Right after Mueller testifies, that would be epic. Followed by a Bill Barr press conference and the announcement of several subpoenas.
We still have John Durham's investigation results to look forward to, I predict another health event for Nadler.
Ya know, I'm through responding to people who continue to parrot that nonsense... We can still have fun on other topics, but I can't abide the willful ignorance on the OOJ topic...
I have no hope that Congress will start doing its job. They will keep jumping the shark with this RUSSIA! nonsense.
Horowitz report was supposed to be out in the Late May-June time frame... don't look now, but Mueller is testifying on 7/17.... Note for Horowitz.... 2 business days left in June... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-fisa-abuse-probe-is-done-and-its-devastating
Not for these people.... clarity is the ABSOLUTE last thing they want..... clarity is the enemy of the people....
I guess you hate dealing with the truth. Phony investigation to try and remove Trump office and it failed.
Speak to those who have been doing that for 2.5 years... I know what I read in the Mueller report and I know how former federal prosecutors would have handled that if Trump wasn't president and that's good enough for me...
I almost responded to this with a helpful critique but, with the silly name thing that you do, I couldn't do it.
No collusion, not even scintilla of evidence of any shenanigans with the Russians, no frog-marching, no charges against Trump, Jared, Don Jr, any member of Trump's cabinet. Glad it's good enough for you, cause it's "we told you so" moment for those of us blessed with common sense.
I just don't understand why anyone would bother to read beyond page 9. Page 9 is the end of the story.
This is truly off the wall. Does anybody really believe this? Why bother explaining further. I'm gone from this thread.
Anybody who is still counting on Mueller to pull the impeachment rabbit out of his hat, you're living in a bubble that has already popped.
What part of "he could recommend indictment", "he could state unambiguously that crimes were committed", "he could indict co-conspirators, Jared, Don Jr, cabinet members and aides involved" don't you understand? What part of "Mueller failed to do any of that because according to his multiple statements he had no case, not because he could not indict a sitting president" don't you understand? Jeez, poor libs, so confused, so let down, so humiliated after three year of bleating "frog-marching" and "life sentences". I almost feel sorry for them... well, almost
Mueller can survive embarrassment he might not survive incarceration. Mueller knows jail has worked for Bolger and Manafort.