Media Ignores Information That Doesn't Help Obama

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by MAcc2007, Nov 4, 2012.

  1. MAcc2007

    MAcc2007 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    944
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We all know about Benghazi, and how the mainstream media has no interest in actually asking obvious journalistic questions like, "did Obama give an order to stand down?"

    Clearly the mainstream media was too busy following Sandra Fluke to Nevada to support her humongous nine person rally for free birth control.

    This is the same media that had convinced America that Romney was a stale, "etch-a-sketch" candidate who didn't know anything about anything. But what happened when America actually got to see Romney in action in the first debate? Romney won the debate 69% to 25%. Romney wasn't even close to the picture the liars in the mainstream media had painted. This is the same media who four years sent scores of media personnel up to Wasilla, Alaska to paint Palin in a bad light (obviously for the offense of being a conservative woman).

    But what did the media do when a candidate with a pristine record of success appeared on the stage? They ignored reporting on Romney. Why? Because if you report on Romney you find he saved the US Olympics from disaster and donated his income from the Olympics to charity. Because if you report on Romney you find out he was extremely successful in school and business. Because if you report on Romney you find out he gives substantial amounts OF HIS OWN MONEY and TIME to charity. Because if you report on Romney you find out he has operated in a bipartisan fashion entirely unlike President Obama who crammed an unpopular health care law down our throats and blames Republicans for everything bad that happens in government.

    And now we have the next story the mainstream media will completely ignore; a group of black protesters marching against the policies of Rahm Emmanuel and Barack Obama. And it isn't like it would take much effort for ABC News to cover the story; the protesters are marching in front of the ABC News station.

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/1...ck-chicago-protesters-marching-against-obama/

    This is the same media that followed Cindy Sheehan everywhere, but has too little integrity to investigate the Benghazi story because it may be politically damaging to their President.

    [​IMG]

    If the mainstream media spent any effort in actually researching and reporting the information accurately, whether or not it hurt or helped the President, Obama would lose in a landslide. The economy is in the crapper and the people most affected by Obama's failed policies are those who are poor. Journalistic ethics require the media to cover the stories that affect them, but the mainstream media has no ethics. They have become derelict in their duty. It is sad to see the fourth estate become part of the Obama propaganda machine.
     
  2. HeNeverLies4

    HeNeverLies4 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The media ignores stuff like this because this is as real as the imaginary friend I had in the 4th grade.
     

Share This Page