NATO considers shooting down Russian missiles.

No, most people have not witnessed the things they are saying about Putin.
The US does not receive much accurate information from outside the country,
and people don't do things like use a VPN to find the information and
therefore only use the crap the media publishes because that is easy.

The mainstream/corporate media is all 'yellow' media and so to some
extent also is most of the non-corporate media.

 

Honesty is something I'm very concerned about.

It appears we have been losing the race for honesty against
Russia.

One obvious result is our news is very confusing. Ask someone
who is winning in Ukraine and they will say 'we are'.

Ask if we are fighting Russia and they usually say 'no'.

And they will say Russia has old technology, low morale
trouble recruiting, bad leadership, throws men at defenses,
claimed Russia had been driven out of half the territory they
had in just a few weeks, but then can't explain how Russia
is still there two years later...

 

RuZzia does have old tech....getting destroyed by discounted NATO hardware

They do have low morale.....check Zolkins YT vids.

They do have $hit leadership...and toss meat.

RuZzia has been tossed out of all other areas what they tried to occupy.....where's that 40 mile long convoy?

How's the BSF?

Where's Gerasimov?

How's Belgorod, Kursk areas?.... I'm hearing school kids there are switching to remote learning because of bombs falling on their heads?....by RDK/FRL.

 

As usual, lie from you. Mariupol is under Russian control, Donetsk and Lugansk are under Russian control, Berdyansk is also under Russian control. Soon Odessa and Kharkov will be absorbed by Russia if clown Zelensky does not go to peace negotiations.I doubt that will happen though as Washington said him to fight until the last.Ukranian.

 

Just some thoughts...
- Putin is 71. His whole purpose has been to re-establish the Soviet hegemony. He doesn't have much time left. His eyes are not on the "long game". Nukes is definitely an alternative for him.
- China would love to see Russia and the west duke it out in a nuclear war. With no competition left, China could finally master the world.
- Iran is a wild card that could be a catalyst for ANYTHING. They just want to get to PARADISE... and killing infidels (non-muslims) is a key ingredient.)

 

- Biden is 81. His whole aim in life has been to re-establish US hegemony. He doesn't have much time left. His eyes are not on the "long game". All his Administration want is to break up or destroy the Russian Federation, Iran, China and any threat anywhere to the US bringing lasting peace to the World. Our aim back in the Vietnam War as stated in the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was to bring peace and stability to S E Asia and that was exactly what we did and remains our only objective world-wide to this very day. If the US economy fails then that is a price we are willing to pay.

 

The analogy doesn't work. The US isn't an aggressor. Russia and China are aggressors. Iran just wants to kill infidels.
The US has no desire to break up Russia or China. The US will, however defend itself vigorously if attacked. Well, with cowardly Biden at the helm, that might not be true.

 

What are conservative position to you?

 

So if someone don’t bow to the orange god , something wrong with them? I am guilty of that and I am f^^^ing fine with it!

 

Trump doesn’t want to re-establish US hegemony? No wonder he is a traitor to America. He doesn’t want to make America great again.

 

I mentioned "out of all other areas" previously controlled.....viskochem.....not for long, lotsa partisans in Melitopol, Mariupol that look forward to returning to Ukraine...

How will Odesa....?.....RuZzfascista has been kicked outta Western Black Sea , BSF is relocating to Novorossisk....viskochem......

Kharkiv...good luck, you're quite a dreamer aren't you?....visko?

Try to use Ukrainian spelling....not moscalis.

 

Pootlerstan HAD his eyes on the "long game"...probably till late summer of 2023, when he finally realized it's not possible anymore.

Yeah....his nukes now are the "aces in the hole"....question is will he use them?

https://x.com/AndrewPerpetua/status/1774502461840978079?s=20

 

Oh yeah, uh huh. Yugoslavia says Hi, as well as the numerous other countries that are victims of US foreign policy.

 

It's interesting that Russia's neighbors routinely welcome a US presence. Perhaps this T-shirt points to the reason.

 

He backed Biden for President so for the forum leftists that much mean he's a true conservative!

 

OK so you couldn't answer the question.

Exactly what I expected.

 

You can't either.

 

Oh yeah Jack, right after the bribes are paid with 'foreign aid' . You should go visit some of our 'allies'....and announce your citizenship. See how it works out for you.

 

....not Soviet...Russian...Putin regards the Soviet leaders as...well for want of a better word "traitors" to Russia. He's trying to re-create the old Russian Empire.

 

Oh I did already. Michael Steele isn't a conservative. You're the one who said he is and I asked you what conservative position he currently holds, and that's where you went all static.

You obviously think he's a conservative because you listed him by name, so if you know exactly HOW he is a conservative, how is he? I mean, he'll be voting for Biden (again) this year so what conservative principles does that hold?

 

Looks all defensive to me. Aggression means "attack". Nothing you present has anything to do with attacking anything. I have a security system on my house. Is that "aggressive"? I think not.

When did we invade Yugoslavia?

 

Maybe he simply hates Trump.

Which is NOT an unreasonable position for even a conservative to take

 

Well he definitely hates Trump but I wouldn't exactly call that a conservative position.

 

Yugoslavia was dismembered long before we showed up at the scene.....US didn't show up til 1999....the war in Yugoslavia started back in 92-93.

 

Of course, if mafialand had done the same to Yugoslavia, you would be singing their praises for it.