Looking for honest peer !

Your maths doesn't work because:

• It's largely absent
• On the most basic level it fails - the units on each side of the equation don't match

 

Incorrect , would you like to do a step by step with me ?

What symbol or sign would you use for charge ?

Coulomb uses Q , so I used Q

the Micro bang theory requests the preliminary acceptance of Q- to represent a negative charged mono-pole (traditionally an electron charge) and Q+ to represent a positive charged mono-pole (traditionally a Proton charge).

What symbol or sign would you use for an infinite volume of space ?

the Micro bang theory requests that you'll preliminary accept the value k to represent infinite absolute space .

Now I want to divide this ZPE charge by infinite space , so what do you think the maths read?

charge / infinite space =

Why does infinite space divide the charge ?

1) <E

2) A mono-pole charge has no binary bond

 

What are you attempting prove or communicate by dividing a finite charge by infinite space (which, according to current theory does not exist, the universe is generally considered to be finite and expanding) ?

 

That the ZPE pops into existence having a density then divides by infinite popping it out of existence , having a 0 magnitude and 0 density .

The visual universe is finite , it is visual boundary relative to observation and the nature of light .

I think you'll understand this diagram : 8 of my contents .

 

That equation is the nutz..... love it ...



The transition speed of high energy state points to lesser energy state points is a constant of 299 792 458 m / s.

So that means E / <E at 299 792 458 m / s.

Added- Yes that makes sense because light slows down in a medium .

E / >E = < c

Obviously the density of medium having a greater electrical resistance on the traversing electromagnetic radiation ...like this



The visible light is created because the frequency of the light as slowed slightly because of the mediums electrical resistance and density . When it leaves the medium , as you can see the frequency becomes out of visible range for sight .

 

More gibberish equations again.

Energy / time = Velocity

As usual, the units do not match

 

Once again, you demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea.

If something is transitioning from one state to another then this would be expressed as a rate (the number of times something occurs in a given period of time), not as a velocity (the distance moved in a period of time).

Yet again another nonsense equation.

 

No it's not , show where it is at error ? It explains the speed of light is the transition . Light has no propulsion !

The process or a period of changing from one state or condition to another.

Energy divided by less than energy does so at the speed of light .

(E / <E)/t

What is wrong with that ? Explain ...

The energy is divided by a less than energy over a period of time and the speed and direction the energy traverses to lower states is v(c) .

Try it this way if you like :

v (E) /dx = c

c is a temporal transition like it or not and visible light is a temporal transition phase shift .

 

I've said it several times, and I'll no doubt say it many more times..

The units don't match.

 

You're hard work ! Never mind the maths of that for a moment , can you give me your opinion on my edit of section 2 of my contents , please?


2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ).

We've already discussed the absolute of space and in a sense , space is an infinite volume of nothingness that has always existed and will always exist . It would seem quite impossible that a fundamental energy that powered the Universe could manifest itself from nothingness . Any given point of space would have no force or pressure acting on it , it would seem a miracle would be required for zero point energy (ZPE) to form at any given point of space . The notion of how energy first manifested is seemingly imperceivable , we can only make our best guess's , using our knowledge , logic and intuition of how this manifestation event could of possibly occurred.

The present model , The Big Bang Theory , suggests the universe expanded from a very high-density and high-temperature state but gives no origin reason(s) of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested . Micro bang theory is my proposal and best ''guess'' of how this high-density , high -temperature state manifested, proposing opposite polarity electrostatic point charges (mono-poles) , popping into and out of existence .

The Universe inside and out considers the conditions of a very high-density and high-temperature state , firstly recognising and proposing , that for any form of energy to exist or any event to take place , that energy or event would with a certainty need a pre-existing spatial volume to exist in or occur in . Thus concluding a pre-existing absolute space as explained prior in section 1 .

The Universe inside and out now explores the physics involved and what would happen to a manifested mono-pole point charge that manifested at any given point of space. In conceptual thought of a point charge namely zero point energy , it would be seemingly apparent that the surrounding spatial points of the ZPE point would be a lesser energy , less dense state , than the higher density , higher energy state of the point charge .
In consideration of thermal dynamics and spectral emissions , a higher energy state points energy , traverses to lower energy state points . In the second law of thermodynamics ,heat flows naturally from an object at a higher temperature to an object at a lower temperature. To assume a point charge does not function the same way would seem unrealistic ! To propose that a manifested mono-pole point charge undergoes a temporal transition changing from one state or condition to another over a period of time , would seem realistic and an evidental proposal based on thermal dynamics and spectral emissions .

