Who cares? There's not that many fruits to begin with. And FAILING miserably.... We're STILL ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING IN REGIME CHANGE DUH......... You'll have to cite a CREDIBILE source for that hogwash. Ya, it's called CLOSING the BORDER. You can thank capitalism for that.
Obama will be the man to make Carter look good. He has no leadership skills, no management skills and no sense of economic progress. GDP is at 2%. Fail. FAIL. MEGAFAIL. There isn't a single thing you can point to of any import that is a success where I can point to many failures. Apologize to your children for the decades of darkness he will precipitate and hang your head in shame for the SECOND vote you gave this fraud.
Amongst others, homophobes apparently care. Many seem as distraught as would be the most conservative, sharia-wielding Ayatollah at the prospect. The prospect of equality even causes some bigots to mewl invectives.
Yes, keeping us from falling farther into depression. Bringing back the auto industry. Creating jobs even with so much GOP obstruction. Improving health care for most Americans. Reining in Wall Street shenanigans. Keeping us out of wars. And next year with be a banner year on immigration reform, background checks and minimum wage increase. Unemployment could be down to 6%. Oh, and better administration of regulations by new administrators.
I don't regret one second for him a second time. The Republican Party is pure 100% garbage. Your historical assessment of President Obama will not be shared by historians--they're not given to partisan hackery, sorry.
Do you have a source on how many oppose ACA because it doesn't go far enough? "But 41% say they oppose the law because they think it's too liberal, with 14% saying the measure doesn't go far enough. That means that 54% either support Obamacare, or say it's not liberal enough." http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/27/cnnorc-poll-are-obamacares-flaws-fixable/comment-page-14/
Unless Obama smartens up as president then it looks like indeed he will go down in history as one of the greatest failures the Democratic Party has ever -- twice -- put inside the Oval Office. Still, fame is fame after all.
It's hard to reply to smiley emoticons, so I'll only touch on one of your weak responses: Americans want expanded background checks by a huge margin: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...giffords-says-americans-overwhelmingly-suppo/
I've always thought of LBJ as being the worst in my lifetime, with Jimmy Carter second worst. Jimmy Carter was a decent and honest man, IMO; but very inept and ineffective, a defeatist in many regards. Obama is in a league of his own, more of an anti-president than a president; possessing all the traits one would not want in a president. I don't think it is fair to the other presidents to even compare him to them.
Deregulation, his decision to keep the cost of our 'war of choice' off the books, coupled with the massive debt he left us all with, and the "bailout" situation he was commander in chief over.
How about the next right wing nominee be worth of being President of the US? Bush's damage will affect decades of whatever will be left of our economic system (aka, pyramid scheme). The man is not only a war criminal, but a murderer, a liar, and a really asinine excuse for the leader of the free world, to boot. One thing is for sure. Whomever the republican nominee will be, they'll lose, because they're not representative of the common man.
Why couldn't you guys offer anything better? TWICE? Must not be as bad ad you right wing hacks make him out to be, huh? If he was what you say he is, then you should have been able to beat him, easily, but, TWICE, that didn't happen, because your offerings were so pathetic.
You have Obama. Bush is long gone. Own your fail. It's yours, start to finish, top to bottom. BTW, the common man has lost ~10% of his middle class income under the Obumble regime. Well done.
Obama's fail is his own enabled by voters like you. You can't push it off on Romney, McLame or Bush. Only children try this dodge.
I'm still looking for the first gang banger to appear at a gun show in Tulsa, OK or Helena, MT so he can buy his gun without a background check.
Personally? The state can do away with marriage altogether and leave it to religious institutions. Give tax credits for having children and procreating the species.
Of course you picked the moral majority one *chuckle....... If 90% of Americans wanted to rape your mom would it make raping your mom right?
WHAT deregulation? Be SPECIFIC. The rest of your mumble jumble is clearly irrelevent to the financial meltdown.
Here:http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877320,00.html ...and here:http://thinkprogress.org/economy/20...-are-right-to-blame-bush-for-the-bad-economy/ ...and here:http://moneymorning.com/2009/01/13/deregulation-financial-crisis/ The S & L scandal was just the warmup act for what Bush Jr. would do.
Doesn't contain a specific deregulation Bush was responsible for. Doesn't contain a specific deregulation Bush was responsible for. Perhaps you should actually READ what you posted as this article rightly states the financial meltdown was decades in the making with no single person responsible and culminated with a 2004 SEC decision, NOT Bush signed deregulation as you WRONGLY insinuated. ANYONE with half a brain and an ounce of objectivity would know the financial meltdown was a result of bipartisan policies over the last few decades. Except you've provided no specific evidence,much partisan rhetoric and wonderful copy and paste skills. Once again, OBJECTIVE researchers but the blame squarely on BOTH parties over the last 2 decades or so of policy.
Obama wasn't even in office.....Now, of course he's responsible for the PAINFULLY slow recovery though with anti-business regulation, rhetoric and tax raising.
