[Neo] Atheists: How Much Lack of Belief is Required to be an Atheist?

This fails in terms of logic, religion AND science.

Science doesnt make statements about the possiblility of a god. And, religion provides NO answers concerning what some allpowerful intelligence may have chosen to do somewhere.

We are clearly not going to prove a negative by searching everywhere in the universe.

You are left with having to make decisions within a system of stupendously incomplete information.

 

you talk a lot and prove nothing.

nonsequitur to anything I ever said, you are making up again.

Not my problem, but I have crying towels to pass out if it will help.

That the boat you are in, Im agnostic and you are projecting again.

 

Thats a different thread, this one is waiting for will to finish posting all that strawman he is posting so we can resume a discussion on how the lack fails the sniff test in any context neoatheists try to put in. They cant even explain how much one needs to lack to be an atheist. Only one person so far gave a direct answer, everyone else is ducking for cover, dodging, or went awol from the discussion as we were sorting out the facts of the issue.

 

No, it's not.

No they aren't. I've already explained why.

Study up on whatever you wish to study up on. Doesn't change the truth that they are all religious beliefs.

 

Citation, please.

Oh, bully tactics, yay!

The charts don't say what I want them to say. The charts don't say what you want them to say. The charts don't say what you imagine about me.

Then again, you argue that by some weird standards, wrongly attributed to me, agnostics magically become atheists because I supposedly say so, leading us to:

From now on, I can claim that you, an agnostic, are really an atheist, and there's no rational argument left for you to prove me wrong. You just gave me the power to declare you an atheist on a gold platter, thank you so much.

You didn't provide a link, I had to google the image. Feel free to prove me wrong with a citation.

To whomever may wonder why I bothered to reply to that...well, that: yes, I'm bored.

 

citation is in the post stream, it helps if you read the posts in subject matter context.

Stating the obvious where you screwed up is not bullying tactics by anyones standards but neoatheists protesting their lost battle for legitimacy.

Typical neoatheist no-think. Hmm did orwell cover that, one is that another koko original?

I gave you no such thing, but feel free to sound as foolish as the rest that cant get it right.

Again, the link was the pic, sorry thats so difficult for you.

So you come out to pick a fight, and accuse me........of being a bully.......

 

https://reasonsforjesus.com/atheism-fails-explain-beginning-universe/