...
Well, seems that the rally which was supposedly banned went ahead https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-trump-supporters-not-to-gather-at-us-embassy And as predicted it was composed of a whole lot of far right wing racist tosspots
There is absolutely zero evidence that streamed opinions given from a public space near a courthouse will somehow magically ensure a trial will become unjust. You might as well claim any opinions about the trial of rape gangs in the UK at all will threaten the fairness of that trial and shut down ALL free speech in order to be consistent with regard to authoritarian laws and do away with "free speech" altogether.
He doesn't understand, because it goes against all the western principles of free speech. And he expects the US president to comply to those western norms. Dunno how you can vomit up that standing behind western norms is psychopathic.
Nonsense. There is still a commitment to fair trials in the English criminal justice system. The right to a fair trial outweighs the so-called free speech of people to jeopardise that right. Yaxley-Lennon knew he what he was doing was in contempt of court.
Yes, exactly. Nonsense! The right to stand on public ground and stream commentary about an upcoming trial or other commentary has never jeopardized the outcome of a trial in America. To pretend what Robinson did could influence the outcome of the trial of Pakistani rape gangs (it did not) is absurd and it's never stopped the BBC or big UK newspapers from wall to wall coverage of trials of great public interest. Your stance is ridiculous and not supported by facts. https://news.sky.com/story/sir-clif...raid-coverage-was-in-public-interest-11346488 The double standard here is laughable and shows how foolish your spoon fed comments are.
His wife condescendingly patted her. Guardsmen nearly attacked her. He shook hands with the japanese Emperor while bowing. He wasn't known for his mastery of etiquette. But the Queen is quite used to that. No one knows this stuff. I don't.
Keep in mind what kind of person Khan is: his #1 moral guide for all time is a person (Mohammad) who had sex, repeatedly, with a NINE year-old when he was 54 years-old. NINE! 'Nuff said. Not just, say, a janitor that he hires, nor, say, the vendor that he buys his coffee from, no, but his #1 MORAL GUIDE (Mohammad) FOR ALL TIME! A sane person says "what!?, she was HOW old!?" - and then leaves that cult in about 0.000001 of a nano-second later.
Desirable models like her choose rich (even too-old, overweight, disgusting) guys because these women are gold-diggers.