One could suggest that the point charge simply self annihilates by dispersing into space , by the natural self drive mechanism of higher energy temporal transition to lower energy state points . This would seem a ''true'' assumption and for our understanding the Universe inside and out proposes and requests you accept the self annihilation to be namely , The Micro bang process .

The proposed micro bang process , from the instant of manifestation of a mono-pole electrostatic point charge , ZPE ! It is instantly attracted to all the surrounding lesser energy space in an isotropic manner , a conditional and natural transitional state , causality of self annihilation .
Additionally , because the manifested charge is instantly in a state of self annihilation , the density is instantly weakened beyond the magnitude needed to create a strong binary force , which we'll be discussing in section 3.

It's difficult to express the temporal transition of energy changing from one state or condition to another mathematically in terms of units and values. The infinitive of space having no representation in terms of dimensions or values , XYZt and entropy being irrelevant .

To gain mutual understanding the Micro bang process requests that you'll preliminary accept the value k to represent infinite absolute space . Additionally the Micro bang process requests the preliminary acceptance of Q- to represent a negative charged mono-pole (traditionally an electron charge) and Q+ to represent a positive charged mono-pole (traditionally a Proton charge).

In preliminary acceptance of these values , the Micro bang process expresses :

1) Q- / k = 0

A mono-pole point negative charge divided by an infinite volume of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence to zero magnitude and zero density .

2) Q+ / k = 0

A mono-pole point positive charge divided by an infinite volume of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence to zero magnitude and zero density .

 

Look at the following word salad....

"a mono-pole point charge manifestation has no mechanism to retain form or density, in an infinite volume of lesser energy absolute space"

This is why your "theory" is so difficult to understand. You use terms of your own invention and or misuse standard terms.

I recognise that it is often difficult to communicate complex things in a language as malleable as English. This is why actual scientists tend to use mathematics.

 

No, I'm not going to "never mind the maths" - because it's the core of your whole problem.

You have a wild idea which runs counter to the rest of accepted science and you expect everyone else to jump through hoops to try and understand what appears to be nonsense. You also haven't provided one jot of evidence that the existing theories are flawed (indeed they have a mountain of evidence to support them) nor any evidence to support your own wild imaginings.

Mathematics is the language of physics. If you are going to communicate with physicists then you need to learn that language - at the moment you're doing the equivalent of shouting loudly in pig-latin and expecting a group of puzzled Italians to understand you.

My short assessment is that Section 2 like the other sections is nonsense and, to paraphrase warnings on police procedural shows, any similarity between what you have written and reality is purely accidental. Take this bit:

I have highlighted in red the bits that are likely true.

 

If you can't understand those sentences then you are definitely not very good at reading !

When people failed to prove the 7 postulates false , that proved science incorrectness .

Introduction.

The Universe inside and out is a scientific theory and paper that investigates and researches past physics and present physics . An investigation that'll propose semantic errors , incorrect physics interpretation and ostensible content that has no others uses but that of the practitioner. The Universe inside and out conceptually considers the intricate details of physical process in search of relative correctness ! Additionally , The Universe Inside and Out proposes several theoretical notions , the beginning of the visual universe , the gravity mechanism , the true nature of light and the meaning of time .

My new intro ....

 

Test : would you understand (+1e / xyz) / t = 0 ?

how about this :

(-Q / R³ ) / t = 0 ? Where -Q is a negative charge and R³ is real coordinate space

c ∝ (E / <E ) / t

(E / <E) / t ∝ c

??????????????

 

More mathematical gibberish in which the units on the two sides of an equation do not match.

 

E=mc² is gibberish and meaningless but that is accepted . I think you are full of beans , my math works fine .

 

Not at all, the units match.....

On the left - a joule is kg*(m/s)2
On the right we have mass (kg) multiplied by a velocity (m/s) squared = kg*(m/s)2

You may feel that your maths works fine but it really doesn't.

 

The you tell me what to use

charge / infinite volume of space

Q / R³ = 0 what is wrong with that ?

There is also no mass at the stage.......

 

The core issues are that if you accept that the universe is not infinite, then the equation is simply wrong.

If you think the universe is infinite then the equation doesn't express anything useful.

Why not actually do your homework rather than getting us to do it for you ?

 

I've done my home work and that is the equation I get .

If you know math it should be very simple for you to describe charge / infinite volume of space ?

Charge is Q ?

 

Why would I want to describe charge/infinite volume of space ?

 

A point charge popping into and out of existence .

I want to explain it in my theory , please help

 

He obviously didn't know how to do the maths !

 

Missed the edit time on the last post , sorry for posting again but I need some math help !

I've thought some more and now have this to explain the micro bang process , this must be correct math ?




The center line is just splitting up the two equations , not a part of it .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_coordinate_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge

 

LMAO! Nailed this guy to the letter!